The End of Play and the Fate of Digital Play Media: A Historical Perspective on the Marketing of Play Culture

  • Stephen KlineEmail author


Merging the insights of Brian Sutton-Smith and Marshall McLuhan, this chapter argues for the application of media analysis to cultural-historical research into modern playthings and cultures. Reflecting on the 25 years I have spent researching the marketing of play media, I argue that theorists of play, as well as the critiques of children’s toys and games, have recognized the growing role that global marketing dynamics now play in the design, distribution, and use of global playthings.


Media Player Cultural Play Digital Play Brian Sutton-Smith Plaything 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  2. Brougère, G. (2003). Jouet et compagnie. Paris: Archambault.Google Scholar
  3. Caillois, R. (1961). Man, Play and Games. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carlsson-Paige, Nancy, & Levin, Diane. (1987). The war play dilemma: Balancing needs and values in the early childhood classroom. New York: Teachers College Press Columbia.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, E. (2007). The real toy story: Inside the ruthless battle for America’s youngest consumers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cross, G. (1997). Kids’ stuff: Toys and the changing world of American childhood. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gifts and Toys. (2009). Toy sales gain ground in global markets, Dec, July 29.Google Scholar
  8. Gifts and Toys. (2016). NPD: Toy Sales Up 6% in Q1 May 4, 2016.
  9. Goldstein, J. (1998). Why we watch: The attractions of violent entertainment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Groos, K. (1901). The theory of play. In The play of man (Elizabeth L. Baldwin, transl.). New York: Appleton. Chapter 8, pp. 361–406.Google Scholar
  11. Hjarvard, Stig. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo Ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  13. Kline, S. (1993). Out of the garden. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Kline, S. (2003a). Learners, spectators or gamers in the media saturated household? An investigation of the impact of the internet on children’s audiences. In J. Goldstein, D. Buckingham, & G. Brougère (Eds.), Toys, games and media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Kline, S. (2003b). Toys as communication. In A. Nelson, L.-E. Berg & K. Svensson. Toy research in the late twentieth century. Part 2. Halmstad University, Sweden. ISBN 91-974811-2-2.Google Scholar
  16. Kline, S. (2015). The ends of history and the tyranny of the algorithm. Kinephanos:
  17. Kline, S., Dyer-Witherford, N., & de Peuter, G. (2003). Digital play. The interaction of technology markets and culture. Montreal: McGill U. Press.Google Scholar
  18. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  19. Pellegrini, A. (1995). The future of play theory: A multidisciplinary inquiry into the contributions of Brian Sutton-Smith. Albany NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, Peter K. (1988). Children’s play and its role in early development: A re-evaluation of the ‘Play Ethos’. In A. D. Pellegrini (Ed.), Psychological bases for early education (pp. 207–226). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Sutton-Smith, B. (1984). Text and context in imaginative play. In Frank Kessel & Artin Goncu (Eds.), Analysing children’s play dialogues: New directions for child development, no 25. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Sutton-Smith, B. (1986). Toys and culture. Boston: Gardiner Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations