Skip to main content
  • 3304 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter makes the case for the continued importance of the concept of social class for understanding global citizenship. It considers different approaches to defining and measuring social class before examining how social class relates to citizenship, through a review of the ideas of TH Marshall. Marshall argued that class-based social inequalities impede full citizenship even where political and civil rights have been secured. This argument is illustrated through contemporary debates about (a) social mobility; and (b) political engagement. While some have claimed that the importance of social class for identity and political action has diminished, it is proposed that recent cultural class analyses reveal new ways in which social class can obstruct citizenship. Education figures prominently in these processes, since social class inequalities affect educational achievement, which in turn influences the full enjoyment of citizenship. The case is made for extending the examination of the relationship between social class and citizenship to the global level, taking note of the risk that global citizenship becomes a site of class-based processes of the deployment and accumulation of advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, D. P. (2011). Forward and backward, horizontal and vertical: Transformation of occupational credentialing in the schooled society. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., & Nikita, D. P. (2014). The global middle class and school choice: A cosmopolitan sociology. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaf, 17(S3), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Connected sociologies. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottero, W. (2005). Stratification: Social division and inequality. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bottomore, T. (1992). Citizenship and social class, forty years on. In T. H. Marshall & T. Bottomore (Eds.), Citizenship and social class (pp. 53–93). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R. (2010). Educational expansion and social mobility in the 20th century. Social Forces, 89(2), 365–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corak, M. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, J., & Lingard, B. (2015). Assured optimism in a Scottish girls’ school: Habitus and the (re)production of global privilege. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(1), 116–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. H., & Jackson, M. (2008). Education-based meritocracy: The barriers to its realization. In A. Laureau & D. Conley (Eds.), Social class: How does it work?. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutsen, O. (2006). Class and voting in Western Europe: A comparative longitudinal study. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurison, D. (2016). Social class and political engagement in the United States. Sociology Compass, 10(8), 684–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1992 [1950]). Citizenship and social class. In T. H. Marshall, & T. Bottomore (Eds.), (pp. 1–51). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakulski, J. (2005). Foundations of a post-class analysis. In E. O. Wright (Ed.), Approaches to class analysis (pp. 152–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M., Cunningham, N., Devine, F., Friedman, S., Laurison, D., Mckenzie, L., et al. (2015). Social class in the 21st century. London: Pelican Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, I. (2015). Revolting subjects: Social abjection and resistance in Neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weininger, E. B. (2005). Foundations of Pierre Bourdieu’s class analysis. In E. O. Wright (Ed.), Approaches to class analysis (pp. 82–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Wakeling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wakeling, P. (2018). Social Class. In: Davies, I., et al. The Palgrave Handbook of Global Citizenship and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59733-5_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59733-5_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59732-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59733-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics