Advertisement

Probation – Rights and New Agendas

  • David DenneyEmail author
Chapter
  • 207 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter critically considers and reflects on the development of the probation services during the last three decades. Drawing on the collective work of the authors and others it shows how the politics of probation have ebbed and flowed with the dominant policies of the day. It is suggested that to demand justice from a system dominated by market competition is unrealistic and absurd.

Keywords

Criminal Justice Service User Criminal Justice System Probation Officer Institutional Racism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bottoms, A. E., & McWilliams, W. (1979). A non-treatment paradigm for probation practice. British Journal of Social Work, 9(2), 61–76.Google Scholar
  2. Broad, B., & Denney, D. (1992). Rights and the probation service: A question of empowering or oppressing probation service users. Probation Journal, 39, 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broad, B., & Denney, D. (1996). Users rights and the probation service: Some opportunities and obstacles. Howard Journal, 35(1), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooker, C., Denney, D., & Sirdifield, C. (2014). Mental disorder and probation policy and practice: A view from the UK. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37(5), 484–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bullock, K. (2011). The construction and interpretation of risk management technologies in contemporary probation practice. British Journal of Criminology, 51(1), 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrington, B., & Denney, D. (1981). Young Rastafarians and the probation service. Probation Journal, 28(4), 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavadino, M., & Dignan, J. (1992). The penal system. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Denney, D. (1983). Some dominant perspectives in the literature relating to multi-racial social work. British Journal of Social Work, 13, 140–174.Google Scholar
  9. Denney, D. (1992). Racism and antiracism in probation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Denney, D. (1997). The limits of antiracism and equal opportunities in the British Criminal Justice System. Social Policy and Administration, 30(5), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denney, D. (1998a). Social policy and social work. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Denney, D. (1998b). Learning difficulties and the criminal justice system. Probation Journal, 45(4), 194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denney, D. (2008). Risk and Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Denney, D. (Ed.). (2009). Living in dangerous times. Blackwell: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Denney, D., & O’Beirne, M. (2003). Violence to probation staff: Patterns and managerial responses. Social Policy and Administration, 37(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Department of Health. (2009). Lord Bradley’s review of people with mental health problems or learning difficulties in the criminal justice system. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  17. Duncan, G., Saunders, A., Gadsby, B., & Hazard, A. (2014). The Bradley Report five years on, London. London: Centre for Mental Health.Google Scholar
  18. Elston, M. A., Gabe, J., Denney, D., Lee, R., & O’Beirne, M. (2002). Violence against doctors: A medical (used) problem? The case of National Health Service general practitioners. Sociology of Health and Illness, 24(5), 573–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ely, P., & Denney, D. (1987). Social work in a multi-racial society. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  20. Fitzgibbon, W., & Green, R. (2006) Mentally disordered offenders challenges in using the OASys Risk Assessment Tool. British Journal of Community Justice, 4(2), 33–45Google Scholar
  21. Gabe, J., Denney, D., Lee, R., Elston, M. A., & O’Beirne, M. (2001). Researching professional discourses on violence. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 460–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilroy, P. (1990). The end of antiracism. New Community, 17(1), 71–83.Google Scholar
  23. Kemshall, H. (2002). Risk social policy and welfare. Buckinghamshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lawrence, I. (2015, June 9). Challenges and opportunities ahead for the profession, probation in England and Wales – Assessing the impact of the Transforming Rehabilitation Programme, Westminster Legal Policy Forum (conference proceedings), London.Google Scholar
  25. Macpherson, W. (1999). The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry Report. HMSO Cm 4262-I.Google Scholar
  26. Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22–54.Google Scholar
  27. Ministry of Justice. (2013a). Transforming rehabilitation a strategy for reform, Cm 8619, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  28. Ministry of Justice. (2013b). Story of the prison population 1993-2012 England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  29. Morgan, R., & Newburn, T. (2007). Youth justice. In M. McGuire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. National Offender Management Service. (2009). Promoting equality in prisons and probation. The National Offender Management Service Single Equality Scheme 2000–2009. London: National Offender Management Service Gov.UK.Google Scholar
  31. O’Beirne, M., Denney, D., & Gabe, J. (2004). Fear of violence as an indicator of risk in probation work, British Journal of Criminology 44, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reed, J. (1992). Review of health and social services for mentally disordered offenders and others requiring similar services. London: Department of Health and Home Office.Google Scholar
  33. Report of the Commission on Systemic Racism in the Ontario Criminal Justice System. (1995). System. Toronto: Queens Printer for Toronto.Google Scholar
  34. Skeem, J., Emke-Frances, P., & Louden, J., (2006). Probation, mental health, and mandated treatment: A national survey. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 33, 158–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Internet References

  1. House of Commons. (2014). Crime reduction policies: A coordinated approach? Interim report on the Government’s Transforming Rehabilitation Programme – Justice Committee www.parliament.uk. Accessed 24 August 2015.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Law, Royal HollowayUniversity of LondonEghamUK

Personalised recommendations