Skip to main content

Probation Duty and the Remoralisation of Criminal Justice: A Further Look at Kantian Ethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Probation and Politics
  • 794 Accesses

Abstract

Increasingly since the 1980s, the moral foundations of the criminal justice system in general, and probation services in particular, have been destabilised by the politically imposed incursions of privatisation, marketization, and competition. These developments constitute the organisational logic of the neoliberal era which displaced the post-war Keynesian dispensation and its support for the personal social services. The central concern of this chapter is to re-direct attention towards the moral issue in criminal and social justice through rekindling an interest in Kantian deontological ethics and the related concept of moral economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buber, M. (1970). I and thou. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copleston, F. (1960, 2003). A history of philosophy, volume 6, the enlightenment: Voltaire to Kant. London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (2009). Trouble with strangers: A study of ethics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social disorder in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (2012). Theorizing crime and deviance: A new perspective. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1909). Report of the Departmental Committee on the Probation of Offenders Act 1907. Cmnd. 5001, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1922). Report of the Departmental Committee on the training, appointment and payment of probation officers. Cmnd. 1601, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1936). Report of the Departmental Committee on the social services in courts of summary jurisdiction. Cmnd. 5122, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1962). Report of the Departmental Committee on the probation service (Morison Committee). Cmnd. 1650, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785, 2005). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. New York: Harper Torch Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn, M. (2001). Kant: A biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, C. (1914). The probation system. London: P and S King and Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1967). A short history of ethics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, W. (1983). The mission to the English police courts 1876–1936. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, W. (1985). The mission transformed: Professionalisation of probation between the wars. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, W. (1986). The English probation system and the diagnostic ideal. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, W. (1987). Probation, pragmatism and policy. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawby, R. C., & Worrall, A. (2013). Doing probation work: Identity in a criminal justice occupation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, R. (2014). The road to Middlemarch: My life with George Eliot. London: Granta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounier, E. (1952). Personalism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellis, M. (2007). Humanising justice: The English probation service up to 1972. In L. Gelsthorpe & R. Morgan (Eds.), Handbook of probation. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkard, T. (2000). Hegel: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radzinowicz, L. (1958) Preface to the results of probation. Report of the Cambridge Department of Criminal Science. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radzinowicz, L., & Hood, R. (1990). The emergence of penal policy in Victorian and Edwardian England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynor, P., & Vanstone, M. (2002). Understanding community penalties: Probation, policy and social change. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. (1962). Kant’s ethical theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1946). A history of western philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneewind, J. B. (Ed.). (2003). Moral philosophy from Montaigne to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, A. (1929). Civilisation and ethics: The philosophy of civilisation, Part 2. Second edition, London: A. and C. Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statham, R. (ed.). (2014). The golden age of probation: Market v Mission. Sherfield-on-Loddon: Waterside Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, P. (2007). Modernising probation and criminal justice: Getting the measure of cultural change. Crayford: Shaw and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, P. (2010). Exploring modern probation: Social theory and organisational complexity. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, P. (2015). Reconceptualising the moral economy of criminal justice: A new perspective. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, P. (2016 forthcoming). Transforming probation: Social theories and the criminal justice system. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, P. (2016). Theorising religion, crime and the system of criminal justice: A moral economy perspective. In K. Sadique & P. Stanislas (Eds.), Religion, faith and crime: Theories, identities and issues. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, P., & MacMillan, J. (1985). Checks or blank cheque? Justifying custody of juveniles. Probation Journal, 32(3), 87–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, P., & Statham, R. (2006). The history of probation: Politics, power and cultural change 1876–2005. Crayford: Shaw and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, P., & Thompson, J. (2004). Knowledge and the probation service: Raising standards for trainees, assessors and practitioners. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, P. (1976). A sociological analysis of the early history of probation. British Journal of Law and Society, 3, 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. E., & Ashton, E. T. (1956). British social work in the nineteenth century. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Whitehead .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whitehead, P. (2016). Probation Duty and the Remoralisation of Criminal Justice: A Further Look at Kantian Ethics. In: Vanstone, M., Priestley, P. (eds) Probation and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59557-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59557-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59556-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59557-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics