Abstract
Brylla’s practice-led research aims to generate alternative portrayals of blindness that deviate from common media stereotypes that are inscribed in a film’s narrative and aesthetics, and that operate through the emphasis of binaries, such as blindness-vision, deviant-normal and them-us. Reflecting an ableist ideology, the formation and maintenance of these stereotypes inform, and are informed by, the sociocultural knowledge shared by filmmakers and spectators. His film practice attempts to reconfigure such preconceived knowledge in the spectator by filming blind people’s ordinary and subjective experiences. Analysing a range of filmic techniques in his films, the chapter proposes that ordinariness and subjectivity can be effectively mediated to the spectator through mapping corporeal relationships to everyday objects and domestic spaces.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Highmore (2011, p. 2) holds that the terms ‘everyday’ and ‘ordinary/ordinariness’ are synonymous, and this chapter follows suit by using the terms interchangeably.
Bibliography
Badia Corbella, M. and Sánchez-Guijo Acevedo, F. (2010). ‘The Representation of People with Visual Impairment in Films’. Journal of Medicine and Movies, 6(2), 69–77.
Barnes, C. (1992). Disabling Imagery and the Media. Krumlin: Ryburn Publishing.
Baudrillard, J. (2005). The System of Objects. London: Verso.
Bordwell, D. and Thompson, K. (2008). Film Art: An Introduction, 8th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chemel, T. n.d. ‘In Search of the Ordinary’. Available at: http://blindnessandarts.com/papers/TashaChemel2.htm (accessed 22 March 2017).
Cutting, J.E. and Armstrong, K.L. (2016). ‘Facial Expression, Size, and Clutter: Inferences’. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 78(3), 891–901.
Douglas, M. (1991). ‘The Idea of a Home: A Kind of Space’. Social Research, 58(1), 287–307.
Fuery, P. (2011). ‘Sublime Acts: The Fate of Resistance between Film Theory and Practice’ in Myer, C. (ed.) Critical Cinema: Beyond the Theory of Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 83–98.
Gallagher, S. and Zahavi, D. (2008). The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. Abingdon: Routledge.
Gibson, J.J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hartley, J. (2003). A Short History of Cultural Studies. London: SAGE.
Highmore, B. (2011). Ordinary Lives. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hill, J. and Church Gibson, P. (1998). The Oxford Guide to Film Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Imrie, R. (2004). ‘Disability, Embodiment and the Meaning of the Home’. Housing Studies, 19(5), 745–763.
Kristin Thompson, D.B. (2003). Film History: An Introduction, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
MacDougall, D. (1998). Transcultural Cinema. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Markotić, N. (2008). ‘Punching up the Story: Disability and Film’. Canadian Journal of Film Studies, 17(1), 2–10.
Markotić, N. (2012). ‘Play the Facts and the Truth: Disability in Documentary Film’. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 1(2), Online article: http://cjds.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/cjds/article/view/40.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Miller, D. (2001) ‘Behind Closed Doors’, in Miller, D. (ed.) Home Possessions, Oxford: Berg, pp. 1–19.
Miller, D. (2010). Stuff. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mitchell, D.T. and Snyder, S.L. (2000). Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Morley, D. (2000). Home Territories. London: Routledge.
Moskowitz, G. B. (2005). Social Cognition: Understanding Self and Others. New York: Guilford Press.
Nash, K. (2011). ‘Documentary-for-the-Other: Relationships, Ethics and (Observational) Documentary’. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 26(3), 224–239.
Nichols, B. (2001). Introduction to Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Plantinga, C. (1999). ‘The Scene of Empathy and the Human Face on Film’ in Plantinga, C. and Smith, G. M. (eds.) Passionate Views. Film, Cognition, and Emotion. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 239–255.
Plantinga, C. (2011). ‘Folk Psychology for Film Critics and Scholars’. Projections, 5(2), 26–50.
Pointon, A. (1997). ‘Disability and Documentary’ in Pointon. A. and Davies, C. (eds.) Framed: Interrogating Disability in the Media. London: British Film Institute, pp. 84–92.
Rodas, J. M. (2009). ‘On Blindness’. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 3(2), 115–130.
Schillmeier, M. (2006). ‘Othering Blindness: On Modern Epistemological Politics’. Disability and Society, 21(5), 471–484.
Shakespeare, T. (1999). ‘Art and Lies? Representations of Disability on Film’ in Corker, M. and French, S. (eds.) Disability Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 164–172.
Smith, T.J. (2013). ‘Watching You Watch Movies: Using Eye Tracking to Inform Film Theory’ in Shimamura, A. P. (ed.) Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 165–191.
Stock, R. and Ochsner, B. (2013). ‘Translations of Blind Perception in the Films Monika (2011) and Antoine (2008)’. InVisible Culture: An Electronic Journal for Visual Culture, 19. [Online]. Available at: https://ivc.lib.rochester.edu/translations-of-blind-perception-in-the-films-monika-2011-and-antoine-2008/ [accessed 31 March 2014].
Sugiyama, A. (2007). ‘Wanderer unter dem Regenbogen – Die Rückenfigur Caspar David Friedrichs’. PhD, Freie Universität Berlin. Berlin: s.n. [Online]. Available at: http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/diss/receive/FUDISS_thesis_000000010089 [accessed 31 March 2014].
Thompson, K. and Bordwell, D. (2003). Film History: An Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tilley, C. (2006). ‘Objectification’ in Tilley, C., Keane, W., Küchler, S., Rowlands, M. and Spyer, P. (eds.) Handbook of Material Culture. London: SAGE Publications, pp. 60–73.
Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and Place. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wayne, M. (1997). Theorising Video Practice. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Young, S. (2014). ‘I’m Not Your Inspiration, Thank You Very Much’. TEDxSydney. [Online]. Available at: https://www.ted.com/talks/stella_young_i_m_not_your_inspiration_thank_you_very_much?language=en [accessed 5 December 2015].
Filmography
Bari, L. (2008). Antoine. Canada. Eye Steel Film.
Brown, M. (2012). High Ground. USA. Khumbu Pictures, Serac Adventure Films, Stone Circle Pictures.
Brylla, C. (2016). Terry. UK.
Brylla, C. (2016). June. UK.
Eichar, D. (2008). Victory Over Darkness. USA.
Jardim, J. and Carvalho, W. (2001). Window of the Soul. Brazil. Copacabana Filmes e Produções, Dueto Filmes, Ravina Filmes, Tibet Filme.
Lovett, J.F. (2010). Going Blind. USA. Lovett Productions.
Middleton, P. and Spinney, J. (2016). Notes on Blindness. UK. Archer’s Mark.
Tarn, G. (2005). Black Sun. USA. Passion Pictures.
Walker, L. (2006). Blindsight. UK/USA. Robson Entertainment.
Yi, S. (2012). Planet of Snail. South Korea. Dalpaengee.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brylla, C. (2017). Spectatorship and Alternative Portrayals of Blindness. In: Brylla, C., Hughes, H. (eds) Documentary and Disability. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59894-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59894-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59893-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59894-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)