Divided They Tweet? A Comparative Analysis of Twitter Networks of Pro- and Anti-EU Parties

Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology book series (PSEPS)


Our study analyses interaction networks of Europhile and Eurosceptical parties from four European countries on Twitter in order to assess their connective behaviour on social media and its conditioning factors. We examine to what degree parties’ communication networks transcend national borders stabilising transnational pro- or anti-European cleavages and to what extent the possibilities of cross-ideological exchange and interaction facilitated by social media play out in the Twitter networks of European parties and their camps. Our analyses indicate a strong separation of ideological cleavages and country clusters around parties and actors from the same country but also traces of transnational and cross-ideological interactions between the networks of Europhile and Eurosceptical parties and their strategic functions.


EU politicisation Parties Twitter Network analysis 


  1. Ackland, R., and R. Gibson. 2013. Hyperlinks and Networked Communication: A Comparative Study of Political Parties Online. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 16(3): 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamic L.A., and N. Glance. 2005. The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided they Blog. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, 36–43. New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  3. Bastos M.T., C. Puschmann, and R. Travitzki. 2013. Tweeting Across Hashtags: Overlapping Users and the Importance of Language, Topics, and Politics. Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, 164–168. Paris: ACM.Google Scholar
  4. Burris, V., E. Smith, and A. Strahm. 2000. White Supremacist Networks on the Internet. Sociological Focus 33(2): 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caiani, M., and L. Parenti. 2013. European and American Extreme Right Groups and the Internet. Farnham & Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Conover M.D., J. Ratkiewicz, M. Francisco, et al. 2011. Political Polarization on Twitter. Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 89–96. Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dahlgren, P. 2005. The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation. Political Communication 22(2): 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Vries, C.E., and E.E. Edwards. 2009. Taking Europe to Its Extremes: Extremist Parties and Public Euroscepticism. Party Politics 15(1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. eMarketer. 2016. Anteil der Nutzer von Twitter an der Bevölkerung in Westeuropa in den Jahren von 2012 bis 2018. Statista—Das Statistik-Portal.Google Scholar
  10. Emmer, M., and M. Bräuer. 2010. Online-Kommunikation politischer Akteure. In Handbuch Online-Kommunikation, ed. W. Schweiger and K. Beck, 311–338. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emmer, M., and J. Wolling. 2010. Online-Kommunikation und politische Öffentlichkeit. In Handbuch Online-Kommunikation, ed. W. Schweiger and K. Beck, 36–58. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. European Commission. 2015. Public Opinion in the European Union. Standard Eurobarometer 83, Spring 2015. Google Scholar
  13. Fuchs D., A. Roger, and R. Magni-Berton. 2009. European Cleavage, Euroscepticism and Support of the EU: A Conceptual Discussion. In Euroscepticism. Images of Europe Among Mass Publics and Political Elites, ed. Fuchs D, Magni-Berton R and Roger A, 9–32. Opladen/Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Gerstenfeld, P.B., D.R. Grant, and C.-P. Chiang. 2003. Hate Online: A Content Analysis of Extremist Internet Sites. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 3(1): 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hargittai, E., J. Gallo, and M. Kane. 2008. Cross-Ideological Discussions Among Conservative and Liberal Bloggers. Public Choice 134(1): 67–86.Google Scholar
  16. Hartleb, F. 2012. Die euroskeptische Parteienfamilie. In Parteienfamilien. Identitätsbestimmend oder nur noch Etikett? ed. U. Jun and B. Höhne, 302–325. Opladen, Berlin and Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  17. Himmelboim, I., S. McCreery, and M. Smith. 2013. Birds of a Feather Tweet Together: Integrating Network and Content Analyses to Examine Cross-Ideology Exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18: 154–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hummell, H.J., and W. Sodeur. 2010. Netzwerkanalyse. In Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse, ed. C. Wolf and H. Best, 575–606. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jun, U. 2012. Die sozialdemokratische Parteienfamilie. In Parteienfamilien. Identitätsbestimmend oder nur noch Etikett? ed. U. Jun and B. Höhne, 69–98. Opladen, Berlin & Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  20. Jürgens, P., and A. Jungherr. 2011. Wahlkampf vom Sofa aus: Twitter im Bundestagswahlkampf 2009. In Das Internet im Wahlkampf. Analysen zur Bundestagswahl 2009, ed. E.J. Schweitzer and S. Albrecht, 201–225. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  21. Koc-Michalska, K., R. Gibson, and T. Vedel. 2014a. Online Campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political Actors and Citizens in the Aftermath of the Web.2.0 Evolution. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11(2): 220–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koc-Michalska, K., D.G. Lilleker, P. Surowiec, et al. 2014b. Poland’s 2011 Online Election Campaign: New Tools, New Professionalism, New Ways to Win Votes. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11(2): 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Larsson, A.O. 2015. The EU Parliament on Twitter—Assessing the Permanent Online Practices of Parliamentarians. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12(2): 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lilleker, D.G., and N.A. Jackson. 2011. Elections 2.0: Comparing E-Campaigns in France, Germany, Great Britain and the United States. In Das Internet im Wahlkampf. Analysen zur Bundestagswahl 2009, ed. E.J. Schweitzer and S. Albrecht, 96–116. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  25. Maireder, A., S. Schlögl, F. Schütz, et al. 2014. The European Political Twittersphere: Network of Top Users Discussing the 2014 European Elections. Wien: Universität Wien, GfK.Google Scholar
  26. McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J.M. Cook. 2001. Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neuberger C, H.J. vom Hofe, and C. Nuernbergk. 2010. Twitter und Journalismus. Der Einfluss des “Social Web” auf die Nachrichten. Düsseldorf: Landesanstalt für Medien Nordrhein-Westfalen (LfM), LfM-Dokumentation, Band 38.Google Scholar
  28. Plotkowiak, T., K. Stanoevska-Slabeva, J. Ebermann, et al. 2012. Netzwerk-Journalismus. Zur veränderten Vermittlerrolle von Journalisten am Beispiel einer Case Study zu Twitter und den Unruhen in Iran. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 60(1): 102–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stöss, R. 2013. Der rechte Rand des Parteiensystems. In Handbuch Parteienforschung, ed. O. Niedermayer, 563–618. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  30. Stöss, R. 2014. Der rechte Rand bei den Europawahlen 2014. Arbeitshefte aus dem Otto-Stammer-Zentrum, Nr. 22. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, Fachbereich Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften, Otto-Stammer-Zentrum.Google Scholar
  31. Taggart, P. 1998. A Touchstone of Dissent: Euroscepticism in Contemporary Western European Party Systems. European Journal of Political Research 33(3): 363–388.Google Scholar
  32. Taggart, P., and A. Szczerbiak. 2008. Introduction: Opposing Europe? The Politics of Euroscepticism in Europe. In Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism. Vol. 1, Case Studies and Country Surveys, ed. A. Szczerbiak and P. Taggart, 1–15. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Vergeer, M. 2015. Twitter and Political Campaigning. Sociology Compass 9(9): 745–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wittwer S. 2015. Divided they tweet? Eine Twitter-Netzwerkanalyse pro- und antieuropäischer Parteien in Deutschland und Großbritannien, unpublished BA-Thesis: Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Publizistik- und KommunikationswissenschaftFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Goethe-University-FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations