Skip to main content

Where Did It All Go Wrong? Probation Under New Labour and the Coalition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Probation and Politics

Abstract

This chapter will focus on how during the past 18 years the work of probation and its rehabilitative role has become increasingly politicised and its values contested and challenged and how the service itself has been the subject of unrelenting change and organisational turmoil. Two main themes will be explored. First, how the ideological commitment to economic neoliberalism and accompanying social conservatism by both New Labour and Coalition governments has shaped contemporary probation policy and undermined core traditional probation values. Second, how these developments have impacted upon the occupational culture and working practices of probation staff, and in particular on the role of recruitment and training. Finally, the chapter will seek to locate the contemporary problems facing probation within longer-standing debates around its purpose in order consider the potential tensions and contradictions in its current direction of travel and illuminate and provide a critical commentary on the present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Annison, J., Burke, L., & Senior, P. (2014). Transforming Rehabilitation: Another example of English ‘exceptionalism’ or a blueprint for the rest of Europe? European Journal of Probation, 6(1), 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauwens, A., & Burke, L. (2013). Redefining professionalism by seeking legitimacy in probation? A comparison between Belgium and England and Wales. In I. Durnescu & F. McNeill (Eds.), Understanding penal practice (pp. 109–122). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2005a). Restructuring probation to reduce re-offending: Modernisation through marketisation? Prison Service Journal, HMPS No 169, 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2005b). From probation to the national offender management service: Issues of contestability, culture and community involvement. London: NAPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2008, March). Can we build our way out of the prison crisis. Probation Journal, 55(1), 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2009, September). A collective failure? Probation Journal, 56(3), 219–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2010a). No longer social workers: Developments in probation officer training and education in England and Wales. Revista De Asistenta Socialia [Social work review], ix(3), 39–48 (Romania).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2010b, September). For better or worse. Probation Journal, 57(3): 227–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2011a, March). Revolution or evolution. Probation Journal, 58(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2011b). A runaway train. Probation Journal, 58(2), 107–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2012, September). Misunderstanding and misappreciation. Probation Journal, 59(3), 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2013a). Payment by results: Some preliminary methodological issues and research challenges from the United Kingdom. In Advancing practice, Issue 3 International Spotlight. Fairfax: George Mason University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2013b). The rise of the shadow state? Probation Journal, 60(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2013c). Grayling’s hubris. Probation Journal, 60(4), 377–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2013d). The 2013 Offender Rehabilitation Bill: ‘A curious mix?’ The British Society of Criminology Newsletter, Number 72, Summer 13. ISSN 1759–8354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. (2015). Transforming rehabilitation: The changing face of the probation service in England and Wales. In Bewährungshilfe: |Soziales, Strafrecht, Kriminalpolitik (vol. 62, 116–128). Cologne: DBH Association of Social Work, Criminal Law and Criminal Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L., & Collett, S. (2008, June). Doing with or doing to – What now for the probation service? In Criminal justice matters (Issue 72). London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L., & Collett, S. (2010). People are not things: what New Labour has done to probation. Probation Journal, 57(3) 232–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L., & Collett, S. (2015). Delivering rehabilitation: The politics, governance and control of probation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L., & McNeill, F. (2013). The devil in the detail: community sentences, probation and the market. In A. Dockley & I. Loader (Eds.), The penal landscape (pp. 109–132). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P. (2003). Managing offenders, reducing crime: A new approach. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P. (2007). Securing the future: Proposals for the efficient and sustainable use of custody in England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbon, W., & Lea, J. (2014). Defending probation: Beyond privatisation and security. European Journal of Probation, 6(1), 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. (2012). A letter from our President. British Society of Criminology Newsletter, No 27, Summer, pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (2009). Investigation into the issues arising from the serious further offence review – Dano Sonnex. London: National Offender Management Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Inspectorate of Probation. (2003). 2002/2003 Annual Report. London: HMIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Inspectorate of Probation. (2006a). An independent review of a serious further offence case – Damien Hanson & Elliot White. London: HMIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Inspectorate of Probation. (2006b). An independent review of a serious further offence case: Anthony Rice. London: HMIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Inspectorate of Probation. (2015, May). Transforming rehabilitation: Early implementation 2. ‘An independent inspection of the arrangements for offender supervision’. Manchester: HMIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2005). Restructuring probation to reduce re-offending. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, G., & Burke, L. (2012). Redemption, rehabilitation and risk management. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquand, D. (2004). The decline of the public: The hollowing-out of citizenship. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawby, R. C., & Worrall, A. (2013) Doing probation work – Identity in a criminal justice occupation. Abingdon Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, W. (1983). The mission to the English police courts 1876–1936. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 23(3), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, W. (1985). The mission transformed: Professionalism of probation between the wars. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(4), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, W. (1986). The English probation system and the diagnostic ideal. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 25(4), 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, W. (1987). Probation, pragmatism and policy. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(2), 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, M., & Burke, L. (2012). Thinking beyond utility: Some comments on probation practice and training. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 51(3), 317–330. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2010a). Breaking the cycle: effective punishment, rehabilitation and sentencing of offenders. London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2010b). Green Paper Evidence Report, ‘Breaking the cycle: effective punishment, rehabilitation and sentencing of offenders’. London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2012a). Punishment and reform: effective probation services. London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2012b). Punishment and reform: effective community sentences. London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2013a). Transforming rehabilitation: A revolution in the way we manage offenders. London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2013b). Transforming justice: Summary of responses. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2013c). Transforming justice: A strategy for reform. London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2013d). Statutory partnerships and responsibilities. London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Probation Service. (2001). A new choreography: An integrated strategy for the National Probation Service for England and Wales: Strategic framework 2001–2004. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellis, M. (2007). Humanising justice: The English probation service up to 1972. In L. Gelsthorpe & R. Morgan (Eds.), Handbook of Probation. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburn, T. (2013). This is not quite the death knell for the Probation Service but it is certainly the most radical change it has ever seen. LSE Blog. 10 January. Available at: http://blog.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/archives/29753. Accessed 21 January 2013.

  • Ploeg, G., & Sandlie, J.-E. (2011). Mapping probation futures: Norway. Probation Journal, 58(4), 386–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G., Burke, L., & Millings, M. (2016). Criminal justice identities in transition: The case of devolved probation services in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology, 56(1), 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh Bhui, H. (2004). Assessing Carter. Probation Journal, 51(2), 99–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, E. (2007). Labour’s criminal justice policies, the ten-year audit. In Criminal Justice Matters (vol. 67, no. 14). London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Independent. (2015, December 20). Privatising probation services was a foreseeable mistake – And now we all stand to pay the price. The Independent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treadwell, J. (2006). Some personal reflections on probation training. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underdown, A. (1998). Strategies for effective offender supervision. Report of the HMIP What Works Project. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lol Burke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burke, L. (2016). Where Did It All Go Wrong? Probation Under New Labour and the Coalition. In: Vanstone, M., Priestley, P. (eds) Probation and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59557-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59557-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59556-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59557-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics