Skip to main content
  • 6839 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I overview current research issues in L2 pragmatic learning, instruction, and assessment. The chapter begins by discussing how pragmatic competence has been conceptualized under various theoretical and analytical frameworks and then examines the recent development of data collection methods in pragmatics research focusing on how pragmatic competence has been operationalized. Two example studies are discussed to illustrate the distinct data collection and analytical approaches in L2 pragmatics research. Along with the conceptual and methodological issues, the chapter offers a survey of research issues in pragmatic learning, instruction, and assessment, in each case synthesizing the research findings available across diverse contexts focusing on current research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alcón-Soler, E. (2015). Pragmatic learning and study abroad: Effects of instruction and length of stay. System, 48, 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C. (2012). Proficiency and sequential organization of L2 requests. Applied Linguistics, 33, 42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C. (2015). The development of requests by L2 learners of modern standard Arabic: A longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Foreign Language Annals, 48, 570–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). The interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49, 677–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2012). Formulas, routines, and conventional expressions in pragmatics research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 206–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63, 68–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Griffin, R. (2005). L2 pragmatic awareness: Evidence from the ESL classroom. System, 30, 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. S. (Eds.). (2005). Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bella, S. (2012). Pragmatic development in a foreign language: A study of Greek FL requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1917–1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belz, J. A. (2007). The role of computer mediation in the instruction and development of L2 pragmatic competence. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 45–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. D. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. (1997). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eslami, Z. R., Mirzaei, A., & Dini, S. (2015). The role of asynchronous computer mediated communication in the instruction and development of EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. System, 48, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2010). Data collection methods in speech act performance: DCTs, role plays, and verbal reports. In E. Usó Juán & A. Martinex-Flor (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. M., & Houck, N. (1999). Interlanguage refusals: A cross-cultural study of Japanese-English. Berlin: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golato, A. (2003). Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics, 24, 90–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, K. (2009). Investigating the construct validity of a test designed to measure grammatical and pragmatic knowledge in the context of speaking. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassall, T. (2015). Individual variation in L2 study-abroad outcomes: A case study from Indonesian pragmatics. Multilingua, 34, 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, T., Detmer, E., & Brown, J. D. (1995). Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics (Technical Report #7). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huth, T. (2010). Can talk be inconsequential? Social and interactional aspects of elicited second-language interaction. Modern Language Journal, 94, 537–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, E. H., & Kaya, T. (2006). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development: A meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 165–211). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G. (2006). Speech acts in interaction: Towards discursive pragmatics. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, J. C. Félix-Brasdefer, & A. S. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 11, pp. 281–314). University of Hawai’i at Manoa, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G. (2009). L2 pragmatic development. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), New handbook of second language acquisition. Leeds, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics: An introduction. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 3–17). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G., & Dahl, M. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 215–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G., & Roever, C. (2005). Pragmatics in second language learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language learning and teaching (pp. 317–334). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2014). Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 171–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G., & Youn, S. J. (2017). Transforming instruction to activity: Roleplay in language assessment. Applied Linguistics Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2014). How Korean EFL learners understand sarcasm in L2 English. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. (2014). The effects of different levels of linguistic proficiency on the development of L2 Chinese request production during study abroad. System, 45, 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2006). Measuring interlanguage pragmatic knowledge of EFL learners. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw, K. J., Derwing, T. M., & Abbott, M. L. (2010). Teaching pragmatics to L2 learners for the workplace: The job interview. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 739–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. T. M., Do, T. T. H., & Nguyen, A. T. (2015). Teaching email requests in the academic context: A focus on the role of corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 24, 169–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada, Y. (2010). Role-plays in oral proficiency interviews: Interactive footing and interactional competencies. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1647–1668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roever, C. (2005). Testing ESL pragmatics. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roever, C. (2011). Testing of second language pragmatics: Past and future. Language Testing, 28, 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roever, C., Fraser, C., & Elder, C. (2014). Testing ESL sociopragmatics: Development and validation of a web-based test battery. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, K. R., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2001). Pragmatics and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2013). Assessing second language pragmatics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauer, G. (2009). Interlanguage pragmatic development: The study abroad context. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydorenko, T. (2015). The use of computer-delivered structured tasks in pragmatic instruction: An exploratory study. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12, 333–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, J. (2013). Multiuser virtual environments: Learner apologies in Spanish. In N. Taguchi & J. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 71–100). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, N. (2005). Comprehension of implied meaning in English as a second language. Modern Language Journal, 89, 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48, 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y. (Eds.). (2018). Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, N., & Sykes, J. (Eds.). (2013). Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, F. S. (2007). A conversation-analytic hermeneutic rating protocol to assess L2 oral pragmatic competence. Language Testing, 24, 155–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita, S. O. (1996). Six measures of JSL pragmatics (Technical Report #14). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn, S. J. (2014). Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 pragmatic production: Investigating relationships among pragmatics, grammar, and proficiency. System, 42, 270–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn, S. J. (2015). Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. Language Testing, 32, 199–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn, S. J., & Brown, J. D. (2013). Item difficulty and heritage language learner status in pragmatic tests for Korean as a foreign language. In S. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp. 98–123). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soo Jung Youn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Youn, S.J. (2018). Second Language Pragmatics. In: Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., Starfield, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_38

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59899-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59900-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics