• Michael Goron
Part of the Palgrave Studies in British Musical Theatre book series (PSBMT)


In the Introduction Goron establishes the scope of his study, which will transport the reader on a journey from the world of late-Victorian manners and mores into the Savoy Theatre, and onto its stage. Goron explains the originality of his intention—an attempt to focus the methods of recent historical studies of Victorian theatre on the Gilbert and Sullivan collaboration. The Introduction explains the key concepts behind this study, particularly how notions of class and ideology can be used to analyse the workings of a theatrical organisation, the D’Oyly Carte Opera Company, as well as its key cultural product, the Gilbert and Sullivan operas.


Middle Class Cultural Production Respectable Caper Calculated Alteration Victorian Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bradley, I. (2001). The complete annotated Savoy Operas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barrington, R. (1908). Rutland Barrington, by himself. London: Grant Richards.Google Scholar
  3. Bond, J. (1930). The life and reminiscences of Jessie Bond the Old Savoyard. London: John Lane the Bodley Head.Google Scholar
  4. Cellier, F., & Bridgeman, C. (1914). Gilbert, Sullivan and D’Oyly Carte. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  5. Grossmith, G. (1888). A society clown: Reminiscences. Bristol: J.W. Arrowsmith.Google Scholar
  6. Bailey, P. (1998). Popular culture and performance in the Victorian City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Borsay, P. (2006). A history of leisure. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Boyd, K., & Macwilliam, R. (2007). Rethinking the Victorians. In K. Boyd & R. McWilliam (Eds.), The Victorian studies reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bradley, I. (2005). Oh Joy! Oh Rapture! The enduring phenomenon of Gilbert and Sullivan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bratton, J. (2003). New readings in theatre history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Briggs, A. (1988). Victorian values. In: Search of Victorian values. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burke, P. (1992). History and social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cannadine, D. (1998). Class in Britain. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Crowther, A. (2000). Contradiction contradicted—The plays of W.S. Gilbert. London: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
  15. Davidoff, L., & Hall, C. (2002). Family fortunes: Men and women of the English middle class, 1780–1850. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, T. C., 1991. Actresses as Working Women - Their Social Identity in Victorian Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, T. (2000). The economics of the British Stage 1800–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, J., & Emeljanow, V. (2001). Reflecting the audience: London theatregoing, 1840–1880. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dillard, P. (1991). ‘How quaint the ways of paradox’—An annotated Gilbert and Sullivan bibliography. Metuchen: The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dollimore, J., & Sinfield, A. (1985). Political Shakespeare: New essays in cultural materialism (1st ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gunn, S. (1999). The public sphere, modernity and consumption: New perspectives on the history of the English middle class. In A. Kidd & D. Nicholls (Eds.), Gender, civic culture and consumerism: Middle class identity in Britain (pp. 1800–1940). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hayter, C. (1987). Gilbert and Sullivan. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hewitt, M. (2008). Class and the classes. In C. Williams (Ed.), A companion to nineteenth-century Britain. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Hibbert, C. (1976). Gilbert and Sullivan and their Victorian World. New York: American Heritage Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Joyce, P. (1994). Democratic subjects: The self and the social in nineteenth-century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kidd, A., & Nicholls, D. (1999). History, culture and the middle classes. In: Gender, Civic Culture and Consumerism: Middle Class Identity in Britain 1800 – 1940. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Knowles, R. (2004). Reading the material theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lee, J. (2010). The Japan of pure invention. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mason, M., 1994. The Making of Victorian Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. McConachie, B., 2007. Historicizing the Relations of Theatrical Production. In: Critical Theory and Performance. Michigan: University of Michigan Press., pp. 284–94.Google Scholar
  31. Oost, R. B. (2009). Gilbert and Sullivan: Class and the Savoy Tradition, 1875–1896. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  32. Perkin, H. (1969). The origins of modern English society 1780–1880. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perkin, H. (1989). The rise of professional society: England since 1880. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rappaport, E. (2000). Shopping for pleasure: Women in the making of London’s West End. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rollins, C., & Witts, R. (1962). The D’Oyly Carte Opera company in Gilbert and Sullivan Operas. A record of productions 1875 – 1961. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, F. M. L. (1988). The rise of respectable society. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  37. Tosh, J. (1999). A man’s place. Masculinity and the middle-class home in late Victorian England. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wahrman, D. (1995). Imagining the middle class: The political representation of class in Britain, c. 1770 – 1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Webb, J., Schirato, T., & Danaher, G. (2002). Understanding Bourdieu. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Williams, R. (1980). Base and superstructure in Marxist cultural theory. In R. Williams (Ed.), Problems in materialism and culture. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  41. Williams, C. (2011). Gilbert and Sullivan: Gender, genre, parody. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wilson, F. (1989). An introduction to the Gilbert and Sullivan Operas. New York: Pierpoint Morgan Library.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Goron
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Southampton Solent UniversitySouthamptonUK
  2. 2.University of WinchesterWinchesterUK

Personalised recommendations