Communicating Europe, Contesting Europe: An Introduction

Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology book series (PSEPS)


This volume explores attitudes of various types of political actors (citizens, political parties, social movements) towards the EU and Europe, focusing on the potential role of old and new media on them. In a context of contested legitimacy of the European democracy, the media are crucial either as an arena for political actors where to express their discontent and to contest the EU. The media represent an instrument for citizens to both get informed about European matters and, eventually, increase their interest in European politics and, possibly participation. Hence, the role of traditional mass media and the new ones in an increasingly ‘politicized’ EU can be manifold: agenda setters, catalysers (and amplifiers) of critical situations, as well as bottom-up channel for the voice of citizens (Hobolt and Tilley 2014). In this book, we shall address these issues, framing the current situation of Europe and the positions towards it in the context of ‘mediated’ politics. Therefore, this book will be guided by the following questions: How is Euroscepticism emerging in the current European turmoil? Are the (traditional and new) media, facilitators or obstacles to European democracy and the development of (pro) European citizens?


Civil Society Political Party Social Movement Citizen Participation European Parliament 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ayres, J.M. 1999. From the Streets to the Internet: The Cyber-Diffusion of Contention. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 566(1): 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruszt, L., B. Vedres, and D. Stark. 2005. Shaping the Web of Civic Participation: Civil Society Websites in Eastern Europe. Journal of Public Policy 25(1): 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ceccarini, L. 2012. Cittadini e politica online: fravecchie e nuoveforme di partecipazione. In Nuovi media e nuovapolitica? Partecipazione e mobilitazione online da MoveOn al Movimento 5 stelle, ed. L. Mosca and C. Vaccari, 89–115. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  4. Cotta, M., D. della Porta, and L. Morlino. 2004. Fondamenti di Scienza Politica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  5. Daddow, O. 2011. New Labour and the European Union: Blair and Brown’s Logic of History. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  6. de Vreese, C. 2001. Europe in the News A Cross-National Comparative Study of the News Coverage of Key EU Events. European Union Politics 2(3): 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Vries, C.E., and E.E. Edwards. 2009. Taking Europe to Its Extremes: Extremist Parties and Public Euroscepticism. Party Politics 15(1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Wilde, P. 2011. No Polity for Old Politics? A Framework for Analyzing the Politicization of European Integration. Journal of European Integration 33(5): 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. della Porta, D., and M. Caiani. 2007. Europeanization from Below? Social movements and Europe. Mobilization: An International Journal 12(1): 101–116.Google Scholar
  10. della Porta, D., and M. Caiani. 2009. Social Movements and Europeanisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Easton, D. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Emmer, M., and J. Wolling. 2010. Online Kommunikation und politische Öffentlichkeit. In Handbuch Online Kommunikation, ed. Wolfgang Schweiger and Klaus Beck, 36–58. Wiesbaden: VS VerlagfürSozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FitzGibbon, J. 2013. Citizens Against Europe: Civil Society and Eurosceptic Protest in Denmark, Ireland and the UK. Journal of Common Market Studies 51(1): 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flood, C., and S. Usherwood. 2005. Positions, Dispositions, Transitions: A Model of Group Alignment on EU Integration. Paper Presented at the 55th Annual Conference of the Political Studies Association, University of Leeds, 5–7 April.Google Scholar
  15. Franklin, M.N. 2002. Learning from the Danish Case: A Comment on Palle Svensson’s Critique of the Franklin Thesis. European Journal of Political Research 41(6): 751–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibson, R., M. Margolis, D. Resnick, and S. Ward. 2003. Election Campaigning on the WWW in the US and UK: A Comparative Analysis. Party Politics 9(1): 47–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guerra, S. 2013. Central and Eastern European Attitudes in the Face of Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guerra, S., and F. Serricchio. 2014. Identity and Economic Rationality: Explaining Attitudes Towards the EU in a Time of Crisis. In The European Union Beyond the Crisis: Evolving Governance, Contested Policies, Disenchanted Publics, ed. B. Stefanova, 269–294. Lanham: Lexington Books, Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  19. Harmsen, R. 2005 The Dutch Referendum on the Ratification of the European Constitutional Treaty, 1 June 2005, EPERN European Parties, Elections and Referendums Network, Referendum Briefing No. 13. Falmer, Brighton: Sussex European Institute, University of Sussex.
  20. Hobolt, Sara B., and James Tilley. 2014. Blaming Europe? Responsibility Without Accountability in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2009. A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hooghe, M., and W. Teepe. 2007. Party Profiles on the Web: An Analysis of the Logfiles of Non-Partisan Interactive Political Internet Sites in the 2003 and 2004 Election Campaigns in Belgium. New Media & Society 9: 965–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hooghe, M., and S. Vissers. 2009. Reaching Out or Reaching In? Information Communication & Society 12(5): 691–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karpf, D. 2012. e la nuovagenerazione di gruppi di pressione. In Nuovi media e nuovapolitica? Partecipazione e mobilitazione online da MoveOn al Movimento 5 stelle, ed. L. Mosca and C. Vaccari, 167–186. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  25. Kitschelt, H. 2006. Movement Parties. In Handbook of Party Politics, ed. R.S. Katz and W.J. Crotty, 278–288. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koc Michalska, K., D.G. Lilleker, P. Surowiec, and P. Baranowski. 2014. Poland’s 2011 Online Election Campaign: New Tools, New Professionalism, New Ways to Win Votes. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11(2): 186–205.Google Scholar
  27. Koopmans, R., and P. Statham. 2010. The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kopecký, P., and C. Mudde. 2002. The Two Sides of Euroscepticism: Party Positions on European Integration in East Central Europe. European Union Politics 3(3): 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koc-Michalska, K., R. Gibson, and T. Vedel. 2014. Online Campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political Actors and Citizens in the Aftermath of the Web. 2.0 Evolution. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 11(2): 220–244.Google Scholar
  30. Kriesi, H., et al. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Larsson, A. O. 2015. Green Light for Interaction – Party Use of Social Media During the 2014 Swedish Election Year. First Monday 20(12).Google Scholar
  32. Mair, P. 2007. Political Opposition and the European Union. Government and Opposition 42(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marthaler, S. 2005 .The French Referendum on the Ratification of the European Constitutional Treaty, 39 May 2005, EPERN European Parties, Elections and Referendums Network, Referendum Briefing No. 12. Falmer, Brighton: Sussex European Institute, University of Sussex.
  34. Meyer, C. 1999. Political Legitimacy and the Invisibility of Politics: Exploring the European Union’s Communication Deficit. Journal of Common Market Studies 37(4): 617–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Myers, D.J. 2000. The Diffusion of Collective Violence: Infectiousness, Susceptibility, and Mass Media Networks. American Journal of Sociology 106(1): 173–208.Google Scholar
  36. Michailidou, A., and H.-J. Trenz. 2015. The European Crisis and the Media: Media Autonomy, Public Perceptions and New Forms of Political Engagement. In Europe’s Prolonged Crisis: The Making or the Unmaking of a Political Union, ed. H.-J. Trenz, C. Ruzza, and V. Guiraudon, 232–250. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan/Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology.Google Scholar
  37. Mosca, L. 2007. A Double-Faced Medium? The Challenges and Opportunities of the Internet for Social Movements, EUI Working Papers MVP No. 2007/23. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
  38. Mudde C. 2011. Radical Right Parties in Europe: What, Who, Why? Participation 34(3).
  39. Mudde, C. 2016. Far-Right Parties and the 2014 European Elections: Consequences for the Eurosceptic Debate. In Routledge Handbook on Euroscepticism, ed. N. Startin and S. Usherwood. Abingdon: Routledge forthcoming.Google Scholar
  40. Patterson, T.E. 2002. The Vanishing Voter. Public Involvement in an Age of Uncertainty. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  41. Petit, C. 2004. Social Movements Networks in Internet Discourse, IROWS Working Paper, 25. Department of Sociology, University of California.
  42. Rucht, D. 2005. The Internet as a New Opportunity for Transnational Protest Groups. In Economic and Political Contention in Comparative Perspective, ed. M. Kousis and C. Tilly, 70–85. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. Russo, L., and K. Smets 2012. The Influence of Internet on Political Behaviour. What Insights Has A Decade of Research Brought Us? Introduction Paper at the XXII World Congress of Political Science of International Political Science, Madrid, 8–12 July.Google Scholar
  44. Schmitt, H., and C. van der Eijk. 2008. There Is Not Much Eurosceptic Non-Voting in European Parliament Elections. In Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism, ed. A. Szczerbiak and P. Taggart, vol. 2, 208–237. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Stanyer, J. 2008. Elected Representatives, Online Self-Presentation and the Personal Vote: Party, Personality and Webstyles in the United States and United Kingdom. Information Communication & Society 11(3): 414–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Statham, P. 2013. Media Performance and Europe’s Communication Deficit: A Study of Journalists’ Perceptions. In Mapping the European Public Sphere, ed. C. Bee, and Bozzini, 117–140. 2016, ch 7. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  47. Strandberg, K. 2009. Online Campaigning: An Opening for the Outsiders? An Analysis of Finnish Parliamentary Candidates’ Websites in the 2003 Election Campaign. New Media & Society 11: 835–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sunstein, C.R. 2001. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Szczerbiak, A. 2001. Polish Public Opinion: Explaining Declining Support for EU Membership. Journal of Common Market Studies 39(1): 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Szczerbiak, A., and P. Taggart. 2003. Theorising Party-Based Euroscepticism: Problems of Definition, Measurement and Causality, EPERN Working Paper No. 12/SEI Working Paper No. 69. Falmer, Brighton: Sussex European Institute, University of Sussex.
  51. Taggart, P. 1998. A Touchstone of Dissent: Euroscepticism in Contemporary Western European Party Systems. European Journal of Political Research 33(3): 363–388.Google Scholar
  52. ———. 2006. Questions of Europe – The Domestic Politics of the 2005 French and Dutch Referendums and Their Challenge for the Study of European Integration. Keynote Article. Journal of Common Market Studies 44(Suppl. s1): 7–25.Google Scholar
  53. Taggart, P., and A. Szczerbiak. 2002. The Party Politics of Euroscepticism in EU Member States and Candidate States, SEI Working Paper No. 51, Opposing Europe Research Network Working Paper No. 6. Falmer, Brighton: Sussex European Institute, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  54. Usherwood, S. and N. Startin. 2013. Euroscepticism as a Persistent Phenomenon. JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies 51(1):1–16.Google Scholar
  55. Warkentin, C. 2001. Reshaping World Politics. NGOs, the Internet and the Global Civil Society. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SNS, Scuola normale SuperiorePalazzo StrozziFirenzeItalia
  2. 2.School of History, Politics and International RelationsUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations