Skip to main content
  • 562 Accesses

Abstract

The first part of this book provides a literature review pertaining to entrepreneurial newcomers’ resource acquisition and their cognitive social capital when negotiating status and power differentials in bridging structures, but from a communication accommodation theory (CAT) perspective. By and large, the links between status and power and cognitive social capital are understudied. The second part of this book presents research findings to determine how entrepreneurial newcomers attune their cognition in bridging structures through communication accommodation. This chapter brings together the respective parts of the book and illuminates theoretical contributions. In addition, it addresses implications for policy and practice and identifies future research challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, P., Kwon, S. W., & Heckscher, C. (2008). Professional work: The emergence of collaborative economy. Organization Science, 19, 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afuah, A. (2013). Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agndal, H., Chetty, S., & Wilson, H. (2008). Social capital dynamics and foreign market entry. International Business Review, 17, 663–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A., Park, J., & Jack, S. (2007). Entrepreneurial social capital: Conceptualizing social capital in new high-tech firms. International Small Business Journal, 25, 245–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apker, J., Propp, K., & Ford, W. S. (2005). Negotiating status and identity tensions in healthcare team interactions: An exploration of nurse role dialectics. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. (2007). The entrepreneurial society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ayoko, O. B., Hartel, C. E. J., & Callan, V. J. (2002). Resolving the puzzle of productive and destructive conflict in culturally heterogeneous workgroups: A communication accommodation theory approach. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 165–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. (2007). Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauernschuster, S., Falck, O., & Heblich, S. (2010). Social capital access and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76, 821–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (2014). Entrepreneurship, small business and public policy: Evolution and revolution. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., & Zelditch, M. (2002). Construction of status and referential structures. Sociological Theory, 20, 157–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgements of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36, 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, S. C. (2005). Emotion management in the workplace. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22, 1168–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R., & Merluzzi, J. (2014). Embedded brokerage: Hubs versus locals. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 40, 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Innovation and Skills (BIS). (2011). Innovation and research strategy for growth December 2011. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-innovation-and-research-strategy.

  • Business Innovation and Skills (BIS). (2014). Innovation report 2014 – Innovation, research and growth. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/293635/bis-14-p188-innovation-report-2014-revised.pdf.

  • Business Innovation and Skills (BIS). (2015a). 2010 to 2015 government policy: Business enterprise. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-business-enterprise.

  • Business Innovation and Skills (BIS). (2015b). BIS/15/498 enterprise bill: Summary factsheet. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/enterprise-bill-summary-factsheet.

  • Chen, Y. R., Peterson, R. S., Phillips, D. J., Podolny, J., & Ridgeway, C. (2012). Bringing status to the table – Attaining, maintaining, and experiencing status in organizations and markets. Organization Science, 23, 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. (2005). Integrating qualitative and quantitative techniques in network analysis. Qualitative market Research: An International Journal, 8, 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. (2007). The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 713–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daspit, J. J., & Long, R. G. (2014). Mitigating moral hazard in entrepreneurial networks: Examining structural and relational social capital in East Africa. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1343–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCarolis, D. M., & Saparito, P. (2006). Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCarolis, D. M., Litzky, B. E., & Eddleston, K. A. (2009). Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: The influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeClercq, D., & Voronov, M. (2009a). Toward a practice perspective of entrepreneurship. International Small Business Journal, 27, 395–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeClercq, D., & Voronov, M. (2009b). Role of cultural and symbolic capital in entrepreneurs’ ability to meet expectations about conformity and innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 47, 398–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFillippi, R. J., Arthur, M. B., & Lindsay, V. J. (2006). Knowledge at work – Creative collaboration in the global economy. MA and Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duguid, M. M., Loyd, D., & Tolbert, P. (2012). The impact of categorical status, numeric representation, and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others. Organization Science, 23, 386–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission EC. (2013). Entrepreneurship 2020 action plan. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0795:FIN:EN:PDF.

  • Fang, R., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. (2011). The organizational socialization process: Review and development of a social capital model. Journal of Management, 37, 127–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felzensztein, C., Gimmon, E., & Carter, S. (2010). Geographical co-location, social networks and inter-firm marketing co-operation: The case of the Salmon industry. Long Range Planning, 43, 675–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. (2003). Social capital. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, D., & O’Connor, A. J. (2013). Social capital and the networking practices of indigenous entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 51, 276–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y. (2007). Contact diaries: Building archives of actual and comprehensive personal networks. Field Methods, 19, 194–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, S., Sung, M., & Zhang, J. (2011). Risk management capability building in SMEs: A social capital perspective. International Small Business Journal, 31, 677–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedajlovic, E., Honig, B., Moore, C., Payne, T., & Wright, M. (2013). Social capital and entrepreneurship: A schema and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 455–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, G., Dahlander, L., Graffin, S., & Sim, S. (2016). Reputation and status: Expanding the role of social evaluations in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication contexts and consequence. In H. Giles, N. Coupland, & J. Coupland (eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Global Innovation Index GII. (2014). The Global innovation index 2014: The human factor in innovation. Available at https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/reportpdf/GII-2014-v5.pdf.

  • Global Innovation Index GII. (2015). The Global innovation index: Effective innovation policies for development. Available at https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/reportpdf/GII-2015-v5.pdf.

  • Godechot, O. (2008). What do heads of dealing rooms do? The social capital of internal entrepreneurs. Sociological Review, 56, 146–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubbins, C., & Dooley, L. (2014). Exploring social network dynamics driving knowledge management for innovation. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23, 162–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpham, T., Grant, E., & Thomas, E. (2002). Measuring social capital within health surveys: Key issues. Health Policy and Planning, 17, 106–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hite, J. M. (2005). Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29, 113–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins, R. (2010). Forms of network resource: Knowledge access and the role of inter-firm networks. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 335–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2005). Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organization Science, 16, 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innovate UK C16/CO300. (2016). Delivery plan – Financial year 2016/17. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/514838/CO300_Innovate_UK_Delivery_Plan_2016_2017_WEB.pdf.

  • Jack, S., Drakopoulou Dodd, S., & Anderson, A. R. (2008). Change and the development of entrepreneurial networks over time: A processual perspective. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20, 125–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, S. (2015). Entrepreneurs’ network evolution – The relevance of cognitive social capital. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 21, 197–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, S., & Lindbergh, J. (2013). The development of social capital and financing of entrepreneurial firms: From financial bootstrapping to bank funding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 661–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, A., Harmakoorpi, V., & Pihkala, T. (2010). Absorptive capacity and social capital in regional innovation systems: The case of the Lahti region in Finland. Urban Studies, 47, 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. (2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 317–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., Tsai, W., & Hanke, R. (2006). A paradigm too far? A dynamic stability reconsideration of the social network research program. Academy of Management Review, 31, 1031–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., Chiaburu, D. S., & Menges, J. I. (2010). Strategic use of emotional intelligence in organizational settings: Exploring the dark side. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., Crossland, C., Tsai, W., & Bowers, M. T. (2016). Magnification and correction of the acolyte effect: Initial benefits and ex post settling up in NFL coaching careers. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 352–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klyver, K., & Foley, D. (2012). Networking and culture in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24, 561–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korte, R., & Lin, S. (2013). Getting on board: Organizational socialization and the contribution of social capital. Human Relations, 66, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S., & Adler, P. (2014). Social capital: Maturation of a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 39, 412–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. (2009). Social capital and business and management: Setting a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 247–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R., & Jones, O. (2008). Networks, communication, and learning during business start-up: The creation of cognitive social capital. International Small Business Journal, 26, 559–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, I., & Dana, L. P. (2013). Boundaries of social capital in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 603–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhavi, C. V., & Akbar, M. (2011). Groundswell effect part I: A new concept emerging in the world of social networks. Strategic Change, 20, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahnke, V., Wareham, J., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. (2008). Offshore middleman: Transnational intermediation in technology sourcing. Journal of Information Technology, 23, 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, E. (2012). Regional social capital: Why it matters. Regional Studies, 46, 1023–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40, 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. L., & Marzec, P. E. (2012). Social capital, a theory for operations management: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Production Research, 50, 7081–7099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, R. M., & Giles, H. (2006). Communication with people of different ages in the workplace: Thai and American data. Human Communication Research, 32, 74–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeever, E., Jack, S., & Anderson, A. (2015). Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, K., & Harpham, T. (2006). Meanings and uses of social capital in the mental health field. In K. McKenzie & T. Harpham (eds.), Social capital and mental health. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, K. L. (2013). Becoming entrepreneurial: Gaining legitimacy in the nascent phase. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 19, 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, N., & Tully, J. (2007). Regional development agency policy to tackle economic exclusion? The role of social capital in distressed communities. Regional Studies, 41, 855–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1129–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesta. (2011). Vital growth – The importance of high-growth businesses to the recovery. Available at https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/vital_growth.pdf.

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Available at https://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/1913021.pdf.

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2001). The wellbeing of nations. Available at http://www.oecd.org/site/worldforum/33703702.pdf.

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2010). Ministerial report on the OECD innovation strategy – Innovation to strengthen growth and address global and social challenges. Available at https://www.oecd.org/sti/45326349.pdf.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2014). Secretary-general’s report to ministers. Available at http://www.oecd.org/about/secretary-general/SG-Annual-Report-to-Ministers-2014.pdf.

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2015). The missing entrepreneurs – Policies for self-employment and entrepreneurship. Available at http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/employment/the-missing-entrepreneurs-2015_9789264226418-en#page1.

  • Pearce, J. L. (2011). Introduction: The power of status. In J. L. Pearce (ed.), Status in management and organizations. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinnock, A. (2007). New development: The infrastructural aspect of social capital: Suggestions for a bridge between concept and policy. Public Money and Management, 27, 345–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRO INNO EUROPE. (2008). Policies in support of high growth SMEs – Thematic report. Available at proinno.europe.eu/sites/default/files/page/10/07/Thematic_Report_July_2008_-_High_Growth_SMEs.pdf.

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reiche, B. S., Harzing, A. W., & Kraimer, M. L. (2009). The role of international assignees’ social capital in creating intellectual capital: A cross-level model. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 509–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, B., Lyons, T., Ferguson, N., & Polanco, G. (2008). Social capital as social relations: The contribution of normative structures. Sociological Review, 56, 256–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, L. A. (2010). Status distinctions in interaction: Social selection and exclusion at an Elite Nightclub. Qualitative Sociology, 33, 229–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnur, O. (2005). Exploring social capital as an urban neighbourhood resource: Empirical findings and strategic conclusions of a case study in Berlin-Moabit. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie – Royal Dutch Geographical Society, 96, 488–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, W. R. (2005). Continental philosophy – A critical approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33, 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A. (2015). Party on! A call for entrepreneurship research that is more interactive, activity based, cognitively hot, compassionate, and prosocial. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigfusson, T., & Chetty, S. (2013). Building international entrepreneurial virtual networks in cyberspace. Journal of World Business, 48, 260–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. B., Menon, T., & Thompson, L. (2012). Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organization Science, 23, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliz, J., & Giles, H. (2009). Language and communication. In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, & D. Roskos-Ewolsen (eds.), The new SAGE handbook of communication science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staber, U. (2007). Contextualising research on social capital in regional clusters. International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 31, 505–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, W., Arzlanian, S., & Elfring, T. (2014). Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 152–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D., & Greene, F. (2010). Small business and entrepreneurship. Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, L., & Burton, R. (2011). Good farmers, good neighbours? The role of cultural capital in social capital development in a Scottish farming community. Sociologia Ruralis, 51, 238–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, G. L., & Sorensen, J. F. (2007). There’s more to the picture than meets the eye: Measuring tangible and intangible capital in two marginal communities in rural Denmark. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 453–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thye, S. R. (2000). A status value theory of power in exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 65, 407–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trettin, L., & Welter, F. (2011). Challenges for spatially oriented entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23, 575–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Commission for Employment and Skills UKCES. (2011). Skills for self-employment – Evidence report 31. Available at www.ukces.org.uk/publications/er31-skills-for-employment.

  • Uzzi, B., & Dunlap, S. (2005, December). How to build your network. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society – An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F., Trettin, L., & Neumann, U. (2008). Fostering entrepreneurship in distressed urban neighborhoods. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 4, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F. (2011). Contextualising entrepreneurship – Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M., Härtel, C. E. J., & Panipucci, D. (2005). Understanding cross-cultural negotiation: A model integrating affective events theory and communication accommodation theory. In C. E. J. Härtel., W. J. Zerbe., & N. M. Ashkanasy. (eds.), Emotions in organizational behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willem, A., & Scarborough, H. (2006). Social capital and political bias in knowledge sharing: An exploratory study. Human Relations, 59, 1343–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemyns, M., Gallois, C., & Callan, V. J. (2003). Trust me, I’m your boss: Trust and power in supervisor-supervisee communication. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, N., & Huggins, R. (2013). Supporting entrepreneurship in deprived communities: A vision too far? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20, 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, N., & Williams, C. C. (2011). Tackling barriers to entrepreneurship in a deprived urban neighbourhood. Local Economy, 26, 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Work Foundation. (2006). Defining the knowledge economy – Knowledge economy programme report. Available at http://www.theworkfoundation.com/assets/docs/publications/65_defining%20knowledge%20economy.pdf.

  • Work Foundation. (2011). Ready, steady, grow? How the government can support the development of more high growth firms. Available at http://www.theworkfoundation.com/DownloadPublication/Report/285_285_high_growth_firmsFINAL%20FROM%20ANN.pdf.

  • Wright, M., Roper, S., Hart, M., & Carter, S. (2015). Joining the dots: Building the evidence base for SME growth policy. International Small Business Journal, 33, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., & Stigliani, I. (2013). Entrepreneurship and growth. International Small Business Journal, 31, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., Gozubuyuk, R., & Milanov, H. (2010). It’s the connections: The network perspective in interorganizational research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24, 62–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., Wright, M., & Abdelgawad, S. (2014). Contextualisation and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal, 32, 479–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, W. (2010). A social capital perspective of innovation from individuals to nations: Where is empirical literature directing us? International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 151–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adair, W., Buchan, N., Chen, X.P., & Liu, D. (2016). A model of communication context and measure of context dependence. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2, 198–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A., Wallace C., & Townsend, L. (2016). Great expectations or small country living? Enabling small rural creative businesses with ICT. Sociologia Ruralis, 56, 450–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, J., & Reagans, R. (2011). Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 22, 1182–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casciaro, T., Gino, F., & Kouchaki, M. (2014). The contaminating effects of building instrumental ties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 705–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R. & Holt, R. (2009). Strategy without design – The silent efficacy of indirect action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Andreta, D., Marabelli, M.,Newell, S., Scarborough, H., & Swan, J. (2016). Dominant cognitive frames and the innovative power of social networks. Organization Studies, 37, 293–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., & Srivastava, S.B. (2014). Bringing agency back into network research: Constrained agency and network action. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 40, 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hingley, M., Angell, R., & Campelo, A. (2015). Introduction to the special issue on power in business, customer, and market relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 48, 101–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord Young (2015, February). Report on Small Firms 2010–2015. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-on-small-firms-2010-to-2015-by-lord-young.

  • O’Neil, I., & Ucbasaran, D. (2016). Balancing ‘What matters to me’ with ‘what matters to them’: Exploring the legitimation process of environmental entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 31, 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, P., Prenkert, F., Hoholm, T., & Harrison, D. (2014). The dynamics of networked power in a concentrated business network. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2579–2589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, R., & Antonakis, J. (2015). Interpersonal power: A review, critique and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41, 136–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uberbacher, F. (2014). Legitimation of new ventures: A review and research programme. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 667–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wijk, J., Stam, W., Elfring, T., Zietsma, C., & den Hond, F. (2013). Activists and incumbents structuring change: The interplay of agency, culture, and networks. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 358–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westlund, H. (2006). Social capital in the knowledge economy. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, R. (2017). Conclusion. In: The Social Capital of Entrepreneurial Newcomers. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59820-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics