Skip to main content

Subjectivity and Resistance Through Aesthetics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Aesthetics is still a neglected field in theoretical psychology. The marginal status of aesthetics within theoretical psychology might be based on a notion that studies in epistemology, ethics, and ontology have an immediate relevance to the discipline and profession, whereas aesthetics is assumed to be superfluous. Discussing the concept of the psychological humanities, dimensions of a theory of subjectivity are presented that include socio-subjectivity, intersubjectivity, and intra-subjectivity. Based on the idea that a purely cognitive approach to resistance is limited, opportunities for the arts in engendering resistance in these three forms of resistance in subjectivity are presented. Beyond the consumerism and the commodification of art, its cooption by power, or its legitimizing and reproducing ideology in neoliberal society, it is argued that aesthetics may be an area of life that allows for a new stream of resistance. Using classical and current examples from literature, the fine arts, and the conceptual and performing arts, possible transformations in subjectivity are elaborated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.hundertwasser-haus.info/en/

References

  • Achbar, M., Abbott, J., & Bakan, J. (Writers). (2003). The corporation. In M. Achbar & B. Simpson (Producers). Canada: Mongrel Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, B. M., & Malone, K. R. (1996). Feminism, psychology and matters of the body. Theory and Psychology, 6(4), 667–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1990). An outline of intersubjectivity: The development of recognition. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7(Suppl), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biro, M. (2013). Anselm Kiefer. London: Phaidon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. (2012). Love and justice as competences: Three essays on sociology of action. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borbely, S. (2014). Die Mittellosen: Ist der Messias schon weg? [The dispossessed: Has the Messias already left?]. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan. (Original work published 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1989). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butte, G. (2008). Suture and the narration of subjectivity in film. Poetics Today, 29, 277–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W. (2015). The happiness industry: How the government and big business sold us well-being. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delvoye, W. (2013). Wim Delvoye. See webpage http://www.wimdelvoye.be

  • Dermutz, K. (2001). Die Außenseiter-Welten des Peter Zadek [The outsider-worlds of Peter Zadek]. Salzburg: Residenz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. D., & Loomis, C. (2009). Organizational and community change. In D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, & S. Austin (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 373–390). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed., pp. 208–226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? A politcial-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, M. (1964). Andorra. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaut, B., & Mciver Lopes, D. (Eds.). (2013). The Routledge companion to aesthetics (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2015). Dangerous thinking in the age of the new authoritarianism. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., & Cole, K. R. (2014). Posthuman disability studies. Subjectivity, 7(4), 342–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie [Laying the foundations for psychology]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1982). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jüttemann, G. (2011). Historische Psychologie und die Entwicklung der Menschheit: Die Perspektive einer Fundamentaltheorie [Historical psychology and the development of humanity: The perspective of a fundamental theory]. Erwägen, Wissen, Ethik, 22(1), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1968). Kritik der Urteilskraft [Critique of judgment] (W. Weischedel, Ed.). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp. (Original work published 1790).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatani, K. (2014). The structure of world history: From modes of production to modes of exchange (M. K. Bourdaghs, Trans.). London: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, A., & Dermutz, K. (2010). Die Kunst geht knapp nicht unter: Anselm Kiefer im Gespräch mit Klaus Dermutz [Art barely drowns: Anselm Kiefer in conversation with Klaus Demutz]. Berlin, Germany: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaVallee, M. (Curator). (2014). Professional Indian Artists Inc., Group of Seven: Janvier, Ray, Morrisseau, Odjig, Sanchez, Beardy, Cobiness. Regina, SK: Mackenzie Art Gallery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, O. J. (2014). The therapeutic turn: How psychology altered Western culture. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1964). One dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1983). The portable Karl Marx (Selected, translated in part, and with an introduction by E. Kamenka). New York, NY: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. (2013). Community psychology and transformative policy change in the neo-liberal era. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52(3–4), 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, D. (2008). In the ruins of representation: Identity, individuality, subjectification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(Pt 1), 139–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (Ed.). (1984). The Foucault reader. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible (G. Rockhill, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke, J. (2012). Street-Art: Eine Subkultur zwischen Kunst und Kommerz [Street-art: A subculture between art and commerce] (2nd ed.). Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roald, T. (2015). The subject of aesthetics: A psychology of art and experience. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roald, T., & Køppe, S. (2015). Sense and subjectivity. Hidden potentials in psychological aesthetics. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 35(1), 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roald, T., & Lang, J. (Eds.). (2013). Art and identity: Essay on the aesthetic creation of mind. New York, NY: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryzik, M. (2015, August 5). The Guerrilla Girls, after 3 decades, still rattling art world cages. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/09/arts/design/the-guerrilla-girls-after-3-decades-still-rattling-art-world-cages.html?_r=0

  • Schraube, E., & Højholt, C. (Eds.). (2016). Psychology and the conduct of everyday life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraube, E., & Osterkamp, U. (Eds.). (2013). Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, H. J. (Ed.). (1998). The body and psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, J. (2015). Neoliberalism and psychological ethics. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 35(2), 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2015). Essay on an aesthetics of resistance. In J. Cresswell, A. Haye, A. Larrain, M. Morgan, & G. Sullivan (Eds.), Dialogue and debate in the making of theoretical psychology (pp. 303–310). Concord, ON: Captus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2017). From psychological science to the psychological humanities: Building a general theory of subjectivity. Review of General Psychology, 21(4), 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre, M. E., & Fine, M. (2011). A wrinkle in time: Tracing a legacy of public science through community self-surveys and participatory action research. Journal of Social Issues, 67(1), 106–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P. (1988). Die Ästhetik des Widerstands [The aesthetics of resistance]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp. (Original work published 1975 [Vol. 1], 1978 [Vol. 2], 1981 [Vol. 3]).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiwei, A. (2014). Evidence (Exhibition catalogue). Berlin, Germany: Prestel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Teo, T. (2018). Subjectivity and Resistance Through Aesthetics. In: Outline of Theoretical Psychology. Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59651-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics