Skip to main content

Cross-Border Higher Education: A New Business?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cross-Border Higher Education and Quality Assurance

Part of the book series: Issues in Higher Education ((IHIGHER))

Abstract

This initial chapter provides an introduction to the book. It starts with a digression on the meanings of internationalisation and how it has changed since the Middle Ages, defines Cross-Border Higher Education (CBHE) and presents a possible typology. The quality-related problems that may result from CBHE are presented, as well as developments to protect consumers, including the UNESCO/OECD guidelines for Quality Provision of CBHE. This is followed by a presentation of the attempts for liberalising the provision of CBHE, including those in the framework of the GATS agreements and the European Services Directive. At last the problems created by the development of MOOCs are considered. It concludes by presenting questions to be analysed in the book to better understand the problems CBHE may create.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Education International represents organisations of teachers and other education employees across the globe.

  2. 2.

    IAU, founded in 1950, is the UNESCO-based worldwide association of higher education institutions.

  3. 3.

    ETUCE is the European Trade Union Committee for Education.

References

  • Agnelli, G. (1988). Industry’s expectations of the university. CRE-Action, 83, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., & Neave, G. (2009). On Bologna, weasels and creeping competence. In A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, & P. Maassen (Eds.), European integration and governance of higher education and research (pp. 371–388). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Archive.today. (2014). http://archive.today/U8u7#selection-195.226-195.525. Accessed 28 Sept 2014.

  • Bache, I. (2008). Europeanization and multilevel governance—Cohesion policy in the EU and Britain. London: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, S. (2007). Trends in international trade in higher education: Implications and options for developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baty, P. (2000, August 11). Minister says UK tarred by Derby affair. Times Higher Education Supplement.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Council. (2012). The shape of things to come. The evolution of transnational education: Data, definitions opportunities and impacts analysis. London: British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, K. (2000). Intervention at session 4 of transnational education symposium: Who benefits? Who pays?. The University of Melbourne, 24 November 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, M. (2000, December 15). I’d like one doner kebab and a PhD to take away. Times Higher Education Supplement, pp. 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, J., & Kanwar, A. (2005). Who’s afraid of cross border higher education? A developing world perspective. Paper presented at INQAAHE Conference, Wellington, 1 April 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D., Olson, A., & Bohm, A. (2000). Transnational education: Providers, partners and policy. Canberra: IDP Education Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehousse, R. (2005). The Lisbon strategy: The costs of non-delegation. Paper presented at the workshop on “Delegation and Multi-level Governance”, Science Po, Paris, 11 May 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESIB. (2002). Transnational education. ESIB policy paper passed at Board Meeting in Turku, October 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • ETUCE. (2006). ETUCE statement on the European Commission’s amended proposal for a Services Directive of 4 April 2006. Brussels: ETUCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2009). Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Report on progress in quality assurance in higher education. Brussels: European Commission, COM(2009) 487 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2014). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Report on progress in quality assurance in higher education. Brussels: European Commission, COM(2014) 29 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2006). Directive on services in the internal market. Official Journal of the European Union, L 376, pp. 36–68, 27 December 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagforbundet. (2008). The EU Services Directive and the Public Services: A Norwegian perspective. Oslo: Fagforbundet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, L. (2014). Coursera: Fifty ways to fix the software (with apologies to Paul Simon). In S. D. Krause & C. Lowe (Eds.), Invasion of the MOOCs: The promise and perils of massive open online courses (pp. 56–67). Anderson: Parlor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, G. (2009). Australia’s Predatory Education, http://www.countercurrents.org/hassan101109.htm. Accessed 27 May 2016.

  • Hill, M. (2014). State authorization reciprocity agreements: Overview and update. Presentation at the CHEA Summer Workshop, Washington, DC, 24–25 June, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, R. R. (2007). Building capacity in quality assurance. The challenge of context. In S. Vincent-Lancrin (Ed.), Cross-border tertiary education. A way towards capacity development (pp. 109–155). Paris: OECD/World Bank.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • IEAA, International Education Association of Australia. (2008). Good practice in offshore delivery. A guide for Australian providers. https://aei.gov.au/About-AEI/Offshore-Support/Documents/TNE%20Good%20Practice%20Guide%20FINAL.PDF. Accessed 29 Oct 2014.

  • International Association of Universities. (2003). Internationalization of higher education practices and priorities: 2003 IAU survey report. Paris: IAU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey, J. (1999). Global Economic Policy-Making: A New Constitutionalism? Otago Law Review, 9(3), 535–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (2002). Emerging indicators of success and failure in borderless higher education. London: The Observatory of Borderless Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, S. D. (2014). After the invasion: What’s next for MOOCs? In S. D. Krause & C. Lowe (Eds.), Invasion of the MOOCs. The promise and perils of massive open online courses (pp. 223–228). Anderson: Parlor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LERU, League of European Research Universities. (2014). Online learning at research-intensive universities. Leuven: LERU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2002). Learning models in different cultures. In J. Bempechat & J.G. Elliot (Eds.), Learning in Culture and Context: Approaching the Complexities of Achievement Motivation in Student Learning (pp. 45–64). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieven, M., & Martin, G. (2006). Higher education in a global market: The case of British Overseas Provision in Israel. Higher Education, 52(1), 41–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, C. (2014). Introduction: Building on the tradition of CCK08. In S. D. Krause & C. Lowe (Eds.), Invasion of the MOOCs: The promise and perils of massive open online courses (pp. ix–xiv). Anderson: Parlor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2000). Weaving the threads. Concluding remarks. Paper presented at Transnational Education symposium—Who benefits? who pays? The University of Melbourne, 24 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. (2004a). Assuring quality in the higher education global market. Paper presented at the 6th international conference in education, ATINER, Athens, May 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. (2004b). Higher education in the global market. In A. Lazaridou (Ed.), Contemporary issues in education policy and administration. Atiner: Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G., & Peim, N. (2011). Cross-border higher education, who profits? Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 9(1), 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, P. (2006). Transnational higher education: A South African perspective. Internationalization and Transnational Developments, 43 (on-line).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, P. (1996). Relações com as autoridades. In H. Ridder-Symoens (Ed.), As Universidades na Idade Média (pp. 75–106). Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1995). The stirring of the prince and the silence of the lambs: The changing assumptions beneath higher education policy, reform and society. In D. Dill & B. Sporn (Eds.), Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: Through a glass darkly (pp. 54–71). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Policy brief: Cross-border higher education and development. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, K. (2014). The evolving role of “teacher” in a MOOCs and badges world. The EvoLLLution, illuminating the lifelong learning movement. Retrieved September 29, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, W., & Franke, R. (2014). A not so distant mirror for MOOCs: College courses for credit on major American television networks in the 1950s and 1960. Paper presented at the CHER annual conference, 8–10 September, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • QAA. (2000). Report of the enquiry into allegations by NATFHE concerning aspects of the management of University of Derby degree programmes delivered through INTER College, Israel. Gloucester: QAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Y. (2002). Emerging indicators of success and failure in borderless higher education. London: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saner, R., & Faser, S. (2003). Negotiating trade in educational services within the WTO/GATS context. Aussenwirtschaft, 59(2), 275–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F., Leuffen, D., & Rittberger, B. (2011). Ever looser Union? Towards a theory of differentiated integration in the EU. Paper presented at the EUSA Conference, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheeney, B. (2010). Regulation by markets and the Bradley review of Australian higher education. Australian Universities Review, 52(1), 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sursock, A. (2001). Towards accreditation schemes for higher education in Europe. Final report of CRE project co-funded by the SOCRATES programme. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTAFRREGTOPTEIA/Resources/Towards_Accreditation_for_European_Higher_Education.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014.

  • The Chronicle of Higher Education (2009). Edition 3 August 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Times Higher Education. (2005). Edition January 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilak, J. (2011). Trade in higher education: The role of the general agreement on trade in services. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO/OECD. (2005). Guidelines for Quality Provision of Cross-border Higher Education. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wende, M. (2001). Internationalisation policies: About new trends and contrasting paradigms. Higher Education Policy, 14(3), 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2006). What is Changin in Academic Research? Trends and Futures Scenarios, The European Jornal of Education, 41(2), 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S. (2014, August 28). The professor-less university. The Times Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weelahand, W. (2012). The race to bottom in the VET market & why TAFE cannot win: IPART review—Pricing VET under smart and skilled, LH Martin Institute for Tertiary Education Leadership and Management, and the Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne. http://www.academia.edu/3451629/The_race_to_the_bottom_in_the_VET_market_and_why_TAFE_cannot_win_House_of_Representatives_Standing_Committee_on_Education_and_Employment_Inquiry_into_TAFE. Accessed 30 Sept 2014.

  • WTO. (1995). General agreement on trade in services, Annex 1B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziguras, C. (2003). The impact of the GATS on transnational tertiary education: Comparing experiences of New Zealand, Australia, Singapore and Malaysia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 30(3), 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amaral, A. (2016). Cross-Border Higher Education: A New Business?. In: Rosa, M., Sarrico, C., Tavares, O., Amaral, A. (eds) Cross-Border Higher Education and Quality Assurance. Issues in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59472-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59472-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59471-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59472-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics