Advertisement

Probation, Privatisation and Perceptions of Risk

  • Wendy FitzgibbonEmail author
Chapter
  • 236 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter Wendy Fitzgibbon resets the current debate about privatisation of probation in the United Kingdom to show that the risk management approach rather than a ‘rehabilitation revolution’ is its dominant driving force and that a public–private combination of increasingly centralised public sector probation and the private ‘security-industrial complex’ of global security corporations has destroyed the probation service’s relationship with voluntary sector and community work within probation itself. She argues that this process has had an impact on media perception of probation and illustrates how media moral panics about high profile murders and the management of serious violent cases have legitimised a vindictive attitude to the practitioners and managers associated with these cases, imputed a culture of disproportionate practitioner culpability and undermined the social status of probation practitioners. She ends on the optimistic note that the recent high profile incompetence and alleged criminality of both corporations and operatives in the private sector may serve to redirect media focus to those aspects of deskilling of probation work which have hitherto escaped the limelight.

Keywords

Voluntary Sector Probation Officer Probation Practitioner Criminal Justice Agency Probation Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Carter, P. (2003). Managing offenders, reducing crime: A new approach. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  2. Fitzgibbon, W. (2004). Pre-emptive criminalisation: Risk control and alternative futures. London: NAPO.Google Scholar
  3. Fitzgibbon, W. (2007a). Institutional racism, pre-emptive criminalisation and risk analysis. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(2), 128–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fitzgibbon, W. (2007b). Risk analysis and the new practitioner: Myth or reality? Punishment and Society, 9(1), 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fitzgibbon, W. (2011). Probation and social work on trial: Violent offenders and child abusers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fitzgibbon, W. (2013). Riots and probation: Governing the precariat. Criminal Justice Matters, 93(1), 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fitzgibbon, W. (2016). Probation, risk and the power of the media. In F. McNeill, G. McIvor, & C. Trotter (Eds.), Beyond the risk paradigm – Rethinking practices in criminal justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Fitzgibbon, W., & Lea, J. (2014). Defending probation: Beyond privatisation and security. European Journal of Probation, 6(1), 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mulgan, R. (2003). Holding power to account. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  11. Young, J. (1999). The exclusive society: Social exclusion, crime and difference in late modernity. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CriminologyUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations