Toys: Between Rhetoric of Education and Rhetoric of Fun

  • Gilles BrougèreEmail author


A toy is mainly an object addressed to children. It must persuade children or parents who are its addressee. To analyze this kind of communication, we can use the notion of rhetoric—that is, what the toy means to its recipient, how the object seduces, catches, and captures the consumer and/or the user, child, or adult on behalf of the child. The main way today is to make the object fun, mainly in relationship to children’s mass culture—that is, a rhetoric of fun. Another way is to connect children with education or development. The toy or other goods for children are seen as educational tools; that means they are for children and only for them. But if the rhetoric of education has become less central and important for the toys, it still perpetuates this mainly for younger children who are more dependent on the adult’s choice. The chapter has as its objective to show the rhetoric of education in some contemporary toys, and analyzes education more as a discourse, an image than a reality.


  1. Brougère, G. (1995). Jeu et education. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  2. Brougère, G. (2003). Jouets et compagnie. Paris: Stock.Google Scholar
  3. Brougère, G. (2005). Jouer/Apprendre. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  4. Brougère, G. (2014). Toys or the rhetoric of children’s goods. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual Communication. Berlin: DeGruyter Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Charaudeau, P. (1997). Le discours d’information médiatique., La construction du miroir social. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
  6. Cross, G. (1997). Kids’ Stuff—Toys and the changing world of American childhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design element to Gamefulness: defining “gamification”. MindTrek 11. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments. Tampere, Finland, 28–30 September 2011.Google Scholar
  8. Ito, M. (2008). Education vs. entertainment: A cultural history of children’s software. In K. Salen (Ed.). The ecology of games—connecting youth, games, and learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. MAD [Musée des arts décoratifs]. (1977). Jouets américains. 1925–1975. Paris: MAD.Google Scholar
  10. Manson, M. (2001). Jouets de Toujours. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  11. Soëtard, M. (1990). Friedrich Fröbel. Pédagogie et Vie. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  12. Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The Ambiguity of Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Paris 13—Sorbonne Paris CitéVilletaneuseFrance

Personalised recommendations