Skip to main content

Abstract

While the field of language policy and planning (LPP) has enjoyed a robust and diverse theoretical history, research methods have received less attention. However, we have entered a phase in the field when scholarship is more explicitly foregrounding how particular research methods can be leveraged to illuminate the multiple layers of LPP creation, interpretation, and appropriation. In this chapter, we review the conceptual and methodological development in LPP, focusing on four distinct eras of LPP research. We trace the trends and changes in LPP methodology beginning with the pioneers of the field, through a critical period that incorporated an emphasis on power, and ending with the “empirical turn,” which has been bolstered by increasingly sophisticated LPP-specific research methods. A common goal, we argue, is the interest in making connections between the “macro” and the “micro”—across diverse layers and levels, institutional contexts, and discursive scales—in an attempt to understand how language policies and plans impact social practices. At the same time, definitions of “language policy” have evolved, with research methods following their lead. We examine the challenges and controversies engendered by changing conceptualizations and argue that the field will continue to grow conceptually and methodologically, yield valuable insight into LPP processes around the world, and promote social justice and language diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amir, A., & Musk, N. (2013). Language policing: Micro-level language policy-in-process in the foreign language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 4, 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barakos, E. (2016). Language policy and critical discourse studies: Towards a combined approach. In E. Barakos & J. W. Unger (Eds.), Discursive approaches to language policy (pp. 23–49). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacina-Pugh, F. (2012). Researching ‘practiced language policies’: Insights from conversation analysis. Language Policy, 11, 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S., & Stanley, P. (2015). Ethical considerations in language policy research. In F. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 33–44). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chimbutane, F. (2011). Rethinking bilingual education in postcolonial contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cincotta-Segi, A. (2009). ‘The big ones swallow the small ones.’ Or do they? The language policy and practice of ethnic minority education in the Lao PDR: A case study from Nalae. Ph.D. Thesis. Canberra: The Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cincotta-Segi, A. (2011). Talking in, talking around and talking about the L2: Three literacy teaching responses to L2 medium of instruction in the Lao PDR. Compare, 41(2), 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobarrubias, J. (1983). Ethical issues in status planning. In J. Cobarrubias & J. A. Fishman (Eds.), Progress in language planning: International perspectives (pp. 41–85). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. A. (1999). Dynamics of indigenous language maintenance. In T. Huebner & K. A. Davis (Eds.), Sociopolitical perspectives on language policy and planning in the USA (pp. 67–98). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Costa, P. I. (2010). Language ideologies and standard English language policy in Singapore: Responses of a “designer immigrant” student. Language Policy, 9, 217–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Costa, P. I. (2014). Making ethical decisions in an ethnographic study. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, J., Ferguson, C. A., & Das Gupta, J. (Eds.). (1968). Language problems of developing nations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, J. A. (1994). Critiques of language planning: A minority languages perspective. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 15, 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. D. (1998). Bilingual education and social change. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grin, F. (2003). Language planning and economics. Current Issues in Language Planning, 4, 1–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grin, F., & Vaillancourt, F. (2015). The economics of language policy: An introduction to evaluation work. In F. M. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 21–32). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, E. (1959). Planning for a standard language in Norway. Anthropological Linguistics, 1, 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, E. (1983). The implementation of corpus planning: Theory and practice. In J. Cobarrubias & J. A. Fishman (Eds.), Progress in language planning: International perspectives (pp. 269–290). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. (2011). Paths to post-nationalism: A critical ethnography of language and identity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, M. (2012). Arizona’s teacher policies and their relationship with English learner instructional practice. Language Policy, 11, 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, N. H. (1998). Language policy, language education, language rights: Indigenous, immigrant, and international perspectives. Language in Society, 27, 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 509–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, F. (2015). Making policy connections across scales using nexus analysis. In F. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 217–232). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, F. M. (2010). Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2010, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, F. M. (2014). Drive-thru linguistic landscaping: Constructing a linguistically dominant place in a bilingual space. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 507–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, F. M., & Johnson, D. C. (Eds.). (2015). Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C. (2009). Ethnography of language policy. Language Policy, 8, 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and the ethnography of language policy. Critical Discourse Studies, 8, 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C. (2013). Positioning the language policy arbiter: Governmentality and footing in the School District of Philadelphia. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 116–136). London and New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C. (2015). Intertextuality and language policy. In F. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 166–181). Wiley Blackwell: Malden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C. (2017). Critical ethnography of language policy: A semi-confessional tale. In M. Martin-Jones & D. Martin (Eds.), Researching multilingualism: Critical and ethnographic approaches (pp. 105–120). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C., & Johnson, E. J. (2015). Power and agency in language policy appropriation. Language Policy, 14, 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C., & Ricento, T. (2013). Conceptual and theoretical perspectives in language planning and policy: Situating the ethnography of language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 219, 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. J. (2012). Arbitrating repression: Language policy and education in Arizona. Language and Education, 26, 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karjalainen, M. (2016). Language policy as a sociocultural tool: Insights from the University of Cape Town. Higher Education Policy, 29, 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, K. A. (2013). A tale of three sisters: Language ideologies, identities, and negotiations in a bilingual, transnational family. International Multilingual Research Journal, 7, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloss, H. (1969). Research possibilities on group bilingualism: A report. Quebec: International Center for Research on Bilingualism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochenov, D., & de Varennes, F. (2015). Language and law. In F. M. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 56–66). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. S. (2009). Language, identity, and power: Navajo and Pueblo young adults’ perspectives and experiences with competing language ideologies. Journal of Language Identity Education, 8, 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, A. M. (2015). Researcher positionality. In F. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 4–21). Wiley Blackwell: Malden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, S. (2005). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Jones, M. (2015). Multilingual classroom discourse as a window on wider social, political and ideological processes. In N. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 446–460). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, S. (2008). Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism, and the politics of language. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, T. L. (Ed.). (2011). Ethnography and language policy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, T. L., Collins, J., & Hopson, R. K. (2011). Dell Hymes and the new language policy studies: Update from an underdeveloped country. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 42, 335–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menken, K., & García, O. (Eds.). (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers (pp. 249–261). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, K. S. (2013). Communicative event chains in an ethnography of Paraguayan language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 219, 67–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, K. S. (2016). Producing change and stability: A scalar analysis of Paraguayan bilingual education policy implementation. Linguistics and Education, 34, 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, K. S., & Wortham, S. (2015). Analyzing language policy and social identification across heterogeneous scales. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 160–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, L. (2011). English language ideologies in the Chinese foreign language education policies: A world-system perspective. Language Policy, 10, 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Milans, M. (2012). “Ah! Spain, that’s far away from China ” Reflexividad metodológica y movilidad en la etnografía sociolingüística crítica. Spanish in Context, 9, 219–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Milans, M. (2015). Language education policy in late modernity:(Socio) linguistic ethnographies in the European Union. Language Policy, 14, 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phyak, P. (2013). Language ideologies and local languages as the medium-of-instruction policy: A critical ethnography of a multilingual school in Nepal. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14, 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, V. (2006). Of texts AND translations AND rhizomes: Postcolonial anxieties AND deracinations AND knowledge constructions. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 3, 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, V. (2011). Researching-texting tensions in qualitative research: Ethics in and around textual fidelity, selectivity, and translations. In T. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 255–270). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4, 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. K., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 401–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J., & Jernudd, B. H. (Eds.). (1971). Can language be planned? Sociolinguistic theory and practice for developing nations. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal/National Association for Bilingual Education, 8, 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoba, J. A., & Chimbutane, F. (Eds.). (2013). Bilingual education and language policy in the global south (Vol. 4). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D. (Eds.) (2009). Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonntag, S. (2009). Linguistic globalization and the call center industry: Imperialism, hegemony or cosmopolitanism? Language Policy, 8, 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, C., & Johnson, D. C. (2015). “Good teaching for all students?”: Sheltered instruction programming in Washington state language policy. Language and Education, 29, 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauli, V. (1974). The theory of language planning. In J. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in language planning (pp. 69–78). City: Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (2002). Introduction: Critical issues in educational language policy. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 3–16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 42–59). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (2013). Language policy in a time of crisis and transformation. In J. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 11–34). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (2015). Historical-structural analysis. In F. M. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 21–32). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, T. G., & Wright, W. E. (2004). Against the undertow: Language-minority education policy and politics in the “age of accountability”. Educational Policy, 18, 142–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortham, S., & Reyes, A. (2015). Discourse analysis beyond the speech event. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Cassels Johnson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, D.C., Stephens, C. (2018). Language Policy and Planning. In: Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., Starfield, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_37

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59899-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59900-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics