Intercultural Citizenship Education in the Language Classroom



This chapter describes the notion of intercultural citizenship in language education and illustrates it with a telecollaboration project in higher education between Argentina and Italy. The theory’s tenet is that a combination of language teaching and citizenship education has an educationally significant potential to contribute to the evolution of societies. With global citizenship education it shares its purpose of developing students’ knowledge, skills and attitudes (civic, social and others), through criticality and reflexivity, to instill change in the world. Findings show an identification as a community of transnational peers amongst participants, the development of intercultural citizenship skills and civic engagement.



I am grateful to the editors of this book for this opportunity to put intercultural citizenship in language education in the foreground. I am also indebted to Mike Byram for his continuous support and to Ana Virginia Miguel, Graciela Baum and Marta Guarda for their collaboration in this joint project.


  1. Abdullahi, S. (2010). Rethinking global education in the twenty-first century. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Global pedagogies: Schooling for the future, globalisation, comparative education and policy research (pp. 23–34). Springer Link: E-book.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alred, G., Byram, M., & Fleming, M. (2003). Intercultural experience and education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  3. Alred, G., Byram, M., & Fleming, M. (2006). Education for intercultural citizenship: Concepts and comparisons. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, M. J. (2009). Defining, measuring, and facilitating intercultural learning: A conceptual introduction to the intercultural education double supplement. Intercultural Education, 20(sup1), S1–S13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Budd, J. (2013). Informational education: Creating an understanding of justice. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 8, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (1997). Merely cultural. Social Text, 52(53), 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  9. Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  10. Byram, M. (2009). Intercultural competence in foreign languages. The intercultural speaker and the pedagogy of foreign language education. In D. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 321–332). California: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Byram, M. (2010). Linguistic and cultural education for Bildung and citizenship. Modern Language Journal, 94, 317–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byram, M. (2012). Conceptualizing intercultural (communicative) competence and intercultural citizenship. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 85–97). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Byram, M. (2014). Twenty-five years on—from cultural studies to intercultural citizenship. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(3), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Byram, M., Barrett, M., Ipgrave, J., Jackson, R., & Méndez García, M. C. (2009). Autobiography of intercultural encounters. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  15. Byram, M., & Feng, A. (2004). Culture and language learning: Teaching, research and scholarship. Language Teaching, 37, 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Byram, M., Golubeva, I., Han, H., & Wagner, M. (Eds.). (2017). From principles to practice in education for intercultural citizenship. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  17. Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. (2001). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  20. Council of Europe. (2010). Charter on education for democratic citizenship and human rights education. Retrieved from
  21. Dobson, A., & Bell, D. (Eds.). (2006). Environmental citizenship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Genetsch, M. (2007). The texture of identity. Toronto: TSAR Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Guilherme, M. (2002). Critical citizens for an intercultural world: Foreign language education as cultural politics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  25. Jackson, J. (2014). Global citizenship and intercultural (communicative) competence. In J. Jackson (Ed.), Introducing language and intercultural communication (pp. 297–323). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Johnston, B., Mitchell, R., Miles, F., & Ford, P. (2011). Developing student criticality in higher education. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  27. Kramsch, C. (2011). The symbolic dimensions of the intercultural. Language Teaching, 44, 354–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liddicoat, A., & Scarino, A. (2013). Intercultural language teaching and learning. West Sussex: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. López, L. E., & Sichra, I. (2008). Intercultural bilingual education among indigenous peoples in Latin America. In J. Cummins & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education. Volume 5. Bilingual education (pp. 295–309). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Lu, P., & Corbett, J. (2011). An intercultural approach to second language education and citizenship. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language andintercultural communication (pp. 325–339). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Mertens, D. (2015). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Myers, J. P. (2016). Charting a democratic course for global citizenship education: Research directions and current challenges. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(55).
  33. Myers, J. P., & Zaman, H. A. (2009). Negotiating the global and national: Immigrant and dominant culture adolescents’ vocabularies of citizenship in a transnational world. Teachers College Record, 111(11), 2589–2625.Google Scholar
  34. Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44, 412–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Dowd, R. (2015). The competences of the telecollaborative teacher. The Language Learning Journal, 43(2), 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Osler, A. (2012). Teaching for inclusive citizenship, peace and human rights. In P. Cowan and H. Maitles (Eds.), Teaching controversial issues in the classroom: Key issues and debates (pp. 71–83). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  37. Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2010). Teachers and human rights education. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.Google Scholar
  38. Oxley, L., & Morris, P. (2013). Global citizenship: A typology for distinguishing its multiple conceptions. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Porto, M. (2016). Ecological and intercultural citizenship in the primary english as a foreign language (EFL) classroom: An online project in Argentina. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(4), 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Porto, M., & Yulita, L. (2017). Language and intercultural citizenship education for a culture of peace: The Malvinas/Falklands. In M. Byram et al. (Eds.), From principles to practice in education for intercultural citizenship (pp. 199–224). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  41. Risager, K. (2011). The cultural dimensions of language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 44(4), 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scarino, A. (2009). Assessing intercultural capability in learning languages: Some issues and considerations. Language Teaching, 42, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Witteborn, S. (2010). The role of transnational NGOs in promoting global citizenship and globalizing communication practices. Language and Intercultural Communication, 10(4), 358–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yulita, L., & Porto, M. (2017). Human rights education in language teaching. In M. Byram et al. (Eds.), From principles to practice in education for intercultural citizenship (pp. 225–250). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (Institute of Research in the Social Sciences and the Humanities), Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación (School of Humanities and Sciences of Education)Universidad Nacional de La Plata and CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas)La PlataArgentina

Personalised recommendations