Why Cosmopolitanism Needs Rethinking
This chapter argues that hegemonic conceptions of cosmopolitanism fail to theorize a complex cosmopolitan normativity. Within such hegemonies, cosmopolitan education for global citizenship constructs future citizens as culturally mixed-up selves mobile across borders and merely respectful to, and tolerant of, the diversity that they encounter. The reader of the chapter will be presented with arguments about why this is politically too inadequate to cover the normative significance of cosmopolitanism and too uninspiring as regards citizenship education. Cosmopolitanism needs a rethinking that makes higher ethico-political demands on the global self and world for the cultivation of critical-educational ecological and relational sensibilities.
- Benhabib, S. 2006. The philosophical foundations of cosmopolitan norms. In R. Post (Ed.), Another cosmopolitanism (pp. 13–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Eikeland, O. (2016). Cosmópolis or Koinópolis? In P. Marianna (Ed.), Cosmopolitanism: Educational, philosophical and historical perspectives (pp. 21–46). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Papastephanou, M. (2012). Thinking differently about cosmopolitanism. Paradigm: Boulder.Google Scholar
- Taylor, C. (1996). Why democracy needs patriotism. In J. Cohen & M. Nussbaum (Eds.), For love of country: Debating the limits of patriotism. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
- Todd, S. (2009). Toward an imperfect education: Facing humanity, rethinking cosmopolitanism. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
- Waghid, Y. (2009). Education for responsible citizenship. Perspectives in Education, 27(1), 85–90.Google Scholar
- Waghid, Y. (2010). On the limits of cosmopolitanism and a ‘curriculum of refuge’—A response to Molly Quinn. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry 7(1), http://nitinat.library.ubc.ca/ojs/index.php/tci. Accessed February 2016.