Politics, Global Citizenship and Implications for Education

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines politics as a perspective and context for global citizenship education. The main argument is that the politics literature provides useful notions for conceptualizing global citizenship, and raises important issues such as global political leadership, authority, legitimacy and debates over change, but that political theory on global citizenship is constrained by the reality of a world politically structured in nation-state form, together with the predominance of Western discourses and ideologies on areas related to global citizenship. Implications for education include the need for further politics research from under-represented perspectives and the potential for imagining otherwise.

References

  1. Appadurai, A. (2006). The right to research. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(2), 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arneil, B. (2007). Global citizenship and empire. Citizenship Studies, 11(3), 301–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, D. (2014). What is liberalism? Political Theory, 42(6), 682–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others. Aliens, residents and citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter, A. (2001). The political theory of global citizenship. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cerny, P. (2013). Globalization and statehood. In M. Beeson & N. Bisley (Eds.), Issues in 21st century world politics (pp. 30–46). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Enders, J. (2010). Political science and educational research: Windows of opportunity for a neglected relationship. In A. Jakobi, K. Martens, & K. D. Wolf (Eds.), Education in political science: Discovering a neglected field (pp. 205–217). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2016). Why do citizens want the UN to decide? Cosmopolitan ideas, particularism and global authority. International Political Science Review, 37(1), 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 121–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fox, O., & Stoett, P. (2016). Citizen participation in the UN sustainable development goals consultation process: Toward global democratic governance? Global Governance, 22(4), 555–573.Google Scholar
  11. Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
  12. Guo, S. (2013). Chinese politics and government: Power, ideology, and organization. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, Paul (Ed.). (2014). Routledge handbook of global environmental politics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Hassan, R. (2006). Globalisation’s challenge to the Islamic ummah. Asian Journal of Social Science, 34(2), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heater, D. (1999). What is citizenship?. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Held, D. (2006). Reframing global governance: Apocalypse soon or reform! New Political Economy, 11(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Helms, L. (2014). Global political leadership in the twenty-first century: Problems and prospects. Contemporary Politics, 20(3), 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heywood, A. (2011). Global politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, R. (2013). Global politics in the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Jakobi, A., Martens, K., & Wolf, K. D. (2010). Introduction. In A. Jakobi, K. Martens, & K. D. Wolf (Eds.), Education in political science: Discovering a neglected field (pp. 1–20). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Kivisto, P., & Faist, T. (2007). Citizenship: Discourse, theory, and transnational prospects. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2012). Fuzzy citizenship in global society. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(4), 456–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the vernacular: Nationalism, multiculturalism and citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Linklater, A. (2007). Critical theory and world politics: Sovereignty, citizenship and humanity. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Mansbach, R., & Rafferty, K. (2008). Introduction to global politics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Marshall, K. (2014). Global development governance. In T. Weiss & R. Wilkinson (Eds.), International organization and global governance (pp. 564–579). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Mendenhall, M., & Bird, A. (2013). In search of global leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 42, 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mills, C. (2015). Decolonizing Western political philosophy. New Political Science, 37(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Minogue, K. (1995). Politics: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pegram, T. (2015). Global human rights governance and orchestration: National human rights institutions as intermediaries. European Journal of International Relations., 21(3), 595–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rai, S. (2002). Gender and the political economy of development: From nationalism to globalization. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  33. Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sassen, S. (2007). Response. European Journal of Political Thought, 6(4), 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sell, S. (2014). Who governs the globe? In T. Weiss & R. Wilkinson (Eds.), International organization and global governance (pp. 73–85). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Seubert, S. (2014). Dynamics of modern citizenship democracy and peopleness in a global era. Constellations: An International Journal of Critical & Democratic Theory, 21(4), 547–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shepherd, L. (Ed.). (2015). Gender matters in global politics: A feminist introduction to international relations (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Shilliam, R. (2011). Non-Western thought and international relations. In R. Shilliam (Ed.), International relations and non-Western thought. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Sinclair, T. (2012). Global governance. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  40. Sterling-Folker, J. (2015). All hail to the chief: Liberal IR theory in the new world order. International Studies Perspectives, 16, 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. UN News Centre. (2016). DPI/NGO: Let us work together to foster education for global citizenship. Ban tells UN conference. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=54086#.WDqk0_mLSUk.
  42. Vincent, A. (2010). The politics of human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Weiss, T. (2013). Global governance: Why? What? Whither? Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  44. Widdows, H. (2011). Global ethics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Xinhua. (2015, March 28). China unveils action plan on Belt and Road Initiative. Retrieved from http://english.gov.cn/news/top_news/2015/03/28/content_281475079055789.htm.
  46. Young, A. (2014). Western theory, global world: Western bias in international theory. Harvard International Review, 36(1), 29–31.Google Scholar
  47. Zhao, S. (Ed.). (2015). China in Africa: Strategic motives and economic interests. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Tertiary Teaching and LearningUniversity of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations