Abstract
This chapter introduces readers to the characteristics and theories of complex collaboration. It argues for the applicability of recent research on complex collaborative practices to the different forms of collaboration that are often enacted by writing programs and centers. Drawing on scholarship relevant to complex collaborations, the author connects the work of writing programs and centers to key dimensions put forth by Thomson (Collaboration: Meaning and measurement, 2001), an action framework proposed by organizational studies scholars Cohen and Mankin (Complex collaborations in the new global economy, 2002), the sharing rules of equity and equality put forth by Jap (Journal of Marketing Research 38(1):86–99, 2001), and the characteristics of successful academic collaborations identified by Eddy (Partnerships and collaborations in higher education, 2010), mapping such research to features audiences will find in their reading of the chapters in this collection.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and business. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69–97.
Beyerlein, M. M. , Johnson, D. A. , & Beyerlein, S. T. (2004). Complex collaboration: Building the capabilities for working across boundaries. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Burnett, R. E. , Cooper, A. , & Welhausen, C. A. (2013). What do technical communicators need to know about collaboration? In J. Johnson-Eilola & S. A. Selber (Eds.), Solving problems in technical communication (pp. 454–478). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cohen, S. , & Mankin, D. (2002). Complex collaborations in the new global economy. CEO G 04-10 (462). Los Angeles, CA: Center for Effective Organizations. Retrieved from http://ceo.usc.edu/pdf/G0410462.pdf
Cohen, S. , Mankin, D. , & Fitzgerald, S. (2004). Developing complex collaborations: Basic principles to guide design and implementation. CEO G 02-11 (420). Los Angeles, CA: Center for Effective Organizations. Retrieved from http://ceo.usc.edu/pdf/G0211420.pdf
Currie, L. , & Eodice, M. (2005). Roots entwined: Growing a sustainable collaboration. In J. K. Elmborg & S. Hook (Eds.), Centers for learning: Writing centers and libraries in collaboration (pp. 42–60). Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
Eddy, P. L. (2010). Partnerships and collaborations in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Eodice, M. (2003). Breathing lessons. In M. A. Pemberton & J. Kinkead (Eds.), The center will hold: Critical perspectives on writing center scholarship (pp. 114–129). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
French Jr., J. P. R. , & Raven, B. (1960). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 607–623). New York: Harper and Row.
Gupta, A. & Anish, S. (2012). Insights from complexity theory: Understanding organizations better. tejas@iimb: An IIMB Management Review Initiative. Retrieved from http://tejas.iimb.ac.in/articles/12.php
JAI Press. n.d. Publisher’s Description for Complex collaboration: Building the capabilities for working across boundaries. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.ca/Complex-Collaboration-Building-Capabilities-Boundaries/dp/0762311320
Jap, S. (2001). “Pie-Sharing” in complex collaboration contexts. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 86–99.
Kezar, A. J. , & Lester, J. (2009). Organizing higher education for collaboration: A guide for campus leaders. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Lave, J. , & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mankin, D. , Cohen, S. , & Fitzgerald, S. P. (2004). Developing complex collaborations: Basic principles to guide design and implementation In M. M. Beyerlein , D. A. Johnson , & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Complex collaboration: Building the capabilities for working across boundaries (pp. 1–26). West Yorkshire, UK: Emerald Group.
Melton, J. (2011). Global revisions: (Re)Thinking the future of technical and professional communication competencies. In B. Thatcher & K. S. Amant (Eds.), Teaching intercultural rhetoric and technical communication: Theories, curriculum, pedagogies, and practices. Technical Communication Series (pp. 131–157). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003). Ten principles of complexity & enabling infrastructures. In E. Mitleton-Kelly (Ed.), The application of complexity theory to organisations (pp. 3–20) .Retrieved from http://iic.wiki.fgv.br/file/view/Mitleton-Kelly,+2003.+Ten+principles+of+complexity+%26+enablinginfrastructures.pdf
Research Group on Complex Collaboration. (n.d.). About us. Retrieved from www.xcollaboration.org
Senger, J. (1980). Individuals, groups, and the organization. Winthrop, MN: Winthrop.
Thomson, A. (2001). Collaboration: Meaning and measurement. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
Thomson, A. M. , & Perry, J. L. (2006, December). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, special issue, 66, 20–32.
Weitz, B. , & Jap, S. D. (1995). Relationship marketing and distribution channels. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, September 1995, 23, 305.
Wenger, E. & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2006) Introduction to communities of practice. wenger-trayner.com . 2006. Web. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Postscript from the Editors
Postscript from the Editors
In this chapter, Myatt summarizes foundational scholarship that undergirds collaborative practices presented in subsequent chapters of this volume. As Myatt explains, historically, writing center and program work has often been dismissed as water cooler lore, stories of oppression, or isolated tales of familiar practice. Truly original and daring WPA work sometimes gets lost or overlooked when not connected to rigorous scholarship or assessment research. While we are quick to praise and privilege programmatic innovations answering community exigencies and grounded in the kairotic moment, in this chapter, we find sources and resources for connecting local acts of collaborative writing program administration to theoretical tenets. The result is programmatic advances that can be replicated and easily justified to stakeholders and funding agencies, higher administration officials, and legislative bodies. We hope that as you read the following narratives of successes and failures, processes and products associated with crafting institutional and community partnerships, you will begin to see liminal spaces in your own institutions and communities where complex collaborations might be forged and enacted. Praxis—the practical application of theory—is our goal in this collection, suggesting a wide range of possible plans for building writing partnerships.
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Myatt, A.J. (2017). Enacting Partnerships: Writing Programs, Writing Centers, and the Collaboration Continuum. In: Myatt, A., Gaillet, L. (eds) Writing Program and Writing Center Collaborations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59932-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59932-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59931-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59932-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)