Skip to main content

Learning Environments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education Systems and Learners
  • 784 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with learning mechanisms in specialised environments and this calls for an engagement with learning theories. The focus of this chapter then is on learning and this is contextualised in relation to learning theories (i.e. behaviourist, phenomenological, cognitivist, constructivist and materialist), learning models (i.e. assessment for learning, observation, coaching, goal-clarification, mentoring, peer-learning, simulation, instruction, concept-formation, reflection, meta-cognitive learning, problem-solving, and practice) and the many-faceted components of learning environments (i.e. the simulation of the learning object, the representational mode of the object, the amplification of pedagogic resources, control in the pedagogic relationship, progression or relations with other learning objects over time (curriculum integration), relations with other people in the learning process, the organisation of time and pace of development (temporal relations), the type of pedagogic text and the evaluative mode).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alhadeff-Jones, M. (2010). Three generations of complexity theories: Nuances and ambiguities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 66–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey, B., & Cohen, P. (1995). Working wisdom: Timeless skills and vanguard strategies for learning organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflections on activity theory. Education Review, 61(2), 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1985). On pedagogic discourse. In G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research in the sociology of education. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research and critique (Rev. edn.). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (2010). Reclaiming reality (2nd edn.). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Plowright, D. (2010). A multidimensional model of reflective learning for professional development. Reflective Practice, 11(2), 245–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G. (2010). Reflective practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. (2004). The pragmatist enlightenment (and its problematic semantics). European Journal of Philosophy, 12(1), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, D. (1999). Educational research: Pursuit of truth or flight of fancy. British Educational Research Journal, 25(5), 597–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., Fleetwood, S., & Roberts, J. (2002). Critical realism and Marxism. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutterbuck, D., & Megginson, D. (2005). Making coaching work – creating a coaching culture. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., & Sumara, D. J. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (2007). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. (2015). The post-human and responsible experimentation in learning. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The sage handbook of learning. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J., & Lepore, E. (2007). Brandom Beleaguered. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74(3), 677–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, R. (1991). The mindful school: How to integrate the curriculum. Pallantine: Skylight Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. (1985). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. D., & Dalton, D. W. (1993). Feedback and emerging instructional technologies. In J. V. Dempsey & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 263–286). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K., & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning experience as a source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. (2014). Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston, MA: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J., Anderman, E., & Anderman, L. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 487–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962 [1945]). Phenomenology of perception. Trans. C. Smith, New York and London: Humanities Press and Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 27(4), 375–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, D. (2015). Learning, complexity and emergent (irreversible) change. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The sage handbook of learning. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2007). Beyond presence: Epistemological and pedagogical implications of strong emergence. Interchange, 38(1), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1962). The language and thought of the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970). The science of education and the psychology of the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1980). From being to becoming. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saevi, T. (2015). Learning and Pedagogic relations. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The Sage handbook of learning. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the Philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behaviour. Cambridge: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standish, P. (2016). The disenchantment of education and the re-enchantment of the world. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(1), 98–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985). Human agency and language: Philosophical papers 1. Chapter 1: What is human agency? and Chapter 3: Hegel’s philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1998). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2011). Dilemmas and connections. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher Psychological processes. Ed. M. Cole, V. John-Steirner, & S. Scribner. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (1930). Behaviourism. New York: W.W. Norton and Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2008). A social theory of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning…in their own words. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2008). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E., & Demetrio, H. (2007). New teacher learning: Substantive knowledge and contextual factors. The Curriculum Journal, 18(3), 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winogrand, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scott, D. (2017). Learning Environments. In: Education Systems and Learners. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59884-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59884-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59883-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59884-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics