Abstract
This chapter will focus on the international history of the probation service with a particular emphasis on the values and principles that underpinned both management and practice during most of the twentieth century, and how latterly they have been compromised by overtly political agenda. It will define those values and principles, explain why they are important, describe how they have been undermined as well as how they have survived in the undergrowth of practice, and set out the arguments for their reinstatement at the heart of a newly constituted probation service. This will not be an exercise in nostalgia for a golden age but instead it will posit values and principles in the real and current world of accountability and legitimate demands for demonstrable effectiveness. A central argument of this chapter will be that during the emergence of the Effective Practice Initiative an opportunity to incorporate the demands of accountability within the humanistic tradition of probation was lost. This chapter will pitch for that opportunity to be revisited.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biestek, F. P. (1961). The casework relationship. London: Allen and Unwin.
Clancy, A., Hudson, K., Maguire, M., Peake, R., Raynor, P., Vanstone, M. et al. (2006). Getting out and staying out. Results of the prisoner resettlement pathfinders. Researching criminal justice series. Bristol: Policy Press.
Downes, D., & Morgan, R. (1997). Dumping the “Hostages to Fortune”? The Politics of law and order in post-war Britain. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (2nd edn.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Drakeford, M., & Vanstone, M. (Eds.) (1996). Beyond offending behaviour. Aldershot: Arena.
Fabiano, E., & Porporino, F. (2002). Focus on resettlement – a change. Canada: T3.
Goff, D. (1972). An approach to community involvement. Probation Journal, 18(3), 68–72.
Hereford and Worcester Probation Service. (1989). Programme for achievement and challenge. Worcester: Hereford and Worcester Probation Service.
Hirst, G. (1996). Moving forward: How do we do that? Probation Journal, 43(2), 58–63.
Hollin, C. (1995). The meaning and implication of programme integrity. In What works: reducing offending. Chichester: Wiley.
Home Office. (1962). Report of the Departmental Committee on the work of the probation service. Cmnd. 1650. London: HMSO.
Hugman, B. (1977). Act natural. Bedford Square Press.
Jenkins, J., & Lawrence, D. (1992) ‘Black Groups Initiative Review’, unpublished paper, Inner London Probation Service.
Kynaston, D. (2014). Modernity Britain. Book Two. A shake of the dice 1959–62. London: Bloomsbury.
Le Mesurier, L. (1935). A Handbook of Probation. London: National Association of Probation Officers.
Linscott, C. J., & Crossland, R. S. (1989). Offending behaviour group programme. Devon Probation Service.
Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, Spring 5, 22–54.
McWilliams, W. (1980) ‘Management models and the bases of management structures’, unpublished paper.
McWilliams, W. (1987). Probation, pragmatism and policy. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 97–121.
Nellis, M., & Gelsthorpe, L. (2003). Human rights and probation values. In W. H. Chui & M. Nellis (Eds.), Moving probation forward. Evidence, arguments and practice. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
Pratt, J. (2002). Punishment and civilization. London: Sage.
Priestley, P., McGuire, J., Flegg, D., Hemsley, V., & Welham, D. (1978). Social skills and personal problem solving. A handbook of methods. London: Tavistock.
Raynor, P. (1978). Compulsory persuasion: A problem for correctional social work. British Journal of Social Work, 8(4), 411–424.
Raynor, P. & Vanstone, M. (1997). Straight Thinking On Probation (STOP). The Mid Glamorgan experiment. Probation Studies Unit report No. 4. Oxford: University of Oxford.
Raynor, P., & Vanstone, M. (2002). Understanding community penalties: Probation, change and social context. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Robinson, G. (2013). What counts? Community sanctions and the construction of compliance. In P. Ugwudike & P. Raynor (Eds.), What works in offender compliance. International perspectives and evidence-based practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ross, R. R., Fabiano, E. A., & Ewles, C. D. (1988). Reasoning and rehabilitation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 32, 29–35.
Rumgay, J. (1989). Talking tough: Empty threats in probation practice. Howard Journal, 28(3), 177–186.
Shaw, R., & Crook, H. (1977). Group techniques. Probation, 24(2), 61–65.
Ugwudike, P., & Raynor, P. (2013). Introduction. In P. Ugwudike & P. Raynor (Eds.), What works in offender compliance. International perspectives and evidence-based practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vanstone, M. (1985). Moving away from help?: policy and practice in probation day centres. Howard Journal, 24(1), 20–28.
Vanstone, M. (1988). Values, leadership and the future of the probation service. Probation Journal, 35(4), 131–134.
Vanstone, M. (1990). Soothsayers, training officers and a threatened service. Practice, 4(2), 121–126.
Vanstone, M. (1993). A missed opportunity re-assessed: The influence of the day training centre experiment on the criminal justice system and probation practice. British Journal of Social Work, 23(1), 213–229.
Vanstone, M. (2004). Supervising offenders in the community: A history of probation practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Vanstone, M. (2008). The international origins and initial development of probation: An early example of policy transfer. British Journal of Criminology, 48(6), 735–755.
Vanstone, M. (2010a). Maintaining programme integrity: The F. O. R.…A change programme and the resettlement of ex-prisoners. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(1), 131–140.
Vanstone, M. (2010b). Creative work: An historical perspectives. In J. Brayford, F. Cowie, & J. Deering. (Eds.), What else works? Cullompton: Willan.
Vanstone, M., & Seymour, B. (1986). Probation service objectives and the neglected ingredients. Probation Journal, 33(2), 43–48.
Ward, K. (1979). Fuel debts and the probation service. Probation Journal, 26(4), 110–114.
Weaver, C., & Fox, C. (1984). Berkeley sex offenders group: A seven year evaluation. Probation Journal, 31(1), 43–46.
Wilkins, L. T. (1958). A small comparative study of the results of probation. British Journal of Delinquency, VIII, 3, 201–207.
Williams, B. (1995). Probation values. Birmingham Ventura Press.
Wootton, B. (1959). Social science and social pathology. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vanstone, M. (2016). A Future for Evidence-Based Do-Gooding?. In: Vanstone, M., Priestley, P. (eds) Probation and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59557-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59557-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59556-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59557-7
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)