The Slow-Motion Counterrevolution: Developmental Contradictions and the Emergence of Neoliberalism

Part of the Rethinking International Development series book series (RID)


The Modi government represents the greatest threat Indian democracy has faced and this paper seeks uncover better what it represents, the dangers it contains and the possibilities for resistance to it. To understand the current government better, and to better distinguish it from the wider rightward drift in Indian politics that has long been evident, this paper presents an original understanding of the shifts in India’s political economy in marketist direction, dating it back to the late 1960s. It was the work of the middle caste landed classes whose power is not often recognized and their transformation into more and less successful Provincial Propertied Classes (PPCs) is the key social development that explains the political changes – the decline of Congress, the rise of the Parties of the Provincial Propertied Classes (PPPCs) and the rise of Hindutva – in the decades since that have moved Indian politics to the right. The Modi government represents, however, an even narrower class, the Indian corporate class, than previous governments and could be endangering the social alliance that brought it to power.


Modus Government Land Reform Capitalist Relation Structural Adjustment Programme Capitalist Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ahmad, A. (1992). In theory: Classes, nations, literatures. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmad, A. (1996). In the eye of the storm: The left chooses. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(22), 1329–1343.Google Scholar
  3. Bagchi, A. K. (2014). Sealing the victory of the corporate sector. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(24), 16–18.Google Scholar
  4. Balagopal, K. (1987). An ideology for the provincial propertied class. Economic and Political Weekly, 22(36–37), 1546–1547.Google Scholar
  5. Balagopal, K. (2006). Maoist movement in Andhra Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(29), 3183–3187.Google Scholar
  6. Bardhan, P. (1988). Dominant proprietary classes and India’s democracy. In A. Kohli (Ed.), India’s democracy. Princeton University Press: Princeton.Google Scholar
  7. Baru, S. (2000). Economic policy and the development of capitalism in India: The role of regional capitalists and political parties. In F. Frankel et al. (Eds.), Transforming India: Social and political dynamics of democracy. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bhagwati, J., & Chakravarty, S. (1969). Contributions to Indian economic analysis: A survey. American Economic Review, 59(4), 2–73.Google Scholar
  9. Bhagwati, J., & Desai, P. (1970). India: Planning for industrialization—Industrialization and trade policies since 1951. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bharadwaj, K. (1995). Regional differentiation in India. In T. V. Satyamurthy (Ed.), Industry and agriculture in India since independence. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Byres, T. J. (1974). Land reform, industrialization and the marketed surplus: An essay on the power of rural bias. In D. Lehmann (Ed.), Agrarian reform and agrarian reformism. London: Faber.Google Scholar
  12. Byres, T. J. (1998). Introduction: The major debates on the Indian economy since independence: Boundaries, context and content. In T. J. Byres (Ed.), The Indian economy: Major debates since independence. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Casolari, M. (2000). Hindutva’s foreign tieup in the 1930s: Archival evidence. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(4), 218–228.Google Scholar
  14. Chakravorty, S. (1987). Development planning: The Indian experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. Desai, R. (2004a). Slouching towards Ayodhya: From Congress to Hindutva in Indian politics—Second revised edition. New Delhi: Three Essays.Google Scholar
  17. Desai, R. (2004b). Forward march of Hindutva halted? New Left Review, 30, 49–67.Google Scholar
  18. Desai, R. (2010). Hindutva’s ebbing tide? In S. Ruparelia, S. Corbridge, J. Harriss, & S. Reddy (Eds.), India’s new political economy: A great transformation? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Desai, R. (2011). Gujarat’s Hindutva of capitalist development. South Asia, 34(3), 354–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Desai, R. (2014). A latter day fascism. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(35), 48–58.Google Scholar
  21. Desai, R. (2016) ‘The Question of Fascism’. Hasan Suroor (ed) Modi’s New India, New Delhi, Harper Collins, 2015.Google Scholar
  22. Dutt, R. C. (1902). Economic history of India. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trübner & co.Google Scholar
  23. Frankel, F. (1978). India’s political economy 1947–1977: The gradual revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Frankel, F., & Rao, M. S. A. (1991). State power and dominance in modern India (Vol. 2). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ganguly, B. N. (1977). Indian economic thought: Nineteenth century perspectives. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Co Ltd.Google Scholar
  26. Ghatak, M., Ghosh, P., & Kotwal, A. (2014). Growth in the time of the UPA. Economic & Political Weekly, 49(16), 34–43.Google Scholar
  27. Ghosh, J. (1998). Liberalization debates. In T. J. Byres (Ed.), The Indian economy: Major debates since independence. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gramsci, A. (1972). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Kaviraj, S. (1997). Critique of the passive revolution. In P. Chatterjee (Ed.), State and politics in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lipton, M. (1977). Why poor people stay poor: A study of urban bias in World development. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  31. Mishra, P. (1995). Butter chicken in Ludhiana. New Delhi: Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. Nairn, T. (1977). The break-up of Britain. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  33. Naoroji, D. (1901/1962). Poverty and un-british rule in India. New Delhi: Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.Google Scholar
  34. Nielsen, K., & Nilsen, A. G. (2015). Law struggles and hegemonic processes in neoliberal India: Gramscian reflections on land acquisition legislation. Globalizations, 12(2), 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Neill, J. (2001). Building Better Global Economic BRICs, Global Economics Paper 33 Goldman Sachs. Retrieved from
  36. Panagariya, A. (2014). The Promise of Modinomics. Retrieved from
  37. Patnaik, P. (1995). Whatever happened to imperialism and other essays. New Delhi: Tulika.Google Scholar
  38. Patnaik, P. (1998). Some debates on Indian planning. In T. J. Byres (Ed.), The Indian economy: Major debates since independence. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Patnaik, U. (2009). The free lunch—Transfers from the tropical colonies and their role in capital formation in Britain during the industrial revolution. In K. S. Jomo (Ed.), Globalization under hegemony. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Patnaik, P. (2012a). The left in decline. Economic & Political Weekly, 47(10).Google Scholar
  41. Patnaik, P. (2012b). The return to orthodoxy. Retrieved from
  42. Patnaik, P., Chandrashekher, C. P., & Sen, A. (1996). The proliferation of the bourgeoisie and economic policy. In T. V. Satyamurthy (Ed.), Class formation and political transformation in post-colonial India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rai, P. (2009). Issues in General Election 2009. Economic and Political Weekly, 65(39), 82.Google Scholar
  44. Rutten, M. (1995). Farms and factories: Social profile of large farmers and rural industrialists in West India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Satyamurthy, T. V. (1997). The impact of centre-state relations on Indian politics: An interpretive reckoning 1947–1987. In P. Chatterjee (Ed.), State and politics in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Shenoy, B.R. (1955). A note of dissent on the memorandum of the economists’ panel entitled basic considerations relating to the plan frame of the Second Five Year Plan. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  47. Shenoy, B. R. (1963). Indian planning and economic development. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
  48. Shenoy, B. R. (1968). Indian economic policy. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.Google Scholar
  49. Srinivas, M. N. (1987). The Dominant Caste and Other Essays. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Stern, R. (2003). Changing India: Bourgeois revolution on the sub-continent—Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vardharajan, S. (2014). The best democracy money can buy. The Economic Times, 30 April.Google Scholar
  52. Varma, P. (1998). The great Indian middle class. New Delhi: Viking.Google Scholar
  53. Vidyasagar, R. (1996). New agrarianism and challenges for the left. In T. V. Satyamurthy (Ed.), Class formation and political transformation in postcolonial India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Studies451 University CollegeWinnipeg, MBCanada

Personalised recommendations