Advertisement

Global Citizenship Education and Globalism

  • Silke Schreiber-Barsch
Chapter

Abstract

As I will argue, it is the everyday practices and performances of subjects in the midst of social inclusion that allow insights into the ideology’s powerful dimension as a tool for governing and controlling society

References

  1. Abdi, A. A., & Shultz, L. (2014). Recolonized citizenships, rhetorical postcolonialities. In V. d. O. Andreotti & L. M. T. M. d. Souza (Eds.), Postcolonial perspectives on global citizenship education (pp. 158–171). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  2. Ackermann, K. E., & Amelung, M. (2009). Gutachten zur Situation der Erwachsenenbildung von Menschen mit geistiger Behinderung in Berlin. Berlin: Lebenshilfe.Google Scholar
  3. Amin, A. (2015). Animated Space. Public Culture, 2, 239–258. doi: 10.1215/08992363-2841844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreotti, V. d. O., & Souza, L. M. T. M. (2014). Introduction Global Citizenship Education ‘Otherwise’. In V. d. O. Andreotti & L. M. T. M. d. Souza (Eds.), Postcolonial perspectives on global citizenship education (pp. 1–6). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Armstrong, P. F. (1982). The ‘Needs-Meeting’ ideology in liberal adult education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 1, 293–321. doi: 10.1080/0260137820010402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung (2014) (Eds.), Bildung in Deutschland 2014. Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
  7. Banks, L. M., & Polack, S. (2014). The economic costs of exclusion and gains of inclusion of people with disabilities: evidence from low and middle income countries. London: International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.Google Scholar
  8. Bartelheimer, P. (2007). Politik der Teilhabe. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  9. Berthoud, R. (2007). Work-rich, work-poor: Three decades of change. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  10. Biesta, G., & Lawy, R. (2006). From teaching citizenship to learning democracy: overcoming individualism in research, policy and practice. Cambridge journal of education, 1, 63–79. doi: 10.1080/03057640500490981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolder, A., & Hendrich, W. (2000). Fremde Bildungswelten. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bösl, E., Klein, A., & Waldschmidt, A. (2010) (Eds.), Disability History. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  13. Buckup, S. (2009). The price of exclusion: The economic consequences of excluding people with disabilities from the world of work. International labour office employment working paper no. 43. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_emp/—ifp_skills/documents/publication/wcms_119305.pdf. Accessed Feb 23, 2016.
  14. Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of ableism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castel, R. (1995). Les métamorphoses de la question sociale. Une chronique du salariat. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  16. Castel, R. (2005). Die Stärkung des Sozialen. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.Google Scholar
  17. Cele, S. (2013). Performing the Political through public space: Teenage girls’ everyday use of a city park. Space and Polity, 1, 74–87. doi: 10.1080/13562576.2013.780714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Devlin, R., & Pothier, D. (2006). Introduction: Toward a critical theory of dis-citizenship. In D. Pothier & R. Devlin (Eds.), Critical disability theory (pp. 1–22). Vancouver & Toronto: UBC.Google Scholar
  19. Dower, N. (2008). Are we all global citizens or are only some of us global citizens? In A. A. Abdi & L. Shultz (Eds.), Educating for Human Rights and Global Citizenship (pp. 39–53). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  20. Edwards, R., Armstrong, P., & Miller, N. (2001). Include me out: Critical readings of social exclusion, social inclusion and lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 5, 417–428. doi: 10.1080/02601370120116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton UP: Princeton.Google Scholar
  22. EUROSTAT. (2015). Lifelong learning statistics. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Lifelong_learning_statistics. Accessed March 23, 2016.
  23. Evangelische Stiftung Alsterdorf/Protestant Foundation Alsterdorf (2016). Eine Bewegte Geschichte. http://www.alsterdorf.de/ueber-uns/geschichte.html. Accessed Feb 22, 2016.
  24. Fordyce, M., & Riddell, S. (2015). Employment experiences and outcomes people in Scotland who are deaf or hard of hearing: intersections of deafness and. In C. Grover & L. Piggott (Eds.), Disabled people, work and welfare (pp. 163–180). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. (2006). Geschichte der Gouvernementalität. B. 1 & 2. Frankfurt a.M.: suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  26. Franz, D., & Beck, I. (2007). Umfeld und Sozialraumorientierung in der Behindertenhilfe. Geistige Behinderung, 4, 284–294.Google Scholar
  27. Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition. New Left Review, 212, 68–92.Google Scholar
  28. Gallie, D., & Paugam, S. (2000). Welfare regimes and the experience of unemployment in europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ginsberg, M. B., & Wlodkowski, R. J. (2010). Access and participation. In C. E. Kasworm, A. D. Rose, & J. M. Ross-Gordon (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 25–34). Los Angeles et al.: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Heimlich, U., & Behr, I. (2009). Inklusion von Menschen mit Behinderung in der Erwachsenenbildung/Weiterbildung. In R. Tippelt & A. V. Hippel (Eds.), Handbuch Erwachsenenbildung/Weiterbildung (3rd ed., pp. 813—826). Wiesbaden: VS Verl.Google Scholar
  31. Hippel, A.v., & Tippelt, R. (2009). Adressaten-, Teilnehmer- und Zielgruppenforschung. In R. Tippelt & A.V. Hippel (eds.), Handbuch Erwachsenenbildung/Weiterbildung (3rd ed., pp. 801–812). Wiesbaden: VS Verl.Google Scholar
  32. Huaman, S. H., Koenig, S., & Shultz, L. (2008). A call and response. Human rights as a tool of dignity and transformation. In In A. A. Abdi & L. Shultz (Eds.), Educating for human rights and global citizenship (pp. 11–23). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hyslop-Margison, E. J., & Sears, A. M. (2008). Challenging the Dominant neo-liberal discourse. In M. A. Peters, A. Britton, & H. Blee (Eds.), Global citizenship education: Philosophy, theory and pedagogy (pp. 299–315). Sense: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  34. Illich, I., et al. (Eds.). (1977). Disabling Professions. London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
  35. Isin, E. F., & Nyers, P. (2014). Introduction: Globalizing citizenship studies. In E. F. Isin & P. Nyers (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Global Citizenship Studies (pp. 1–11) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Kabeer, N. (2005). Introduction. The search for inclusive citizenship: Meanings and expressions in an interconnected world. In N. Kabeer (Ed.), Inclusive Citizenship. Meanings and Expressions (pp. 1–27). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  37. Koscheck, S., Weiland, M., & Ditschek, E. J. (2013). wbmonitor Umfrage 2012: Klima und Strukturen der Weiterbildungslandschaft. BiBB & DIE. www.bibb.de/dokumente/pdf/wbmonitor_Ergebnisbericht_Umfrage_2012.pdf. Accessed Feb 22, 2016.
  38. Kronauer, M. (2010). Einleitung – Oder warum Inklusion und Exklusion wichtige Themen für die Weiterbildung sind. In M. Kronauer (Ed.), Inklusion und Weiterbildung (pp. 9–23). WBV: Bielefeld.Google Scholar
  39. Lazarsfeld, P., Jahoda, M., & Zeisel, H. (1933). Marienthal: The sociology of an unemployed community. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  40. Lehr, U. (2000). Psychologie des Alterns (9th ed.). Wiebelsheim: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
  41. Lenoir, R. (1974). Les exclus. Un français sur dix. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  42. Lindmeier, C. (2003). Integrative Erwachsenenbildung. DIE Zeitschrift für Erwachsenenbildung, 4, 28–35.Google Scholar
  43. Luhmann, N. (1995). Inklusion und Exklusion. In N. Luhmann (Eds.), Soziologische Aufklärung (pp. 237–264). Opladen: Westdt. Verlag.Google Scholar
  44. Masschelein, J., & Quaghebeur, K. (2005). Participation for better or for worse? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 1, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mecheril, P. (2007). Diversity. Die Macht des Einbezugs. https://heimatkunde.boell.de/2007/01/18/diversity-die-macht-des-einbezugs Accessed May 10, 2016.
  46. Merriam, S. B. (2010). Globalization and the role of adult and continuing education: Challenges and opportunities. In C. E. Kasworm, A. D. Rose, & J. M. Ross-Gordon (Eds.), Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education (pp. 401–409). Los Angeles et al.: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Myrdal, G. (1963). Challenge to Affluence. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  48. OECD. (2013). Divided we stand: Why inequality keeps rising. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  49. Paugam, S. (Ed.). (1996). L’exclusion, l’état des savoirs. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  50. Peters, M. A., Blee, H., & Britton, A. (2008). Introduction. Many faces of global civil society: Possible futures for global citizenship. In M. A. Peters, A. Britton, & H. Blee (Eds.), Global citizenship education: philosophy, theory and pedagogy (pp. 1–13). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  51. Pfahl, L. (2011). Techniken der Behinderung. Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  53. Richardson, J. G., & Powell, J. J. W. (2011). Comparing special education. Origins to Contemporary Paradoxes. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Riddell, S., Baron, S., & Wilson, A. (2001). The learning society and people with learning difficulties. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Riddell, S., & Watson, N. (2014). Disability, culture and identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Rocco, T. S., & Delgado, A. (2011). Shifting Lenses: A Critical examination of disability in adult education. In T. S. Rocco (Ed.), Challenging ableism, understand disability, including adults with disabilities in workplaces and learning spaces. New directions for adult and continuing education, (vol. 132, pp. 3–12).Google Scholar
  57. Rule, P., & Modipa, T. R. (2012). “We must believe in ourselves”: Attitudes and experiences of adult learners with disabilities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Adult Education Quarterly, 2, 138–158. doi: 10.1177/0741713611400303.
  58. Schnapper, D. (1996). Intégration et exclusion dans les sociétés modernes. In S. Paugam (Ed.), L’exclusion, l’état des savoirs (pp. 23–41). Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  59. Schreiber-Barsch, S. (2017). Space is more than place: The urban context as contested terrain of inclusive learning settings for adults and arena of political subjectivation. In: H. Sacré & S. de Visscher (Eds.), Learning the city. Cultural approaches to civic learning in urban spaces (pp. 67–81). Cham: Springer Briefs in Education.Google Scholar
  60. Schroer, M. (2010). Die im Dunkeln sieht man doch. Inklusion, Exklusion und die Entdeckung der Überflüssigen. Mittelweg 36, Okt/Nov, pp. 33–48.Google Scholar
  61. Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited (2nd ed.). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Snyder, S. L., & Mitchell, D. T. (2006). Cultural locations of disability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sork, T. J. (2010). Planning and delivering of programs. In C. E. Kasworm, A. D. Rose, & J. M. Ross-Gordon (Eds.), Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education (pp. 157–166). Los Angeles et al.: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Stickley, T., Hitchcock, R., & Bertram, G. (2005). Social inclusion or social control? Homelessness and mental health. Mental Health Practice, 9, 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. United Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/eng.pdf. Accessed Feb, 22 2016.
  66. United Nations (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml. Accessed Feb 22, 2016.
  67. Wilson, J. (2000). Doing justice to inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 3, 297–304. doi: 10.1080/088562500750017907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wrana, D. (2006). Die Differenz Exklusion/ Inklusion in der Theorie der Erwachsenenbildung. In H. J. Forneck, G. Wiesner, & C. Zeuner (Eds.), Teilhabe an der Erwachsenenbildung und gesellschaftliche Modernisierung (pp. 83–97). Schneider: Baltmannsweiler.Google Scholar
  69. Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zeuner, C. (2009). Erwachsenenbildung: Begründungen und Dimensionen—ein Überblick aus historischer Perspektive. Enzyklopädie Erziehungswissenschaft Online. doi: 10.3262/EEO16090019.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations