Abstract
This chapter explores toys as ‘gatherings’ of players that communicate a sense of the player’s world and its concerns to other players and non-players The examination of Banarasi toys illustrates the quintessential property of Play-things to gather, negotiate, and communicate matters of concern. These Things (Dincs) gather players into rituals and ceremonies, as well as for assembling and negotiating concerns as manifested in canons, conventions, and beliefs for embodying in the Play-thing. This perspective broadens the definition of Banarasi toys from a ludic expression alone to a cultural representation. In this sense, Play-Things communicate not only what they are, but also the mind of the players.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Appadurai, A. (1988). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). The system of collecting. In J. Elsener & R. Cardinal (Eds.), The cultures of collecting (pp. 8–38). London: Reaktion Publishers.
Brown, B. (1998). How to do things with things (a toy story). Critical Inquiry, 24(4), 935–964.
Coomarswamy. (1977). The part of art in Indian life. In R. Lipsey (Ed.), Coomarswamy: Selected papers (pp. 80). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Cornell‚ P. (1993). Saker. Om tingens synlighet. (Quotes translated by Per Linde.) Hedemora: Gidlunds Förlag.
Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Forty‚ A. (1986). Objects of Desire. New York: Pantheon Books.
Heidegger‚ M. (1971). Poetry‚ Language‚ Thought. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought (reissued in 2013).
Huizinga‚ J. (1955). Homo ludens. Boston: The Beacon Press.
Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and society studies in the sociology of culture past and present (vol. 6, pp. 1–40). Greenwich: Jai Press.
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.
Latour, B. (2008). A Cautious Prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design (with special attention to Peter Sloterdijk). Falmouth, Cornwall, Annual International Conference of the Design History Society.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Patil‚ K. (2015). Designing without a designer: A case study of decision making in banarasi toys. The International Journal of Designed Objects‚ 9(3)‚ 1–17.
Patil, K., & Athavankar, U. (2012). Un-authored artifacts: It takes a whole community to make a khilona (pp. 37–45). Melbourne: Australia, University of South Denmark.
Roopnarine, J., Hossain, Z., Gill, P., & Brophy, H. (1994). Play in East Indian context. Children’s play in diverse cultures (pp. 9–31). Albany: State University of New York.
Schwartzman, B. (1978). Transformations: The anthropology of children’s play. New York: Plenum Press.
Telier, A., et al. (2011). Design things. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Patil, K. (2018). Dincs as Worldviews: Things that Communicate a Mind. In: Magalhães, L., Goldstein, J. (eds) Toys and Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59136-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59136-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59135-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59136-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)