Skip to main content

The Development of the Indian Software Services Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Varieties and Alternatives of Catching-up

Part of the book series: IDE-JETRO Series ((IDE))

  • 408 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter illustrates that the software services industry in India is the largest in the developing world and that the leading Indian software firms have been successfully competing against established Western software service firms in the most lucrative segments of the services market for over a decade. The chapter examines the mechanisms and processes through which the Indian software services industry in general, and its major indigenous firms in particular, have developed. It finds that while substantive and contrasting forms of state intervention have played an important part in facilitating the industry’s rapid development, changes in market conditions and indirect yet fortuitous outcomes from industrial policy in other sectors also have proved crucial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although there can admittedly be some overlap. Microsoft does have a services division and Infosys—one of India’s major software service providers—has brought to market several software packages such as its best-selling banking product Finnacle. Nevertheless, revenue streams from Microsoft’s service division and Infosys’ packages are negligible vis-à-vis those generated by the firm’s core competencies.

  2. 2.

    It should be noted that the third type of service is sometimes excluded from analyses of software services due to its tenuous link to the writing of software. In this article ITES will however be included as a software service, in line with more contemporary studies.

  3. 3.

    Although the highest value-added sub-lines of IT consulting and systems integration accounted for just 4 % of total export revenues—see the statistical database of the National Association of Software and Service Companies, available at www.nasscom.in

  4. 4.

    India has never had a strong software package industry, mainly because of problems associated with software piracy.

  5. 5.

    The most famous/infamous policy ‘punishing’ the business houses was the 1969 Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act.

  6. 6.

    Plans by the Indian government to dilute (through part Indian ownership) an IBM subsidiary in India that was manufacturing printers and convert it into a computer manufacturer failed. IBM’s top management opposed the dilution plans and—as a result—was forced to close down the subsidiary and leave the country.

  7. 7.

    Such as the 1984 New Computer Policy.

References

  • Agarwal, S. 1985. Electronics in India: Past strategies and future possibilities. World Development 13(2): 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. 1989. Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialisation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. 1984. The political economy of development in India. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, C. 2004. The Indian genius: What makes Indian software programmers the best in the world. Prospect 97: 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dossani, R. 2005. The origins and growth of the software industry in India. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center Working Paper, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist. 2004. The Remote Future. London: http://www.economist.com/node/2423132. Accessed 4 Jan 2015.

  • Eichengreen, B., and P. Gupta. 2012. Export of services: Indian experience in perspective. NIPFP Working Paper, (103).

    Google Scholar 

  • Equity Master. 2010. When will TCS overtake Accenture? Mumbai: Equitymaster.com. https://www.equitymaster.com/detail.asp?date=7/7/2010&story=3&title=When-will-TCS-become-the-next-Accenture. Accessed 12 Jan 2015.

  • Evans, P. 1992. Indian informatics in the 1980s: The changing character of state involvement. World Development 20(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. 1995. Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times. 2004. Survey of the world’s most respected companies. London: Financial Times. http://www.pwc.com/extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/DocID/F3A5220CFFF41D7280256F50004104A6. Accessed 12 Jan 2015.

  • Friedman, T. 2005. The world is flat. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, J. 1984. Between dependence and autonomy: India’s experience with the international computer industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. 1996. India’s software industry: State policy, liberalisation and industrial development. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, P.S. 1980. India: A political economy of stagnation. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. 1982. MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. 2001. Leapfrogging? India’s information technology industry and the internet. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NASSCOM. 2013. India IT-BPO industry. New Delhi: NASSCOM. www.nasscom.in/indian-itbpo-industry. Accessed 24 July 2013.

  • NASSCOM. 2015. India-IT-BPM overview. New Delhi: NASSCOM. http://www.nasscom.in/indian-itbpo-industry. Accessed 12 Jan 2015.

  • OECD. 2010. The ICT sector in India: performance, growth and key challenges. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Periabras, R. 2013. Philippines: The new call center capital of the world. The Manila Times, October 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingle, V. 1999. Rethinking the developmental state: India’s industry in comparative perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porwal, S. 2009. Software companies and piracy. New Delhi: NASSCOM. Emerge. http://nasscom-emerge.groupsite.com/beta/discussion/topics/225277/messages. Accessed 12 Jan 2015.

  • Saraswati, J. 2008. The Indian IT industry and neoliberalism: The irony of a mythology. Third World Quarterly 29(1): 1139–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraswati, J. 2012. Dot.compradors: Power and policy in the development of the Indian software industry. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanium, C.R. 1992. India and the computer: A study of planned development. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 IDE-JETRO

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saraswati, J. (2016). The Development of the Indian Software Services Industry. In: Sato, Y., Sato, H. (eds) Varieties and Alternatives of Catching-up. IDE-JETRO Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59780-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59780-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59779-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59780-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics