Abstract
This chapter starts by revisiting the Anglo-American debate on Area Studies. After having been exposed to fundamental criticism and its partial replacement by new interdisciplinary study formats, the potential of Area Studies had been rediscovered on the basis of a reassessment of their relationship to disciplinary knowledge production. The author then moves on to outline the epistemological and methodological bases of new Area Studies. At its core is what he refers to as a double-layered hermeneutic circular “motor” involving a highly reflexive and mutually reinforcing determination of four variables: area, theme, perspective and epistemology. The final part of the chapter explains how new Area Studies functions in concrete research. This includes a three-step approach, moving from situational analysis to translation and finally to mid-level analysis based on the coining of middle-range concepts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Anderson, B. (1972). The Idea of Power in Javanese Culture. In C. Holt, B. Anderson, & J. Siegel (Eds.), Culture and Politics in Indonesia (pp. 1–69). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Asad, T. (1985). John Dixon. In F. Baker, P. Hulme, M. Iversen, & D. Loxley (Eds.), Europe and Its Others (pp. 170–177). Colchester: University of Essex.
Birsl, U., & Salzborn, S. (2014). Unwritten Constitutions of Political Rule: Conceptual Approaches to Comparative Area Studies of Asia, the Middle East & North Africa, and Europe. ASIEN, 132, 12–25.
Boeke, J. (1944). The Structure of the Netherlands Indian Economy. New York: Institute of Pacific Relations.
Brody, S. (2005). Towards a Taxonomy of Spatial-Scale Dependence. Ecography, 38(4), 358–369.
Chow, R. (2002). Theory, Area Studies, Cultural Studies: Issues of Pedagogy in Multiculturalism. In M. Miyoshi & H. Harootunian (Eds.), Learning Places. The Afterlives of Area Studies (pp. 103–118). Durham: Duke University Press.
Chuan Yean, S. (2015). Tulong. An Articulation of Politics in the Christian Philippines. Manila: University of Santo Tomas Publishing House.
Clarke, A., Friese, C., & Washburn, R. (Eds.). (2015). Situational Analysis in Practice. Mapping Research with Grounded Theory. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Cooper, F. (2002). Africa Since 1940. The Past of the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Derichs, C. (2014). Theory-Driven Conceptualization and Epistemic Reflection in Comparative Area Studies: Some Thoughts on “Unwritten Constitutions” and Research Designs. ASIEN, 132, 26–34.
Dirlik, A. (2010). Asia Pacific Studies in an Age of Global Modernity. In T. Wesley-Smith & J. Goss (Eds.), Remaking Area Studies. Teaching and Learning across Asia and the Pacific. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Furnivall, J. (1939). Netherlands India: A Study of Plural Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geertz, C. (1980). Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gerke, S. (2000). Global Lifestyles under Local Conditions: The New Indonesian Middle Class. In C. Beng Huat (Ed.), Consumption in Asia. Lifestyle and Identities (pp. 135–158). London: Routledge.
Gluck, C. (2011). The End of Elsewhere: Writing Modernity Now. The American Historical Review, 116(3), 676–687.
Goto-Jones, C. (2011). A Cosmos beyond Space and Area Studies: Toward Comparative Political Thought as Political Thought. Boundary 2, 38(3), 87–118.
Harootunian, H. (2000). History’s Disquiet. Modernity, Cultural Practice and the Question of Everyday Life. New York: Columbia University Press.
Houben, V. (2013). The New Area Studies and Southeast Asian History. DORISEA Working Paper 4, Göttingen.
Jackson, P. (2004). The Thai Regime of Images. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 19(2), 181–218.
Josselin de Jong, P. d. (1980). Minangkabau and Negri Sembilan. Socio-Political Structure in Indonesia. Dordrecht: Springer.
King, V. (2008). The Sociology of Southeast Asia. Transformations in a Developing Region. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
Leiden Institute of Area Studies. (2012). [pdf]. Available at: www.hum2.leidenuniv.nl/pdf/lias/where_is_here_university_institute_for_area_studies_lias_2012.pdf [Accessed 6 May 2014].
Medick-Bachmann, D. (2015). Transnation und translational: Zur Übersetzungsfunktion der Area Studies. CAS Working Paper 1/2015, Berlin.
Niranjana, T. (1992). Siting Translation. Berkely: University of California Press.
Sidaway, J. (2012). Geography, Globalization, and the Problem of Area Studies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(4), 984–1002.
Smith, N. (2010). Remapping Area Knowledge. Beyond Glocal/Local. In T. Wesley-Smith & J. Goss (Eds.), Remaking Area Studies. Teaching and Learning across Asia and the Pacific (pp. 24–40). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Tambiah, S. (1985). Culture, Thought and Social Action. An Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
van Schendel, W. (2005). Geographies of Knowing, Geographies of Ignorance: Jumping Scale in Southeast Asia. In P. Kratoska, R. Raben, & H. Schulte Nordholt (Eds.), Locating Southeast Asia. Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space (pp. 275–307). Leiden: KITLV Press.
Wolters, O. (1982). History, Culture and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Houben, V. (2017). New Area Studies, Translation and Mid-Range Concepts. In: Mielke, K., Hornidge, AK. (eds) Area Studies at the Crossroads. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59834-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59834-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95011-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59834-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)