Skip to main content

Entrepreneurial Learning Processes for Technology-Driven Entrepreneurship: Assumptions and Behavioural Dynamics for an Integrative Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 898 Accesses

Abstract

In today’s business landscape it is widely acknowledged that the long-term viability of any firm operating in dynamic and complex environments will ultimately be determined by its ability to le’n and innovate successfully (D’Aveni 1994; Hoopes et al. 2003). A virtuous cycle of creativity, research and development (R&D), knowledge generation, application and innovation has accentuated the rate of competition and change. Knowledge, competences and learning have emerged as the key drivers of competitive advantage, making organisations rethink the way they generate value and remain competitive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albanese, R., & Van Fleet, D. D. (1985). Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 244–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammons, R. B. (1956). Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical formulation. The Journal of General Psychology, 54(2), 279–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashkanasy, N. M., & Daus, C. S. (2005). Rumors of the death of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior are vastly exaggerated. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 441–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. E. (1986). Learning styles of successful entrepreneurs. In R. Ronstadt, J. Hornaday, J. R. Peterson, & K. Vesper (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 199–210). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsade, S. G., Brief, A. P., & Spataro, S. E. (2003). The affective revolution in organizational behavior: The emergence of a paradigm. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 3–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, W. M., & Burke, W. W. (1989). Modeling organizational meaning systems. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 3, pp. 117–159). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, C. B., & Davis, J. P. (2012). Learning sequences: Their existence, effect, and evolution. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 611–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, G. W., & Kim, Y.-G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, Á., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Guido, G. (2001). Brand personality: How to make the metaphor fit? Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(3), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Braunerhjelm, P. (2009). Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: A historical review. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1193–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaneta, I. (2010). Organizational behaviour. Journal of Comprehensive Research, 49, 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual dynamics of innovation-use behavior in organizations. Human Performance, 17(4), 397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, O., & Moore, D. G. (1970). The organization makers: A behavioral study of independent entrepreneurs. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, J. (2005). Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 373–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, J., & Watts, G. (2000). Learning by doing: An exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 6(3), 104–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. C. (2005). Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994). Better than rational: Evolutionary psychology and the invisible hand. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 327–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakins, D., & Freel, M. (1998). Entrepreneurial learning and the growth process in SMEs. The Learning Organization, 5(3), 144–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, 47(1), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G. G., Ireland, R. D., Zahra, S. A., Floyd, S. W., Janney, J. J., & Lane, P. J. (2003). Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 351–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorenbosch, L., Van Engen, M. L., & Verhagen, M. (2005). On-the-job innovation: The impact of job design and human resource management through production ownership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuBrin, A. J. (2004). Applying psychology: Individual & organizational effectiveness (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson, G. (1998). The nature of economic change and management in the knowledge-based information economy. Working Paper, Department of Industrial Economics and Management, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, May 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdélyi, P. (2010). The matter of entrepreneurial learning: A literature review. Paper presented at the International Conference on Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities (OLKC) 2010, June 3–6, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/15080/1/241_Erd%C3%A9lyi_Final%20Paper_313_The%20Matter%20of%20Entrepreneurial%20Learning.pdf

  • Evans, M. G. (1986). Organizational behavior: The central role of motivation. Journal of Management, 12(2), 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. I. (2007). Entrepreneurship and enterprise skills: A missing element of planning education? Planning Practice & Research, 22(4), 635–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemmell, R. M., Boland, R. J., & Kolb, D. A. (2012). The socio-cognitive dynamics of entrepreneurial ideation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 1053–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1999). The individualized corporation: A fundamentally new approach to management. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A. A. (1987). Enterprise culture: Its meaning and implications for education and training. Journal of European Industrial Training, 11(2), 2–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A. A. (2001). Creating conducive environments for learning and entrepreneurship. In Address to the Conference of the Entrepreneurship Forum, Naples, June 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick, E. (2003). Cognitive theory and moral behavior: The contribution of F. A. Hayek to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1/2), 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. L. (1970). A theory of human action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin, Q. W. (1970). A functional approach to attitude change. Management Review, 59(8), 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R. A., & Salas, E. (1995). Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. T., & Leitch, C. M. (2005). Entrepreneurial learning: Researching the interface between learning and the entrepreneurial context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1952). The sensory order: An inquiry into the foundations of theoretical psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1978). New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1979). Law, legislation, and liberty (Vol. 3). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, M., & Lichtenstein, S. (2010). Exploring the ‘jingle fallacy’: A study of personality and values. Journal of General Management, 36(1), 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, T. R., Ireland, R. D., Holmes Jr., R. M., & Hitt, M. A. (2009). Architecture of entrepreneurial learning: Exploring the links among heuristics, knowledge, and action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmqvist, M. (2003). A dynamic model of intra- and interorganizational learning. Organization Studies, 24(1), 95–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honig, B. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: Toward a model of contingency-based business planning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(3), 258–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L., & Walker, G. (2003). Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 889–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The big five revisited. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 869–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B., Landström, H., & Rosenberg, J. (1998). University training for entrepreneurship: An action frame of reference. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23(4), 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, H. R. (1976). A new conceptualization of source of organizational climate. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79–94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, T., & McMullan, W. E. (2013). Finding practical knowledge in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 983–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1987). Evaluation. In R. L. Craig (Ed.), The ASTD training and development handbook: A guide to human resource development (pp. 294–312). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Perception, opportunity, and profit: Studies in the theory of entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., & Koestner, J. (1987). Praise, involvement, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2), 383–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Schmidt, J., & Schmidt, L. (2006). Collective efficacy beliefs in student work teams: Relation to self-efficacy, cohesion, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(1), 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 352–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. (1996). Learning and Schumpeterian dynamics. In G. Dosi & F. Malerba (Eds.), Organization and strategy in the evolution of the enterprise (pp. 27–41). Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, C. K., & Dunn, P. (2008). Are entrepreneurs optimistic, realistic, both or fuzzy? Relationship between entrepreneurial traits and entrepreneurial learning. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(1), 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1967). The human organization: Its management and value. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorrain, J., & Dussault, L. (1988). Relation between psychological characteristics, administrative behaviors and success of founder entrepreneurs at the start-up stage. In B. Kirchhoff, W. H. Long, W. E. McMullan, K. H. Vesper, & W. E. Wetzel Jr. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 150–164). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacPherson, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial learning: Secret ingredients for business success. Training and Development, 63(7), 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (Ed.) (2010). Knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship and innovation systems: Evidence from Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C., & Sims Jr., H. P. (1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning theory perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 5(3), 361–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. M. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minniti, M., & Bygrave, W. (2001). A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mone, M. A., & Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of task complexity and goal specificity on change in strategy and performance over time. Human Performance, 8(4), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan Jr., B. B., Salas, E., & Glickman, A. S. (1993). An analysis of team evolution and maturation. The Journal of General Psychology, 102(3), 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motowildo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olver, J. M., & Mooradian, T. A. (2003). Personality traits and personal values: A conceptual and empirical integration. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(1), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 366–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politis, D. (2005). The process of entrepreneurial learning: Conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porras, J. I., & Robertson, P. J. (1992). Organizational development: Theory, practice, and research. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 719–822). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. (2000). Understanding entrepreneurial learning: A question of how? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 6(3), 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. (2006). Entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework for technology-based enterprise. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. (2009). Connecting entrepreneurial and action learning in student-initiated new business ventures: The case of SPEED. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 6(3), 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D., & Carswell, M. (2001). Towards a conceptual understanding of entrepreneurial learning. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 8(2), 150–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuber, A. R., Dyke, L. S., & Fischer, E. M. (1990). Experiential acquired knowledge and entrepreneurial venture success. In L.R. Jauch & J.L. Wall (Eds.), Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, (pp. 69–73). San Francisco: Academy of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuber, A. R., & Fischer, E. M. (1993). The learning experiences of entrepreneurs. In N. C. Churchill, S. Birley, J. Doutriaux, E. J. Gatewood, F. S. Hoy, & W. E. Wetzel Jr. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 234–245). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzello, S. (1999). The economics of the mind. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (1996). Management (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. P., & DeCenzo, D. A. (2008). Fundamentals of management: Essential concepts and applications (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, P. J., Roberts, D. R., & Porras, J. I. (1993). Dynamics of planned organizational change: Assessing empirical support for a theoretical model. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 619–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstiel, L. (2011). Employee behavior in organizations: On the current state of research. Management Revue, 22(4), 344–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims Jr., H. P. (1977). The leader as a manager of reinforcement contingencies: An empirical example and a model. In J. G. Hunt & L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge (pp. 121–137). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speier, C., & Frese, M. (1997). Generalized self-efficacy as a mediator and moderator between control and complexity at work and personal initiative: A longitudinal field study in East Germany. Human Performance, 10(2), 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J. A., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., et al. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, G. (1963). Some notes on power equalization. In H. J. Leavitt & H. A. Latané (Eds.), The social science of organizations: Four perspectives (pp. 39–84). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, R. (2000). Entrepreneurial learning and mentoring. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Behaviour & Research, 6(3), 160–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sully de Luque, M. F., & Sommer, S. M. (2000). The impact of culture on feedback-seeking behavior: An integrated model and propositions. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 829–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasa, K., Sears, G. J., & Schat, A. C. H. (2011). Personality and teamwork behavior in context: The cross-level moderating role of collective efficacy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turvani, M. (2001). Microfoundations of knowledge dynamics within the firm. Industry and Innovation, 8(3), 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuuli, M. M., & Rowlinson, S. (2009). Empowerment in project teams: A multilevel examination of the job performance implications. Construction Management and Economics, 27(5), 473–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Woerkom, M. (2003). Critical reflection at work: Bridging individual and organizational learning. Enschede: Twente University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. L., & Chugh, H. (2014). Entrepreneurial learning: Past research and future challenges. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(1), 24–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, L. (2004). A systemic approach to entrepreneurial learning: An exploration using storytelling. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L., & Zhu, X.-C. (2008). An explanation of individual knowledge and behavior based on empirical substrata. The ICFAI Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(3), 39–69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karim Moustaghfir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moustaghfir, K., Secundo, G. (2016). Entrepreneurial Learning Processes for Technology-Driven Entrepreneurship: Assumptions and Behavioural Dynamics for an Integrative Framework. In: Passiante, G., Romano, A. (eds) Creating Technology-Driven Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59156-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics