Advertisement

Social Justice, Human Rights and the Values of Probation

  • Rob CantonEmail author
Chapter
  • 221 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter sets out the principles that have guided the author in his career in probation practice, management, training and education. There is some initial discussion of the relationship between crime and criminal justice and a call for political recognition that criminal justice and punishment are just part (and indeed often a relatively small part) of the endeavour to reduce levels of offending, which are principally influenced by social policies. Probation can make a modest though eminently worthwhile contribution to crime reduction. When targets and outcomes come to be the way in which probation is appraised, it can be difficult – and is therefore all the more essential – to try to articulate its values. A moral perspective on probation must take into account not only what probation does, but also what it stands for, and not only its aims and achievements, but also the processes it follows and how its work is perceived by users of the service. The international discourse of human rights is argued to be a promising way in which to discuss the values of probation. The chapter concludes with some speculations about probation’s future.

Keywords

Criminal Justice Prison Population Probation Officer Critical Criminology Penal System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bean, P. (1976). Rehabilitation and deviance. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  2. Bottoms, A. (2004). Empirical research relevant to sentencing frameworks. In A. Bottoms, S. Rex, & G. Robinson (Eds.), Alternatives to imprisonment: Options for an insecure society. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. British Journal of Community Justice. (Winter 2013). Special issue on transforming rehabilitation, 11(2/3).Google Scholar
  4. Canton, R. (1987). Working at the margin, campaigning at the centre. Probation Journal, 34(3), 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canton, R. (2007a). Probation’s work with estranged families. In P. Senior (Ed.), Moments in probation. Crayford: Shaw & Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Canton, R. (2007b). Probation and the tragedy of punishment. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(3), 236–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canton, R. (2008). Counterblast: Can audits assess good practice in the enforcement of community penalties? Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(5), 529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canton, R. (2009a). Contemporary probation in Europe: Some reflections. EuroVista, 1(1), 2–9.Google Scholar
  9. Canton, R. (2009b). Taking probation abroad. European Probation Journal, 1(1), 66–78, http://www.ejprob.ro/index.pl/aindex?op=aartlist&aid=339. Accessed February 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canton, R. (2009c). Nonsense upon stilts? Human rights, the ethics of punishment and the values of probation. British Journal of Community Justice, 7(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
  11. Canton, R. (2010a). Not another medical model: Using metaphor and analogy to explore crime and criminal justice. British Journal of Community Justice, 8(1), 40–57.Google Scholar
  12. Canton, R. (2010b). European probation rules: What they are, why they matter. EuroVista, 1(2), 62–71.Google Scholar
  13. Canton, R. (2011). Probation: working with offenders. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Canton, R. (2013a). Probation and human rights. In Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 3963–3966). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Canton, R. (2013b). The point of probation: On effectiveness, human rights and the virtues of obliquity. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 13(5), 577–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canton, R., & Eadie, T. (2004). Social work with young offenders. In M. Lymbery & S. Butler (Eds.) Social work ideals and practice realities. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, C. (2000). Social work ethics: Politics, principles and practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Coates, K., & Silburn, R. (1973). Poverty: The forgotten Englishman. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Deering, J. (2011). Probation practice and the new penology. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Farrall, S. (2002). Rethinking what works with offenders: Probation, social context and desistance from crime. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  21. Garland, D. (1990). Punishment and modern society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gearty, C. (2006). Can human rights survive? The Hamlyn lectures 2005. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gies, L. (2014). Mediating human rights: Culture, media and the human rights act. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Gross, H. (1979). A theory of criminal justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hedderman, C., & Hough, M. (2004). Getting tough or being effective: What matters? In G. Mair (Ed.), What matters in probation. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  26. Hopley, K. (2002). National standards: Defining the service. In D. Ward, J. Scott, & M. Lacey (Eds.), Probation: Working for justice (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jenkins, S. (2014, April 1). There was only one loser in this Royal Mail privatisation: The taxpayer, The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/01/royal-mail-privatisation-taxpayer-loser. Accessed February 2016.
  28. Jones, O. (2014). The establishment: And how they get away with it. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  29. Knight, C. (2014). Emotional literacy in criminal justice: Professional practice with offenders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loader, I. (2005). The affects of punishment: Emotions, democracy and penal politics, Criminal Justice Matters, 60(1), 12–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. London Edinburgh Weekend Return Group. (1980). In and against the state (2nd ed.). London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  32. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view (1st ed.). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McNeill, F., & Weaver, B., (2010). Changing lives? Desistance research and offender management. Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research Report No. 3/2010 http://www.sccjr.ac.uk/publications/changing-lives-desistance-research-and-offender-management/. Accessed February 2016.
  34. Sandel, M. (2012). What money can’t buy: The moral limits of markets. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, P. (2008). Punishment and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Travis, A. (2013, March 21). Probation officers face social media gag as out sourcing row rumbles on, The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/mar/21/probation-officers-social-media-gag-outsourcing. Accessed February 2016.
  37. Whitehead, P. (2015). Reconceptualising the moral economy of criminal justice: A new perspective. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.De Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations