Global Citizenship Education—Assessing the Unassessable?

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the role of assessment in global citizenship education (GCE). We will consider what can be assessed, and how teachers can design and manage appropriate assignment tasks in relation to normative assessment practices. The ways in which assessment might inform curriculum, behaviours, and engagement with GCE are considered in relation to institutional practices. The role of the assessor is also discussed by considering the extent to which this role aligns with the assessor’s own behaviours. Finally, the potential of a Human Capabilities Approach is briefly explored in relation to the development and support of assessors in GCE.

References

  1. Biesta, G., & Lawy, R. (2006). From teaching citizenship to learning democracy: Overcoming individualism in research, policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 63–79.Google Scholar
  2. Bloxham, S., den-Outer, B., Hudson, J., & Price, M. (2015). Let’s stop the pretence of consistent marking: Exploring the multiple limitations of assessment criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–16.Google Scholar
  3. Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education, 15(1), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35–48). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  5. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burdon, P. D., & Heath, M. (2015). Academic resistance to the neoliberal university. Legal Education Review, 23(2), 379–401.Google Scholar
  7. Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2015). Staff student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–15.Google Scholar
  8. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobewall, H. (2014). A comparison of self-other agreement in personal values versus the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Falchikov, N. (2013). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Forsyth, R., Cullen, R., Ringan, N., & Stubbs, M. (2015). Supporting the development of assessment literacy of staff through institutional process change. London Review of Education, 13, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hill, J., Walkington, H., & France, D. (2016). Graduate attributes: Implications for higher education practice and policy. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jerome, L. (2008). Assessing citizenship education. In J. Arthur, I. Davies & C. Hahn (Eds.), Sage handbook of education for citizenship and democracy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Jordan, M. E., Kleinsasser, R. C., & Roe, M. F. (2014). Wicked problems: Inescapable wickedity. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(4), 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person–situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1149–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Longhurst, J. (2014). Education for Sustainable Development: Guidance for UK Higher Education providers. Google Scholar
  17. McNaughton, S. M., & Billot, J. (2016). Negotiating academic teacher identity shifts during higher education contextual change. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), 644–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller, S., & Bird, J. (2014). Assessment of practitioners’ and students’ values when recruiting: Sam Miller and Jim Bird explain how values-based recruitment is being used to create a workforce that is suitable to provide the care required by the NHS. Nursing Management, 21(5), 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nixon, S., Brooman, S., Murphy, B., & Fearon, D. (2016). Clarity, consistency and communication: Using enhanced dialogue to create a course-based feedback strategy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–11.Google Scholar
  20. Olver, J. M., & Mooradian, T. A. (2003). Personality traits and personal values: A conceptual and empirical integration. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(1), 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2002). The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(4), 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oxley, L., & Morris, P. (2013). Global citizenship: A typology for distinguishing its multiple conceptions. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parks-Leduc, L., Feldman, G., & Bardi, A. (2014). Personality traits and personal values: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review. doi:10.1177/1088868314538548.Google Scholar
  24. Ralston, D. A., Egri, C. P., Reynaud, E., Srinivasan, N., Furrer, O., Brock, D., et al. (2011). A twenty-first century assessment of values across the global workforce. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reimers, F. M. (2013). Education for improvement: Citizenship in the global public sphere. Harvard International Review, 35, 56+.Google Scholar
  26. Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sambell, K., & McDowell, L. (1998). The construction of the hidden curriculum: Messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scott Belt, A. A. (2016). Does global citizenship education predict identification with all humanity? Bowling Green, Kentucky: West Kentucky University.Google Scholar
  30. Sen, A. (1980). Equality of what? Paper presented at The Tanner Lecture on Human Values.Google Scholar
  31. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  32. Spronken-Smith, R., Bond, C., McLean, A., Frielick, S., Smith, N., Jenkins, M., et al. (2015). Evaluating engagement with graduate outcomes across higher education institutions in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(5), 1014–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stearns, P. N. (2009). Educating global citizens in colleges and universities: Challenges and opportunities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. UNDP. (2015). United nations development programme sustainable development goals.Google Scholar
  35. UNESCO. (2014). Global citizenship education: Preparing learners for the challenges of the 21st century. Paris.Google Scholar
  36. Walker, M. (2008). A human capabilities framework for evaluating student learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(4), 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations