Skip to main content

Environmental Discourse: Climate Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Language of Fear

Abstract

The focus of this chapter is on proximization strategies in today’s environmental discourse, especially the discourse of climate change. It is claimed that threat construction in climate change discourse possesses a strategic character, constituting a prerequisite for legitimization of environmental policies. The strategies of proximization involve external physical threats, such as adverse weather phenomena, as well as internal threats, such as inaction, lack of environmental awareness and bad management. The chapter includes analyses of speeches by NATO leaders and the former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Air Resources Board. (2013). Assembly bill 32: Global warming solutions act. California Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Air Resources Board. (2014). California greenhouse gas emission inventory: 2000–2012. California Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglez, P. & U. Olausson. (2010). The “climate threat” as ideology: interrelations between citizen and media discourses. Paper presented at the conference Communicating Climate Change II – Global Goes Regional, University of Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevitori, C. (2014). Values, assumptions and beliefs in British newspaper editorial coverage of climate change. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 603–625). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M. (2008). The cultural politics of climate change discourse in UK tabloids. Political Geography, 27, 549–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. & S.C. Levinson. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunmire, P. (2011). Projecting the future through political discourse: The case of the bush doctrine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krzyżanowski, M. (2009). Europe in crisis: discourses on crisis-events in the European press 1956–2006. Journalism Studies, 10, 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W. & S. Thompson. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: a theory of text organization. Text, 8, 243–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stibbe, A. (2014). An ecolinguistic approach to Critical Discourse Studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 11, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cap, P. (2017). Environmental Discourse: Climate Change. In: The Language of Fear. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59731-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59731-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59729-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59731-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics