Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contours of Coalition Politics on Hydraulic Fracturing Within the United States of America

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing

Abstract

This chapter analyzes coalition politics and public policy in the USA. The data are based on an online survey of policy actors in Texas, New York, and Colorado. Two coalitions are identified based on respondents’ positions on hydraulic fracturing, problem perceptions, and interaction patterns. One coalition consists of proponents of hydraulic fracturing and they prefer to see it expanded or continued. The second coalition consists of opponents of hydraulic fracturing and they prefer to see it stopped or limited. The two coalitions have moderate differences in their resource capacities, interaction patterns, and strategies. Public policy in the three states reflects the characteristics of the two coalitions with a ban in New York and the passage of regulations in Colorado and Texas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leach. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Group in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Arthur, and Lyndon Pittinger. 2014. Resource Assessment of Potentially Producible Natural Gas Volumes from the Marcellus Shale, State of New York. Prepared for the League of Women Voters of New York State, by Labyrinth Associates, April 10. http://www.lwvny.org/advocacy/natural-resources/hydrofracking/2014/Marcellus-Resource-Assessment-NY_0414pdf.pdf.

  • Boudet, Hilary, Christopher Clarke, Dylan Bugden, Edward Maibach, Connie Roser-Renouf, and Anthony Leiserowitz. 2014. ‘Fracking’ Controversy and Communication: Using National Survey Data to Understand Public Perceptions of Hydraulic Fracturing. Energy Policy 65: 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Jeffrey J. 2014. Who’s Regulating Who? Analyzing Fracking Policy in Colorado, Wyoming, and Louisiana. Environmental Practice 16: 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, Matthew, Imogen Rattle, and James Van Alstine. 2014. Shale Gas Policy in the United Kingdom: An Argumentative Discourse Analysis. Energy Policy 73: 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Charles. 2012. The Politics of “Fracking”: Regulating Natural Gas Drilling Practices in Colorado and Texas. Review of Policy Research 29: 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Charles, and Sandra Davis. 1988. Analyzing Change in Public Lands Policymaking: From Subsystems to Advocacy Coalitions. Policy Studies Journal 17(1): 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Charles, and Jonathan M. Fisk. 2014. Energy Abundance or Environmental Worries? Analyzing Public Support from Fracking in the United States. Review of Policy Research 31: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgin, Dallas, and Christopher M. Weible. 2013. Stakeholder Analysis of Colorado Climate and Energy Issues using Policy Analytical Capacity and the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Review of Policy Research 30(1): 116–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, Brian A. 1998. The ACF and Implementation of the Endangered Species Act: A Case Study in Western Water Politics. Policy Studies Journal 26(1): 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkila, Tanya, Christopher M. Weible, and Jonathan Pierce. 2014. Exploring the Policy Narratives and Politics of Hydraulic Fracturing in New York. In The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework, ed. M. McBeth, M. Jones, and E. Shanahan, 185–206. New York: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Adam D. 2011. Ideology, Power, and the Structure of Policy Networks. Policy Studies Journal 39(3): 361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Adam, Karin Ingold, Daniel Nohrstedt, and Christopher M. Weible. 2014. Policy Change in Comparative Contexts: Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework Outside of Western Europe and North America. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 16(4): 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaspal, Rusi, and Brigitte Nerlich. 2013. Fracking in the UK Press: Threat Dynamics in an Unfolding Debate. Public Understanding of Science 23: 348–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins-Smith, Hank. 1990. Democratic Politics and Policy Analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins-Smith, Hank, Gilbert St. Clair, and Brian Woods. 1991. Explaining Change in Policy Subsystems: Analysis of Coalition Stability and Defection over Time. American Journal of Political Science 35(November): 851–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins-Smith, Hank, Daniel Nohrstedt, Christopher M. Weible, and Paul Sabatier. 2014. The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Foundations, Evolution, and Ongoing Research. In Theories of the Policy Process, 3rd ed, ed. P. Sabatier and C. Weible, 183–223. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, William D., and Paul A. Sabatier. 2005. To Trust an Adversary: Integrating Rational and Psychological Models of Collaborative Policymaking. American Political Science Review 99(4): 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, Allan. 2014. How Did the Fracking Controversy Emerge in the Period 2010–2012? Public Understanding of Science. Advanced online publication, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, Andrew S. 2004. Neopluralism: The Evolution of Political Process Theory. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Wayne. 1995. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, Barry G., and Christopher Borick. 2013. Conventional Politics for Unconventional Drilling? Lessons from Pennsylvania’s Early Move into Fracking Policy Development. Review of Policy Research 30(3): 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahm, Dianne. 2011. Regulating Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale Gas Plays: The Case of Texas. Energy Policy 39: 2974–2981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Nathan, Madeline Gottlieb, Alan Krupnick, and Hannah Wiseman. 2013. The State of Shale Gas Regulation. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul A. 1988. An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences 21: 129–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul A. 1998. The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 5(1): 98–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. New York, NY: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheberle, Denise. 2004. Federalism and Environmental Policy: Trust and the Politics of Implementation, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael F., and Denise P. Ferguson. 2013. “Fracking Democracy”: Issue Management and Locus of Policy Decision-making in the Marcellus Shale Gas Drilling Debate. Public Relations Review 39: 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodori, Gene L., A.E. Luloff, Fern K. Willits, and David B. Burnett. 2014. Hydraulic Fracturing and the Management, Disposal, and Reuse of Rrac Flowback Waters: Views from the Public in the Marcellus Shale. Energy Research and Social Science 2: 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 2007. Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2014a. Colorado State Profile and Energy Analysis. Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.gov/state/analysis.cfm?sid=CO.

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2014b. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production. Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_sum_dcu_NUS_m.htm.

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2014c. Texas Field Production of Crude Oil (Data File). Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration. http://tonto.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MCRFPTX1&f=M.

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2015. Drilling Productivity Report for Key Tight Oil and Shale Gas Regions. Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/pdf/dpr-full.pdf.

  • Wallach v. Town of Dryden. 2014. 23 N.Y. 3d 728 (New York, June 30, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, B., and Shapiro, J. 2013. Fractured, Fragmented Federalism: A Study in Fracking Regulatory Policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43(3): 474–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weible, Christopher M. 2007. An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding the Political Context of California Marine Protected Area Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17: 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weible, Christopher M., Paul A. Sabatier, and Andrew Pattison. 2010. Harnessing Expert-Based Information for Learning and the Sustainable Management of Complex Socio-Ecological Systems. Environmental Science and Policy 13: 522–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weible, Christopher M., and Tanya Heikkila. 2014. Fracking Resolution in New York – Escalation of Fracking Politics Across the Nation. The Conversation, December 22. http://theconversation.com/fracking-resolution-in-new-york-escalation-of-fracking-politics-across-the-nation-35655#comment_548955.

  • Zafonte, Matthew, and Paul A. Sabatier. 1998. Shared Beliefs and Imposed Interdependencies as Determinants of Ally Networks in Overlapping Subsystems. Journal of Theoretical Politics 10(4): 473–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafonte, Matthew, and Paul A. Sabatier. 2004. Short-Term Versus Long-Term Coalitions in the Policy Process: Automotive Pollution Control, 1963–1989. The Policy Studies Journal 32(1): 75–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Affairs, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA

    Tanya Heikkila & Christopher M. Weible

Authors
  1. Tanya Heikkila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher M. Weible
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Colorado - Denver , Denver, Colorado, USA

    Christopher M. Weible

  2. University of Colorado - Denver , Denver, Colorado, USA

    Tanya Heikkila

  3. University of Bern and Eawag, Bern / Dübendorf, Switzerland

    Karin Ingold

  4. Eawag and University of Bern, Dübendorf / Bern, Switzerland

    Manuel Fischer

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heikkila, T., Weible, C.M. (2016). Contours of Coalition Politics on Hydraulic Fracturing Within the United States of America. In: Weible, C., Heikkila, T., Ingold, K., Fischer, M. (eds) Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59574-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation