Abstract
This volume represents new work in the history of women’s education in the United States. As we think about future research on the history of women’s education, I suggest some potential directions. In this chapter, I consider what sociologist Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of social reproduction might offer to historians of women’s education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Pierre Bourdieu and Jean-Claude Passeron, Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture (New York: Safe Publications, 2nd ed., 1990).
- 2.
Christine Woyshner, The National PTA, Race, & Civic Engagement, 1897–1970 (Columbus: The Ohio State University, 2009).
- 3.
Like Foucault, Bourdieu seldom directly addressed gender, although he did write about masculinity. See Pierre Bourdieu, Masculine Domination (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2002). Also see Lisa Adkins and Beverley Skeggs, Eds., Feminism after Bourdieu (London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2005).
- 4.
For instance, see Diane Reay, “Gendering Bourdieu’s Concept of Capitals? Emotional Capital, Women and Social Class,” in Adkins and Skeggs, Feminism after Bourdieu, 57–74.
- 5.
Thanks to Begoña Echeverria for helping me think about Bourdieu and gender.
- 6.
Laurel Thatcher Ulrich, Well-Behaved Women Seldom Make History (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007), 227.
- 7.
Ulrich, Well-Behaved Women, 227.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nash, M.A. (2018). Epilogue. In: Nash, M.A. (eds) Women’s Higher Education in the United States. Historical Studies in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59084-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59084-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59083-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59084-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)