Abstract
This chapter reflects on strategies aimed at improving the material and political conditions of India’s labouring class. It does so through an analysis of two prominent Indian social movements that engages with debates about where the fundamental fault-lines of domination and collective action lie. In line with approaches that recognise class differences within the countryside as well as transnational aspects of exploitation, it argues that cross-class alliances are not in labour’s interests, and should be rejected in favour of organising ‘classes of labour’. This requires place and time-sensitive strategies, which may include engagement with the state when this can augment labour’s room for political manoeuvre. Undue acceleration of pro-labour strategies may trigger countermoves that leave it in a worst position, while undue hesitancy can unnecessarily restrict the scope of change and hold down the material conditions of millions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agarwala, R. (2013). Informal labor, formal politics, and dignified discontent in India. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Alavi, H. (1973). Peasants and revolution. In K. Gough & H. Sharma (Eds.), Imperialism and revolution in South Asia. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Assadi, M. (1997). Peasant movement in Karnataka 1980–1994. Delhi: Shipra.
Banaji, J. (1994). The farmers’ movement: A critique of conservative rural coalitions. Journal of Peasant Studies, 21(3–4), 228–245.
Bernstein, H. (2006). Is there an agrarian question in the twenty-first century? Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 27(4), 449–460.
Bernstein, H. (2013). Food sovereignty: A sceptical view. Conference Paper, Food Sovereignty: A Critical Dialogue International Conference, Yale University, September 14–15, 2013. https://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/download/1_bernstein_2013.pdf
Bharadwaj, K. (1985). A view on commercialisation in Indian agriculture and the development of capitalism. Journal of Peasant Studies, 12(4), 7–25.
Breman, J. (1990). ‘Even dogs are better off’: The ongoing battle between capital and labour in the cane-fields of Gujarat. Journal of Peasant Studies, 17(4), 546–608.
Breman, J., & Guerin, I. (2009). Introduction: Of bondage old and new. In J. Breman, I. Guerin, & A. Prakash (Eds.), India’s workforce: Of bondage old and new. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Communist Party of India (Maoist) (CPI (Maoist)). (2004). Party Programme. Central Committee (P). Retrieved January 12, 2016, from http://www.bannedthought.net/India/CPI-Maoist-Docs/Founding/Programme-pamphlet.pdf.
Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (CPI (ML)). (n.d.). Agrarian Programme. Retrieved November 11, 2015, from http://www.cpiml.org/8th_congress/cpiml_agrarian_programme.html
Featherstone, D. (2003). Spatialities of transnational resistance to globalization: The maps of grievance of the inter-continental caravan. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(4), 404–421.
Harriss, J. (1992). Does the “depressor’ still work? Agrarian structure and development in India: A review of evidence and argument. Journal of Peasant Studies, 19(2), 189–227.
Jeffrey, C and Lerche, J. (2000). Stating the Difference: State, Discourse and Class Reproduction in Uttar Pradesh, India. Development and Change 31(4): 857–878.
Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha. (1999, 21 November). KRRS Newsletter No. 1: News from the Karnataka State Farmers’ Association. e-mail communication.
Kunnath, G. (2009). Smouldering Dalit fires in Bihar, India. Dialectical Anthropology, 33, 309–325.
Kunnath, G. (2012). Rebels from the mud houses: Dalits and the making of the Maoist revolution in Bihar. New Delhi: Social Science Press.
Lerche, J. (1999). Politics of the Poor: Agricultural Labourers and Political Transformations in Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Peasant Studies 26,(2–3), 182–241.
Lerche, J. (2013). The agrarian question in neoliberal India: Agrarian transition bypassed? Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(3), 382–404.
Lindberg, S. (1992). Peasants and democracy? Farmers’ agitation and the state in India. In Lars Rudebeck (Ed.), The democratic potential of third world popular movements. Uppsala: Uppsala University Akut Working Group for the Study of Development Strategies.
Madsen, S. T. (2001). The view from Vevey. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(39), 3733–3742.
McMichael, P. (2008). Peasants make their own history, but not just as they please …. Journal of Agrarian Change, 8(2–3), 205–228.
Nadkarni, M. V. (1987). Farmers’ movements in India. Ahmedabad: Allied.
Nielsen, K. B. (2015). ‘Community’ and the politics of caste, class, and representation in the Singur movement, West Bengal. In A. Nilsen & S. Roy (Eds.), New subaltern politics: Reconceptualising hegemony and resistance in contemporary India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Nilsen, A. G. (2013). Dispossession and resistance in India: The river and the rage. London: Routledge.
Omvedt, G. (1993). Reinventing revolution: New social movements and the socialist tradition in India. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.
Patnaik, U. (2006). The agrarian crisis and importance of peasant resistance. People’s Democracy, 30(5). http://archives.peoplesdemocracy.in/2006/0129/01292006_utsa.htm.
Pattenden, J. (2006). The political economy of social movements: The anti-capitalist globalisation movements, the Karnataka State Farmers Association and the dynamics of social transformation in rural South India. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Pattenden, J. (2011). Gatekeeping as accumulation and domination: Evidence from South India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(2), 164–194.
Pattenden, J. (2015). Class and social policy: The national rural employment guarantee scheme in Karnataka, India. Journal of Agrarian Change published on early view. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joac.12127/abstract?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=
Pattenden, J. (2016a). Labour, state and society in rural India: A class-relational approach. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Pattenden, J. (2016b). Working at the margins of global production networks: Labour control regimes and rural-based Labourers in South India. Forthcoming in Third World Quarterly.
Rawal, V. (2008). Ownership holdings of land in rural India: Putting the recordstraight. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(10), 43–47.
Roesch, M., Venkatasubramanian, G., & Guerin, I. (2009). Bonded labour in rice mills: Fate or opportunity? In J. Breman, I. Guerin, & A. Prakash (Eds.), India’s unfree workforce: Of bondage old and new. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Sainath, P. (2015). The slaughter of suicide data. Retrieved November 14, 2015, from https://psainath.org/the-slaughter-of-suicide-data/
Varshney, A. (1995). Democracy, development and the countryside: Urban-rural struggles in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, K. (1999). Patterns of accumulation and struggles of rural labour: Some aspects of agrarian change in Central Bihar. In T. Byres, K. Kapadia, & J. Lerche (Eds.), Rural labour relations in India. London: Frank Cass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pattenden, J. (2016). Blind Alleys and Red Herrings? Social Movements, the State, Class Alliances and Pro-Labouring Class Strategy. In: Nielsen, K., Nilsen, A. (eds) Social Movements and the State in India. Rethinking International Development series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59133-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59133-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59132-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59133-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)