Advertisement

Transnational Dalit Feminists In Between the Indian State, the UN and the Global Justice Movement

Chapter
  • 322 Downloads
Part of the Rethinking International Development series book series (RID)

Abstract

This chapter explores to what extent Dalit feminists have been able to challenge their marginal position as so-called untouchables by way of transnational relations. Over the last few decades, Dalit feminists have bypassed the Indian state and, on the one hand, turned to the UN in an international context, and on the other hand, turned transnationally to activists in other countries and continents, thus playing an active part in both the Global Justice Movement and the World Social Forums (WSFs). I will discuss how we might conceptualize their involvement in these two different contexts—the UN and the Global Justice Movement—as well as how these involvements both differ and relate to each other, and to the Indian state.

Keywords

Social Movement Indian State World Trade Organization Caste System Schedule Caste 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agnes, F. (2008). Women’s movements in a secular framework: Redefining the agendas. In M. E. John (Ed.), Women’s studies in India: A reader. New Delhi: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, S. E. (1999). Advocating feminism: The Latin American feminist NGO ‘boom’. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 1(2), 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarez, S. E. (2014). Beyond NGOization?: Reflections from Latin America. In V. Bernal & I. Grewal (Eds.), Theorizing NGOs: States, feminisms, and neoliberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. _____. 2009. ‘Beyond NGOization? Reflections from Latin America’. Development 52(2): 175–84.Google Scholar
  5. Alvarez, S. E., Dagnino, E., & Escobar, A. (Eds.) (1998). Cultures of politics, politics of cultures: Re-visioning Latin American social movements. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  6. Amos, T. D. (2011). Embodying difference—The making of burakumin in modern Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bernal, V., & Grewal, I. (Eds.) (2014). Theorizing NGOs: States, feminisms, and neoliberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bob, C. (2007). Dalit rights are human rights’: Caste discrimination, international activism, and the construction of a new human rights issues. Human Rights Quarterly, 29, 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choudry, A., & Kapoor, D. (2013). NGOization: complicity contradictions and prospects. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  10. Conway, J. M. (2013). Edges of global justice: The world social forum and its ‘others’. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Desai, M. (1999). Transnationalism: The face of feminist politics post-Beijing. International Social Science Journal, 57(2), 319–330.Google Scholar
  12. Desai, M. (2008). Gender and the Politics of Possibilities: Rethinking Globalization. Boulder, CO, Lanham, MD, New York, Plymouth, and Toronto: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  13. Desai, M. (2013). The possibilities and perils for scholar-activists and activist-scholars: Reflections on the feminist dialogues. In J. S. Juris & A. Khasnabish. (Eds.), Insurgent encounters: Transnational activism, ethnography, and the political. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Eschle, C., & Maiguashca, B. (2010). Making feminist sense of the global justice movement. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, W. F., & Ponniah, T. (Eds.) (2003). Another world is possible: Popular alternatives to globalization at the world social forums. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  16. Guru, G. (1995). Dalit women talk differently. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(41–42), 2548–2550.Google Scholar
  17. Hankins, J. D. (2014). Working skin: Making leather, making a multicultural Japan. Oakland: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2003). Foreword. In W. F. Fisher & T. Ponniah (Eds.), Another world is Possible: Popular alternatives to globalization at the world social forums. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  19. Hardtmann, E. (2009). The Dalit movement in India: Local practices, global connections. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hardtmann, E. (forthcoming, 2016). South Asian activists in the global justice movement. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Harvey, D. (2010). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jaffrelot, C. (2003). India’s silent revolution: The rise of the low castes in North Indian politics. Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
  23. Juergensmeyer, M. (1982). Religion as social vision: The movement against untouchability in the 20th century Punjab. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Juris, J. S. (2008). Networking futures—The movements against corporate globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Juris, J. S., & Khasnabish, A. (Eds.) (2013). Insurgent encounters—Transnational activism, ethnography, and the political. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Karim, L. (2008). Demystifying micro-credit: The Grameen Bank, NGOs, and neoliberalism in Bangladesh. Cultural Dynamics, 20(5), 1–29.Google Scholar
  27. Karim, L. (2011). Microfinance and its discontents—Women in debt in Bangladesh. London: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Transnational advocacy networks in the movement society. In D. S. Meyer & S. Tarrow (Eds.), The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Klein, N. (2001). A fete for the end of the end of history, The Nation. Retrieved from March 19, 2001. http://www.thenation.com/article/fete-end-end-history#axzz2fLRFCZrs
  30. Klein, N. (2008). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  31. Loomba, A., & Lukose, R. A. (Eds.) (2012). South Asian feminisms. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Manorama, R. (2013). Dalit women in struggle: Transforming pain into power. In S. M. Channa & J. P. Mencher (Eds.), Life as Dalit: Views from the bottom on caste in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Murugkar, L. (1991). Dalit panther movement in Maharashtra. London: Sangam Books.Google Scholar
  34. Naples, N. A., & Desai, M. (Eds.) (2002). Women’s activism and globalization: Linking local struggles and transnational politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Neary, I. (2010). Human rights in the discourse of Buraku liberation: From the 1920s to the 1990s. Development and Society, 39(2), 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olesen, T. (2004). The transnational Zapatista solidarity networks: An infrastructure analysis. Global Networks, 4(1), 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Omvedt, G. (1994). Dalits and the democratic revolution: Dr Ambedkar and the Dalit movement in colonial India. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Pawar, U., & Moon, M. (2008). We also made history: Women in the Ambedkarite movement. New Delhi: Zubaan Books.Google Scholar
  39. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ram, R. (2004a). Untouchability, Dalit consciousness, and the Ad Dharm movement in Punjab. Contributions to Indian sociology, 38(3), 323–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ram, R. (2004b). Untouchability in India with a difference: Ad Dharm, Dalit assertion, and caste conflicts in Punjab. Asian Survey, 44(6), 892–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roy, S. (2015). The Indian women’s movement: Within and beyond the NGOization. Journal of South Asian Development, 10(1), 96–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sen, J., Anand, A., Escobar, A., & Waterman, P. (Eds.) (2004). World social forum: Challenging empires. New Delhi: Viveka foundation.Google Scholar
  44. Setalvad, T. (2001). Thrice Oppressed, Communalism Combat, 8/69. Google Scholar
  45. Ståhlberg, P. (2002). The illicit Daughter: Hindi-language newspapers and the regionalisation of the public sphere in India. In E. Poluha & M. Rosendahl (Eds.), Contesting “good’ governance: Cross-cultural perspectives on representation, accountability and public space. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
  46. Vargas, V. (2003). Feminism, globalization and the global justice and solidarity movement. Cultural Studies, 17(6), 905–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Waghmore, S. (2012). Beyond depoliticisation? Caste, NGOs and Dalit land rights in Maharahstra, India. Development and Change, 42(6), 1313–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Whitaker, C. (2009). The world social forum as open space. In J. Sen, A. Anand, A. Escobar, & P. Waterman (Eds.), World social forum: Challenging empires. New Delhi: Viveka Foundation.Google Scholar
  49. Zelliot, E. (1992). From untouchable to Dalit—Essays on Ambedkar movement. New Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations