Skip to main content

A Gendered Lens for Genocide Prevention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover A Gendered Lens for Genocide Prevention

Part of the book series: Rethinking Political Violence ((RPV))

  • 740 Accesses

Abstract

An understanding of gender and the ways in which gender is performed is central to achieving effective, long-term, humanist mechanisms for genocide prevention. This book develops the concept of “a gendered lens for genocide prevention,” providing innovative and effective ways in understanding the role of gender in genocide studies, and new tools for policymaking and preventative efforts. A gendered lens for genocide prevention is based on recognizing early warning signs of preconditioned behavior for perpetrating genocide and mass atrocities.

While gender has been recognized as a crucial factor in understanding genocide and mass atrocities, most notably in the work of Adam Jones, a specific gendered lens for genocide prevention remains to be lacking in both policy and academia. To provide a framework for a gendered lens for genocide prevention, the authors draw on contemporary feminist theory, concepts of masculinity, critical discussions of international law and in-depth case studies. The authors uncover socially constructed gender roles for the onset, form and prevention of genocide and mass atrocities.

The framework is applied to a diverse range of topics, covering historic cases of genocide and its treatment by international law, for instance the Holocaust, the Red Khmer and Rwanda, and also contemporary cases like mass atrocities committed against Yazidis in Iraq and Syria.

The book does not attempt to offer a single or particular solution to preventing genocide and mass atrocities, but rather highlights the fact that it is prevention that should be at the forefront of both academic work and political initiatives. The editors propose that any future work on genocide and mass atrocity prevention should involve a better understanding of how gendered roles interact with violence at different stages, and how working with this knowledge can assist prevention efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Adam Jones (ed.). Gendercide and genocide (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2004), and Adam Jones, “Gendercide: Examining gender-based crimes against women and men,” Clinics in Dermatology 31: 2 (2013): 226.

  2. 2.

    Tom Cushman, “Is genocide preventable? Some theoretical considerations,” Journal of Genocide Research 5:4 (2003): 523.

  3. 3.

    Henry Theriault, “Against the grain: Critical reflections on the state and future of genocide scholarship,” Genocide Studies and Prevention 7:1 (2012): 124f.

  4. 4.

    Ibid.

  5. 5.

    See Cushman, “Genocide,” 524.

  6. 6.

    See Christiane Fröhlich and Giovanna Gioli, “Gender, conflict and global environmental change.” Peace Review – A Journal of Social Justice 27: 2 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Cushman, “Genocide,” 524.

  8. 8.

    Ibid.

  9. 9.

    Theriault, “Against the grain,” 125.

  10. 10.

    Jones, “Gendercide,” 227.

  11. 11.

    Mary Anne Warren, Gendercide: The implications of sex selection (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1985): 22.

  12. 12.

    Jones, “Gendercide,” 227.

  13. 13.

    For example the UN Office for the Special Advisor on Genocide Prevention.

  14. 14.

    Gregory H. Stanton originally presented as a briefing paper, “The Eight Stages of Genocide” at the US State Department in 1996. Discrimination and Persecution have since been added to the 1996 model. See, http://www.genocidewatch.org/genocide/tenstagesofgenocide.html.

  15. 15.

    Anna Kaijser and Annica Kronsell, “Climate change through the lens of intersectionality.” Environmental Politics 23: 3 (2013): 419.

  16. 16.

    For instance K Crenshaw, “Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color,” Stanford Law Review 43:6 (1991), and Pinar Bilgin, Identity/Security (The Routledge Handbook of New Security Studies, ed. by J. P. Burgess, Routledge, 2010).

  17. 17.

    Gabriele Winker and Nina Degele, “Intersectionality as multi-level analysis: Dealing with social inequality,” European Journal of Women’s Studies 18:1 (2011): 51.

References

  • Bilgin, Pinar. Identity/Security. The Routledge Handbook of New Security Studies, (edited by) J. P. Burgess. London and New York: Routledge, 2010, pp. 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberlé. “Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color.” Stanford Law Review 43:6 (1991), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, Tom. “Is genocide preventable? Some theoretical considerations.” Journal of Genocide Research 5:4 (2003), 523–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich, Christiane, and Giovanna Gioli. “Gender, conflict and global environmental change.” Peace Review – A Journal of Social Justice 27:2 (2015), 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Adam (ed.). Gendercide and Genocide. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Adam. “Gendercide: Examining gender-based crimes against women and men.” Clinics in Dermatology 31:2 (2013), 226–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaijser, Anna, and Annica Kronsell “Climate change through the lens of intersectionality.” Environmental Politics 23:3 (2013), 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theriault, Henry. “Against the grain: Critical reflections on the state and future of genocide scholarship.” Genocide Studies and Prevention 7:1 (2012), 123–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Mary Anne. Gendercide: The Implications of Sex Selection. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winker, Gabriele, and Nina Degele “Intersectionality as multi-level analysis: Dealing with social inequality.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 18:1 (2011), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Michele Connellan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Connellan, M.M., Fröhlich, C. (2018). A Gendered Lens for Genocide Prevention. In: Connellan, M., Fröhlich, C. (eds) A Gendered Lens for Genocide Prevention. Rethinking Political Violence. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60117-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics