Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter explores Interaction Analysis, a methodology used to examine the sequential development of turn-taking in interaction in order to understand how interlocutors create and/or transform social order in interaction. In focusing on the application of Interaction Analysis in language learning research, this chapter discusses its utility for examining how language learning is practiced, afforded, and constrained in specific situations and how individuals demonstrate learning through their changing participation in particular discursive practices, as coconstructed activity. It points to continued challenges for Interaction Analysis researchers who seek to better understand how translingual practices and digitally mediated interactions are implicated in language learning processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bamberg, M. G. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 335–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (2014). Theorizing a competence for translingual practice at the contact zone. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (pp. 78–102). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, K., & Zuengler, J. (Eds.). (2008). The research process in classroom discourse analysis: Current perspectives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2015). Translanguaging and identity in educational settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1982). Audiovisual records as a primary data source. Sociological Methods & Research, 11(2), 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F., & Mohatt, J. (1982). Cultural organization of participant structures in two classrooms of Indian students. In B. Spindler (Ed.), Doing the ethnography of schooling (pp. 132–174). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskildsen, S. W. (2012). L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62(2), 335–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C. E., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2004). Conversation and phonetics: Essential connections. In E. Couper-Kkuhlen & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation (pp. 3–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C. E., & Wagner, J. (1996). Interaction-based studies of language. Pragmatics, 6(3), 277–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcez, P. M. (1997). Microethnography. In N. H. Hornberger & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 187–196). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • García, O., & Flores, N. (2014). Multilingualism and common core state standards in the United States. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (pp. 147–166). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. (2004). Conversation analysis and input-interaction. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 597–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D., Stommel, W., Paulus, T., Lester, J., & Reed, D. (2015). Microanalysis of online data: The methodological development of “digital CA”. Discourse, Context & Media, 7, 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hellermann, J., & Harris, K. A. (2015). Navigating the language-learning classroom without previous schooling. In D. A. Koike & C. S. Blyth (Eds.), Dialogue in multilingual and multimodal communities (pp. 49–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1964). Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist, 66(6), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social interaction, 28(3), 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcript notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. ix–xvi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2010). The case for an eclectic approach to discourse-in-interaction. In J. Streeck (Ed.), New adventures in language and interaction (pp. 71–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P., Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T. (2014). Tracing an L2 learner’s motion constructions over time: A usage-based classroom investigation. Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 612–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, A. (2010). Researching intercultural communication: Discourse tactics in non-egalitarian contexts. In J. Streeck (Ed.), New adventures in language and interaction (pp. 125–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition: Second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2007). Disinventing and reinventing languages. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, S. (Ed.). (2014). The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1981). Ethnography of bilingual education. In H. T. Trueba, G. P. Guthrie, & K. H. Au (Eds.), Culture and the bilingual classroom: Studies in classroom ethnography (pp. 36–55). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, J., & Potter, J. (2013). Conversation analysis and electronic interactions: Methodological, analytic and technical considerations. In H. L. Lim & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Innovative methods and technologies for electronic discourse analysis (pp. 370–393). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messina Dahlberg, G., & Bagga-Gupta, S. (2014). Understanding glocal learning spaces. An empirical study of languaging and transmigrant positions in the virtual classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(4), 468–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael-Luna, S., & Canagarajah, S. (2008). Multilingual academic literacies: Pedagogical foundations for code meshing in primary and higher education. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. R., & Zuenger, J. (2011). Negotiating access to learning through resistance to classroom practice. Modern Language Journal, 95(S), 130–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, J., & Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. Developmental pragmatics, 10(1), 43–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L. (2014). Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (pp. 32–53). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Milans, M. (2016). Language and identity in linguistic ethnography. In S. Preece (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 83–97). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rampton, B. (2015). Contemporary urban vernaculars. In J. Nortier & B. A. Svendsen (Eds.), Language, youth and identity in the 21st century: Linguistic practices across urban spaces (pp. 24–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rampton, B., Tusting, K., Maybin, J., Barwell, R., Creese, A., & Lytra, V. (2004). UK linguistic ethnography: A discussion paper. Retrieved from www.ling-ethnog.org.uk

  • Rymes, B. (2016). Classroom discourse analysis: A tool for critical reflection (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seedhouse, P. (2004). Conversation analysis methodology. Language Learning, 54(S1), 1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selting, M., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (Eds.). (2001). Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sert, O., & Seedhouse, P. (2011). Introduction: Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Language Teaching, 5(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sindoni, M. G. (2014). Spoken and written discourse in online interactions: A multimodal approach. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, J. (Ed.). (2010). New adventures in language and interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, J., & Mehus, S. (2005). Microethnography: The study of practices. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 381–404). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L., Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2015). Technologies, identities, and expressive activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toohey, K., & Dagenais, D. (2015). Videomaking as sociomaterial assemblage. Language and Education, 29(4), 302–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trognon, A., & Batt, M. (2010). Interlocutory logic: A unified framework for studying conversational interaction. In J. Streeck (Ed.), New adventures in language and interaction (pp. 9–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. F. (2008). Language and interaction. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. F., & Miller, E. R. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 519–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, D., Newgarden, K., & Young, M. F. (2012). Multimodal analysis of language learning in s play: Languaging as values-realizing. ReCALL, 24(3), 339–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth R. Miller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, E.R. (2018). Interaction Analysis. In: Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., Starfield, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_27

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59899-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59900-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics