Skip to main content

The Catch-Up Process in the Korean Steel Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Varieties and Alternatives of Catching-up

Part of the book series: IDE-JETRO Series ((IDE))

Abstract

This chapter examines how South Korea’s steel industry caught up with the Japanese steel industry technologically by focusing on the relationship between the phases of innovation, the speed of technological catch-up, and institutions. Two large waves of innovation occurred in the industry after World War II. Korean steel companies succeeded in accelerating the catching-up process by concentrating their investment at specific phases of each innovation cycle. In the first wave of innovation, South Korea concentrated its investment on the construction of integrated steelworks by establishing the state-owned monopoly firm, POSCO. In the second wave, the market entry of Hyundai Motor Group through vertical integration and POSCO’s countermeasure allowed for developing high-quality steel sheets, which further pushed forward the catching-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tanaka also has regarded Gwangyang Work as a sophisticated version of the mass production system developed by Japanese companies, which focuses on the factory layout (Tanaka 2008).

  2. 2.

    Kawabata called the mass production system developed by Japanese companies after World War II ‘a second-generation integrated production system’. The system of development and production of high-quality steel was based on the same major facilities as those of the second generation, but realized flexible production. So Kawabata called this new system ‘generation 2.5’ (Kawabata 2012).

  3. 3.

    However, for some grades of steel sheet, the amount required by automobile affiliate companies of the Hyundai Motor Group is too small for the steel affiliates to manufacture profitably. So the group does not plan to develop and manufacture all the grades of steel sheet which its automobile affiliate companies need (Interview at Hyundai Motor Group on 25 November 2010).

  4. 4.

    POSCO has organized Early Vendor Involvement activity with over 10 automakers, including the Hyundai Motor Group.

  5. 5.

    Interview at the Oppama Factory of Nissan Motors on 21 May 2009.

  6. 6.

    Recently, some automobile makers have begun to review the degree of usage of high-tensile steel in their models in order to reduce costs. The model for whose production Nissan Motors moved to Thailand in 2010 was designed so that it could be manufactured with high-tensile steel of relatively low strength. This enabled POSCO to increase the amount of steel sheet sold to Nissan.

  7. 7.

    As for the development of FINEX, see Song and Song (2010) and Lee and Park (2010).

References

  • Abernathy, W.J., and J.M. Utterback. 1978. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review 80(7): 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A.H. 1989. Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Costa, A.P. 1999. The global restructuring of the steel industry: Innovations, institutions and industrial change. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Enos, J.L., and W.-H. Park. 1988. The adoption and diffusion of imported technology: The case of Korea. London: Croom Helm.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto T., G. Dong, and O. Jewheon. 2006. Competition and co-operation in automobile steel sheet production in East Asia. MMRC discussion paper no. 73. Manufacturing Management Research Center, University of Tokyo, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic backwardness in historical perspective. New York: Praegar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto, J. 2001. Sengo Nihon Keizai no Seichou Kōzō: Kigyō Shisutemu to Sangyō Seisaku no Bunseki [The growth structure of the Japanese economy after World War II: The analysis of corporate system and industrial policy]. Tokyo: Yuhikaku (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, N.S., and POSCO Staff. 2009. Ganghan hyeonjangi ganghan gieobeul mandeunda [Strong shop floor makes strong firm]. Seoul: Gimmyoung Publishers (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyundai Hysco. 2005. Hyundai Hysco 20 nyeonsa [The 20 years history of Hyundai Hysco]. Seoul: Hyundai Hysco (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Inagaki, K. 1997. Purosesu-konpyūta to Kūrā Kotohajime [The beginning of process computer and cooler]. In Hokō-seitetsu no Kensetsu Kaikoroku [Memories of the construction of Pohang Works], ed. Yoboseyokai. Tokyo: Yoboseyokai (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, Y. 1994. Nihon no Tekkōgyō to CIM [The Japanese iron and steel industry and CIM]. In Gijutsu to Sangyō Shakai [Technology and industrial society], ed. Dōshisha Daigaku Jinbun Kagaku Kenkyūsho. Tokyo: Chuokeizai-sha (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Itami, Y., and Itami Laboratory. 1997. Nihon no Tekkōgyō: Naze Ima mo Sekai-ichi nanoka [The Japanese iron and steel industry: Why still No.1 in the world?]. Tokyo: NTT Publishing (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamioka, K. 2005. Sengo Nihon Tekkōgyō no Dainamizumu [The dynamism of the Japanese iron and steel industry after World War II]. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Hyoronsha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawabata, N. 1995. Nihon Kōro-mēkā ni okeru Seihin-kaihatsu: Kyōsō Seisan Shisutemu to no Kakawaride [Product development of Japanese blast furnace steel manufacturer: The relationship with competition and production system]. In Nihon Kigyō no Kenkyū-kaihatsu Shisutemu: Senryaku to Kyōsō [The research and development system of Japanese companies: Strategy and competition], ed. Economic Institute of Osaka City University, Y. Akaishi, and H. Ueta. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawabata, N. 2006. Nihon Kōro-mēkā no Kōkyūkō Senryaku: Sono Kenjitsusa to Hoshusei [The strategy for high-quality steel in Japanese blast furnace steel manufacturers: Its consistency and conservativeness]. Sangyo Gakkaiho [The Society for Industrial Studies, Japan] 21: 35–47 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawabata, N. 2012. A comparative analysis of integrated iron and steel companies in East Asia. The Keizai Gaku [Annual Report of the Economic Society, Tohoku University] 73(1/2): 165–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, L. 1997. Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. and M. Park. 2010. Gisulhyeoksin Giban eui Jeonryakjeok Byeonhwa: POSCO eui FINEX Gisulgebal [Strategic change based on technological innovation: POSCO’s FINEX development]. Gyoengyeong Gyoyuk Yeongu 14(1): 150–176 (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, L.H. 1982. How Japan innovates: A comparison with the U.S. in the case of oxygen steelmaking. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa, Y. 1997. Daiichi Kōro no Hiire no Koro wo Omou[Thinking back the blowing-in at no.1 blast furnace]. In Hokō-seitetsu no Kensetsu Kaikoroku [Memories of the construction of Pohang Works], ed. Yoboseyokai. Tokyo: Yoboseyokai (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakaoka, T., and M. Usuda. 2002. Jidōsha-you Reien Usukōhan no Hatten [The development of cold rolled steel sheet for automobile]. In Sengo Nippon no Gijutu Keisei: Mohō ka Sōzō ka [Technology formation in Japan after World War II: Imitation or innovation?], ed. T. Nakaoka. Nihon Keizai Hyoronsha: Tokyo (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nippon Steel (ed.). 2004. Karā Zukai Tetsu to Tekkō ga Wakaru Hon [Color graphic illustration: Understanding iron and steel]. Tokyo: Nippon Jitsugyo Publishing (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohang Iron and Steel. 1993. Yeongil wan eseo Guwangyan wan kaji: Pohang Joecheol 25 nyeonsa [From Yeongil Gulf to Guwangyan Gulf: The 25 years history of Pohang Iron and Steel]. Pohang: Pohang Iron and Steel (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • POSCO. 2004. Posko 35 nyeonsa [The 35 years history of POSCO]. Seoul: POSCO (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sei, K. 1990. Aimai na Hacchū, Mugen no Yōkyū ni yoru Hinshitsu/Gijutsu Suijun no Kōjō [The enhancement of quality and technology level through ambiguous order and infinite request]. In Jidōsha Sangyō no Kokusaika to Seisan Shisutemu, [The internationalization of automobile industry and production system], ed. Institute of Economic Research, Chuo University. Tokyo: Chuo University Press (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J.-S. 1996. The economics of the late comers: Catching-up, technology transfer and institutions in Germany, Japan and South Korea. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, S.S. 2002. Hanguk Cheolgang sanop ui gisul Neungryeok Baljeong Gwajeong: 1960–1990 nyeon dae ui Pohang Jhoecheol [The development process of technology capability in the Korean steel industry: Pohang steel in 1960–1990]. The Ph.D dissertation, Seoul National University) (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, S.S. and U. Song. 2010. Koroekseu oeseo Painoekseu ro: Poseuko ui Gyeongro Sirhyeonhyeong gisur Hyeoksin [From COREX to FINEX: POSCO’s pass-realization-type innovation]. Gisulhyeoksinhakhoeji 13(4): 700–716 (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, A. 2008. Tekkō: Nihon Moderu no Hakyū to Kakusan [Iron and steel: Spin-off and diffusion of the Japanese model]. In Higashi Ajia Yūi Sangyou no Kyōsōryoku: Sono Yōin to Kyōsō/Bungyō Kōzō [Competitive advantage of East Asian industries: Its causes and competition and division-of-labor structure], ed. H. Shioji. Kyoto: Minerva Shobo (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J.M. 1994. Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonekura, S. 1986. Tekkōgyō ni okeru Inobēshon Dōnyū Purosesu: Renzoku Chūuzō Setubi Dōnyū Purosesu no Nichibei Hikaku [Adoption process of innovation in steel industry: The comparison between Japan and U.S. about the adoption process of continuous casting facility]. In Inobēishon to Soshiki [Innovation and organization], ed. K. Imai. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimura, Y. 2005. Atsuen Setsubi Monozukuri sono 4 [Rolling equipment manufacturing no.4]. Keiki Tanshin 19: 3–5 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 IDE-JETRO

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abe, M. (2016). The Catch-Up Process in the Korean Steel Industry. In: Sato, Y., Sato, H. (eds) Varieties and Alternatives of Catching-up. IDE-JETRO Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59780-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59780-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59779-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59780-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics