Advertisement

The Ideas of the Chicago School and the Structural Contradictions of Neoliberalism

  • Alessandro BonannoEmail author
Chapter
  • 334 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter continues the review of the basic tenets of neoliberalism through an analysis of salient ideas of two key members of the Chicago School of Economics: Milton Friedman and Gary Becker. It is stressed that Friedman provided a rationale for the desirability of supply-side economics and a justification of the notion of socio-economic inequality. Becker’s notions of “homo economicus” and “human capital” provided the tools to legitimize individual competition, individuality, and individual responsibility as they were presented as indispensable for the good functioning of the economy and society. The chapter concludes by stressing the contradictions embedded in the neoliberal notions of competition, inequality, and uncertainty.

References

  1. Aegon. 2015. Aegon Retirement Readiness Survey 2015. Online document. http://www.aegon.com/en/Home/Research/Aegon-Retirement-Readiness-Survey-2015/. Accessed 20 May 2016.
  2. Atkinson, Anthony. 2015. Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, Gary S. 1990 [1976]. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, Gary S. 1993 [1964]. Human Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, Gary, François Ewald, and Bernard Harcourt. 2012. Becker on Ewald on Foucault on Becker. American Neoliberalism and Michel Foucault’s 1979 Birth of Biopolitics Lectures. Working Paper 614. Chicago: Institute for Law and Economics.Google Scholar
  6. Block, Fred, and Margaret S. Somers. 2014. The Power of Market Fundamentalism. Karl Polanyi’s Critique. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos. Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  8. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. 2009. The National Retirement Risk Index: After the Crash. Issue Brief #9–22, October.Google Scholar
  9. Choe, Stan. 2016. CEO Pay in 2015: When a $468, 449 Raise is Standard. Houston Chronicle, May 26, 2015: B1–B10.Google Scholar
  10. Crouch, Colin. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Crouch, Colin. 2013. Making Capitalism Fit for Society. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dardot, Pierre, and Christian Laval. 2013. The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Davies, William. 2014. The Limits of Neoliberalism. Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, Kinsley, and Wilbert Moore. 1945. Some Principles of Stratification. American Sociological Review 24: 757–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeProspo, Richard L. 2015. Up in Smoke. How the Retirement Crisis Shattered the American Dream. Book Baby: New York.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, Michel. 2004. The Birth of Biopolitics. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  17. Friedman, Milton. 1982 [1962]. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Friedman, Milton, and Anna Jacobson Schwartz. 1971 [1963]. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Galbrigth, James. 2016. Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Harvey, David. 2014. Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hayek, F.A. 1980 [1948]. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Holland, Kelley. 2015. Retirement Crisis: The Great 401(k) Experiment Has Failed for Many Americans. NBC News, May 23. Online document. http://www.nbcnews.com/business/retirement/great-401-k-experiment-has-failed-many-americans-n327321. Accessed 20 May 2016.
  24. HSBC. 2016. The Future of Retirement. Online document. http://www.hsbc.com/news-and-insight/media-resources/media-releases/future-of-retirement. Accessed 19 July 2016.
  25. Keynes, John Maynard. 2009 [1936]. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Classic Books America.Google Scholar
  26. Kotz, David. 2015. The Rise and Fall of Neoliberal Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krugman, Paul. 2013. End this Depression Now. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Krugman, Paul. 2016. A Robber Baron Recession is in Our Midst. The Houston Chronicle. Tuesday April 16: A15.Google Scholar
  29. Lapavitsas, Costas. 2013. Profiting Without Producing. How Finance Exploits US All. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Leicht, Kevin. 2016. Getting Serious About Inequality. The Sociological Quarterly 57 (2): 211–231.Google Scholar
  31. Macnicol, John. 2015. Neoliberalizing Old Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milanovic, Branko. 2016. Global Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MSN. 2016. The Scary Reason So Many People Are Working Beyond 65. Online document. http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/retirement/the-scary-reason-so-many-people-are-working-beyond-65/ar-BBt4BEA?li=BBnb7Kz#page=4. Accessed 20 May 2016.
  34. Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century, trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
  35. Reich, Robert. 1991. The Work of Nations. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  36. Saez, Emanuel, and Gabriel Zucman. 2016. Wealth Inequality in the United State Since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2): 519–578.Google Scholar
  37. Schram, Sanford. 2015. The Return of Ordinary Capitalism. Neoliberalism, Precarity, Occupy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Simonelli, Andrew. 2016. Trouble Ahead! Baby Boomers’ Retirement Outlook on the Decline. Insured Retired Institute. Online document. http://irionline.org/newsroom/newsroom-detail-view/trouble-ahead!-baby-boomers-retirement-outlook-on-the-decline. Accessed 22 May 2016.
  39. Skidmore-Sell, Sarah. 2016. Saving to Retire Has a Big Divide. Houston Chronicle, May 25, 2015: B1–B2.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, Adam. 2009 [1776]. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Blacksburg, VA: Thrifty Books.Google Scholar
  41. Stedman Jones, Daniel. 2012. Masters of the Universe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Stiglitz, Joseph. 2013. The Price of Inequality. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  43. Stiglitz, Joseph. 2016. The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and What We Can do About Them. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  44. Taylor-Gooby, Peter and Jens Zinn. 2006. Current Directions in Risk Research: New Developments in Psychology and Sociology. Risk Analysis 26 (2): 397-411.Google Scholar
  45. US New. 2012. Poverty Increasing Among Retirees. Online document. http://money.usnews.com/money/retirement/articles/2012/05/21/poverty-increasing-among-retirees. Accessed 13 May 2016.
  46. Watkins, Don, and Yaron Brook. 2016. Equal in Unfair: America’s Misguided Fight Against Income Inequality. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologySam Houston State UniversityHuntsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations