Skip to main content

Weak Malaise with Democracy in Uruguay

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Malaise in Representation in Latin American Countries

Abstract

In 2015, Uruguay completed 30 years of uninterrupted democracy, a period during which elections regularly took place and the three main political parties had a turn in government in a context of total respect for liberties and political rights. This is reflected in international rankings which identify Uruguay as one of the region’s most solid democracies.1 This privileged situation is, however, not a recent or casual phenomenon but, rather, the product of an institutional and cultural process that began in the early twentieth century and has continued through to the present day with only two interruptions of democracy.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altman, David (2002). “Percepciones ideológicas de lemas y fracciones: Un mapa del sistema de partidos uruguayo (1986-1997)”. Cuadernos del CLAEH, vol. 85, pp 89–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, David (2010). Direct Democracy Worldwide. Cambridge University Press. Mainwaring, Scott and Timothy Scully (1995). Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasquetti, Daniel, and Adolfo Garcé. 2010. Futuros posibles de la democracia uruguaya. In La aventura uruguaya. ¿Naides más que naides? ed. Gerardo Caetano, and Rodrigo Arocena. Montevideo: Debate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasquetti, Daniel and Daniel Buquet (2004). La democracia en Uruguay: una partidocracia de consenso. Política 42: 221–247. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasquetti, Daniel, and Juan Andrés Moraes. 2001. Parlamento y Gobierno en el Uruguay: Hipótesis para una Teoría del Ciclo Político. In La Segunda Transición en el Uruguay: Gobierno y Partidos en un Tiempo de Reformas, ed. Jorge Lanzaro, 297–338. Montevideo: Instituto de Ciencia Política—Fundación de Cultura Universitaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galston, William A. 2001. Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science 4: 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcé, Adolfo (2014). “Apatía y renovación: ¿claves de la elección?”. Documento de Trabajo de la Fundación Konrad Adenauer, Serie Notas de acontecimientos. Available: http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/13211-1442-4-30.pdf

  • Holmberg, Soren. 1999. Down and down we go: Political trust in Sweden. In Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government, ed. Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Mark P. (2005). The Role of Parties and Party Systems in the Policymaking Process. Inter-American Development Bank. Available: http://www6.iadb.org/res/publications/pubfiles/pubS-310.pdf

  • Levi, Margaret. 1998. A state of trust. In Trust and governance, ed. V. Braithwaite, and M. Levi. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott and Timothy Scully (1995). Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam. 2010. Qué esperar de la democracia. Límites y posibilidades del autogobierno. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queirolo, Rosario, and María Fernanda Boidi. 2009. La piedra en el zapato (de las encuestadoras): encuestas de opinión y elecciones internas 2009. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 18: 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queirolo, Rosario and María Fernanda Boidi. 2013. Cultura política de la democracia en Uruguay y en las Américas, 2012. Hacia la igualdad de oportunidades. Montevideo: Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Real de Azúa, Carlos. 1985. Uruguay: ¿una sociedad amortiguadora? Montevideo: Editorial Banda Oriental.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Richard, and William Mishler. 1996. Testing the Churchill hypothesis: Popular support for democracy and its alternatives. Journal of Public Policy 16: 29–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torcal, Mariano, and José Ramón Montero. 2006. Political disaffection in contemporary democracies. Social capital, institutions, and politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaffé, Jaime. 2005. Al centro y adentro. La renovación de la izquierda y el triunfo del Frente Amplio en Uruguay. Montevideo: Editorial Linardi y Risso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurbriggen, Cristina. 2006. Estado, empresario y redes rentistas. Montevideo: Editorial Banda Oriental, Instituto de Ciencia Política.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chasquetti, D. (2017). Weak Malaise with Democracy in Uruguay. In: Joignant, A., Morales, M., Fuentes, C. (eds) Malaise in Representation in Latin American Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59955-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics