Advertisement

Global Citizenship Education: A Southern African Perspective

Chapter

Abstract

If global citizenship education in southern Africa, most notably South Africa, were to be enacted commensurately with a values-based approach of democratic citizenship education, the possibility exists that deeper levels of openness, accountability and democracy would be enacted and manifested in higher education institutions. In this chapter I argue for the continued enactment of pronounced ‘values’ such as equity, tolerance, multilingualism, openness, accountability, social honour, democracy, social justice, equality, non-racism and non-sexism, Ubuntu (humanness and human interdependence), an open society, accountability, the rule of law, respect and reconciliation (DoE 2001: 3) that can engender deliberative, open and reconciliatory change in higher education. My contention is that an enactment of such ‘values’ can lead to a much desired dissonance in pedagogical encounters that could deepen the cultivation of democratic citizenship education so necessary to advance global citizenship education especially as the latter can sustain deliberative democratic communities. A defence of democratic citizenship education ‘values’, with a glocal bias, has the potential to enhance the recognition of people’s rights and responsibilities, cultivate human rights discourses in an atmosphere of democracy and openness, and exercise universal and equal moral respect to all individuals and groups. It is a values-based approach to global citizenship education that can contribute towards enlarging the students’ and teachers’ moral perspectives, as they endeavour to disrupt pedagogical encounters in a dissonant way.

References

  1. Arthur, J., Davies, I., & Hahn, C. (Eds.). (2008). The SAGE handbook of education for citizenship and democracy. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  2. Benhabib, S. (2011). Dignity in adversity: Human rights in troubled times. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Biesta, G. (2011). Learner, student, speaker: Why it matters how we call those we teach. In M. Simons & J. Masschelein (Eds.), Rancierè, public education and the taming of democracy (pp. 31–42). London: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Derrida, J. (2004). Eyes of the university: Right to philosophy 2 (J. Plug, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. DoBE (Department of Basic Education). (2008). A bill of responsibilities for the youth of South Africa. Pretoria: Government Printers.Google Scholar
  6. DoE (Department of Education). (2000). Values, education and democracy. Report of the working group on values in education. Pretoria: Government Printers.Google Scholar
  7. DoE (Department of Education). (2001). Manifesto on values, education and democracy. Cape Town: Cape Argus Teacher Fund.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1988). Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings 1977–1984. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Friedrich, D., Jaastad, B., & Popkewitz, T. S. (2011). Democratic education: An (im)possibility that yet remains to come. In M. Simons & J. Masschelein (Eds.), Rancierè, public education and the taming of democracy (pp. 60–75). London: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gutmann, A. (2003). Identity in democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gyekye, K. (1992). Tradition and modernity: Philosophical reflections on the African experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hansen, D. T. (2011). The teacher and the world: A study of cosmopolitanism as education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Kahne, J., & Middaugh, E. (2006). Patriotism and education: Is patriotism good for democracy—A study of high school seniors’ patriotic commitments. Phi Delta Kappan, April, 600–607.Google Scholar
  14. Mauch, W. (2016). Active citizenship in the context of UNESCO’s quest for global citizenship education. Unpublished Paper delivered at the Summer School of Hamburg University’s Faculty of Educational Sciences, 22 September. Hamburg: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  15. Peters, M. A., Britton, A., & Blee, H. (Eds.). (2008). Global citizenship education: Philosophy, theory and pedagogy. Rotterdam/Boston/Tapei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant school master: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation (K. Ross, Trans.) London: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement, politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ronaghi, F., Saberi, A., & Trumbore, A. (2015). NovoEd, a social learning environment. In P. Kim (Ed.), Massive open online courses: The MOOC revolution (pp. 96–105). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Waghid, Y. (2010). Education, democracy and citizenhsip revisited: Pedagogical encounters. Stellenbosch: SUN Press.Google Scholar
  20. Waghid, Y. (2014). African philosophy of education reconsidered: On being human. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Wallace Brown, G., & Held, D. (2010). The cosmopolitan reader. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Wintersteiner, W. (2016). Global citizenship education reconsidered. Unpublished Paper delivered at the Summer School of Hamburg University’s Faculty of Educational Sciences, 21 September. Hamburg University: Faculty of Educational Sciences.Google Scholar
  23. Zeleza, P. T. (2004). Neon-liberalism and academic freedom. In P. T. Zeleza & A. Olukoshi (Eds.) African universities in the twenty-first century, volume 1 – Liberalisation and internationalisation (pp. 42–68). Dakar: Codesria. Part 2 Ideologies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education Policy StudiesStellenbosch University in South AfricaMatielandSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations