Abstract
This chapter shows how portfolio values differ from NPVs when decisions are taken under conditions of managerial flexibility. Applying the Portfolio Strategic Options approach, the certainty of payoffs is traded off against the prospect of variable, albeit higher, returns when prices are high. Through a discovery process with adaptive actions, technology choices are better aligned to the managers’ risk-payoff preferences by choosing from amongst these generic supply strategies: (a) indexing energy costs and power prices to achieve predictability in payoffs; (b) increasing renewables with the expectation of rising prices; or (c) hedge payoffs by balancing fossil fuels-based supplies with renewables. This dynamic approach guides managerial actions to recognise the realities of inherently volatile energy markets and adaptively profit from uncertainties.
References
Arrow, K. J. (1964). The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk bearing. Review of Economic Studies, 31(2), 91–96.
Bar-Lev, D., & Katz, S. (1976). A portfolio approach to fossil fuel procurement in the electric utility industry. The Journal of Finance, 31(3), 933–947.
Barcelona, R. G. (2015). Renewable energy with volatile prices: Why NPV fails to tell the whole story. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 27(1), 101–109.
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). (2016, March 12). Doubts over EDF’s plans for Hinkley Point nuclear power station.
Botterud, A., & Korpăs, M. (2007). A stochastic dynamic model for optimal timing of investments in new generation capacity in restructured power systems. Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 29, 163–174.
BP Statistical Review. (2016). Retrieved http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2016/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2016-full-report.pdf. Accessed 16 December 2016.
BP Energy Outlook. (2016). http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/energy-outlook-2035.html. Accessed 16 December 2016.
Driouchi, T., Leseure, M., & Bennet, D. (2009). A robustness framework for monitoring real options under uncertainty. OMEGA, 37, 698–710.
EIA—Energy Information Administration. (2014). International energy outlook, 2014. Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration.
Gerrar, M. B. (1993). The victim of NIMBY. Fordham Urban Law Journal., 21(3), 495–522.
Littlechild, S. C. (2001). “Competition and regulation in the UK electricity industry (with a brief look at California). Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 13(4), 21–38.
Parker, D. (2012). The official history of privatisation: Popular capitalism, 1987–1997 (Vol. II). Oxon: Routledge.
Parker, D., & Kirkpatrick, C. (2005). Privatisation in developing countries: A review of the evidence and policy lessons. The Journal of Development Studies, 41(4), 513–541.
Saenz de Miera, G., Rio Gonzalez, P., & Vizcaina, I. (2008). Analyzing the impact of renewable electricity support schemes on power prices: The case of wind electricity in Spain. Energy Policy, 36(9), 3345–3359.
The Telegraph. (2003, October 2). Deal keeps lights on at British Energy.
Union of Concerned Scientists—UCS. (2016). http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-power/nuclear-power-accidents/history-nuclear-accidents#.WFO_RndDm1s. Accessed 16 December 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barcelona, R.G. (2017). Valuing Managerial Flexibility. In: Energy Investments. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59139-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59139-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59138-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59139-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)