Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Palgrave Handbook of Women’s Political Rights pp 437–453Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

United States: Gendered Institutions, Processes, and Outcomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 2870 Accesses

Part of the book series: Gender and Politics ((GAP))

Abstract

Dittmar argues that the exclusion of women at the nation’s founding and amid the creation of today’s constitutional system reinforced a long-established norm of male dominance in political leadership within American political institutions. The dominance of men and masculinity persists in U.S. politics today, most clearly in the underrepresentation of women at all levels of elected office. She reviews the history of women’s formal and informal eligibility for and acquisition of political offices, discussing both barriers to and strategies for increasing women’s political representation. Included among those strategies is making a strong case to aspirants, voters, and practitioners about the value of electing women. She concludes by revealing the ways in which women both disrupt and influence American political institutions, processes, and outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Adams, Kimberly S. 2007. Different Faces, Different Priorities: Agenda-Setting Behavior in the Mississippi, Maryland, and Georgia State Legislatures. Nebula 4 (2): 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, Kristi. 1996. After Suffrage: Women in Partisan and Electoral Politics Before the New Deal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, William D., Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, and Valeria Sinclair-Chapman. 2003. The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly 28 (3): 357–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anzia, Sarah F., and Christopher R. Berry. 2011. The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen? American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 478–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2003. Not All Cues Are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement. Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1040–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Nancy Carrillo. 2007. More Is Better: The Influence of Collective Female Descriptive Representation on External Efficacy. Politics & Gender 3 (1): 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, Edith J. 2001. Black Women in State Legislatures: The Relationship of Race and Gender to the Legislative Experience. In The Impact of Women in Public Office, ed. Susan J. Carroll, 185–204. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedolla, Lisa Garcia, Katherine Tate, and Janelle Wong. 2014. Indelible Effects: The Impact of Women of Color in the U.S. Congress. In Women and Elective Office, 3rd ed., ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bejarano, Christina E. 2013. The Latina Advantage: Gender, Race, and Political Success. Austin: University of Texas.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, Kathleen A., and Kerry L. Haynie. 1999. Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race. The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 658–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, Kathleen A., Kerry L. Haynie, and Beth Reingold. 2006. Agenda Setting and African American Women in State Legislatures. Journal of Women Politics & Policy 28 (3–4): 71–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2013. He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Nadia. 2014. Sisters in the Statehouse: Black Women and Legislative Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Nadia, and Kira Hudson Banks. 2014. Black Women’s Agenda Setting in the Maryland State Legislature. Journal of African American Studies 18 (2): 164–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, Barbara. 2014. Gender in Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, David E., and Christina Wolbrecht. 2006. See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents. Journal of Politics 68 (2): 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Susan J. 2001. The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Susan J. 2002. Representing Women: Congresswomen’s Perceptions of Their Representational Roles. In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Cindy Simon Rosenthal. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Susan J., and Kira Sanbonmatsu. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Susan J., and Krista Jenkins. 2001. Unrealized Opportunity? Term Limits and the Representation of Women in State Legislatures. Women & Politics 23 (4): 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). 2017a. History of Women in Congress. Available http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/history-women-us-congress.

  • Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). 2017b. Women in Elective Office. Available http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/women-elective-office-2017.

  • Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). 2017c. Women of Color in Elective Office. Available http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/women-color-elective-office-2017.

  • Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). 2017d. Summary of Women Candidates for Selected Offices. Available http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/can_histsum.pdf.

  • Cha, J. Mijin, and Miles Rapoport. 2013. Fresh Start: The Impact of Public Campaign Financing in Connecticut. Demos. Available http://www.demos.org/publication/fresh-start-impact-public-campaign-financing-connecticut.

  • Clayton, Dewey M., and Angela M. Stallings. 2000. Black Women in Congress: Striking the Balance. Journal of Black Studies 30: 574–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespin, Michael H., and Janna L. Deitz. 2010. If You Can’t Join ‘Em, Beat ‘Em: The Gender Gap in Individual Donations to Congressional Candidates. Political Research Quarterly 63 (3): 581–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2013. Gendered Recruitment Without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women’s Representation. Politics & Gender 9 (4): 390–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder-Meyer, Melody, and Rosalyn Cooperman. 2015. Can’t Buy Them Love: How Party Culture among Donors Contributes to the Party Gap in Women’s Representation. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, Kelly. 2014. Money in Politics with a Gender Lens. Joint Report by the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University and the National Council for Research on Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, Kelly. 2015. Encouragement Is Not Enough: Addressing Social and Structural Barriers to Female Recruitment. Politics & Gender 11 (4): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, Kelly, Kira Sanbonmatsu, Susan J. Carroll, Debbie Walsh, and Catherine Wineinger. 2017. Representation Matters: Women in the U.S. Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, Debra. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, Debra L., Susan J. Carroll, Ruth B. Mandel, Ronnee Schreiber, and Katherine E. Kleeman. 1995. Voices, Views, Votes: The Impact of Women in the 103rd Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, Debra L., and Susan J. Carroll. 1991. Reshaping the Agenda: Women in State Legislatures. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fiber, Pamela, and Richard Fox. 2005. A Tougher Road for Women? Assessing the Role of Gender in Congressional Elections. In Gender and American Politics, 2nd ed., ed. Sue Tolleson-Rinehart and Jyl Josephson, 64–81. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Richard L. 1997. Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Richard L. 2014. Congressional Elections: Women’s Candidacies and the Road to Gender Parity. In Gender and Elections, 3rd ed., ed. Susan J. Carroll and Richard L. Fox, 190–210. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraga, Luis Ricardo, Lind Lopez, Valeri Martinez-Ebers, and Ricardo Ramirez. 2006. Gender and Ethnicity: Patterns of Electoral Success and Legislative Advocacy among Latina and Latino State Officials in Four States. Journal of Women Politics & Policy 28 (3–4): 121–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrity, Jessica C., Tracy Osborn, and Jeanette Morehouse Mendez. 2007. Women and Representation: A Different View of the District? Politics & Gender 3 (2): 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government Printing Office (GPO). 1900. Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1899. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Anna L. 1998. Votes Without Leverage: Women in American Electoral Politics, 1920–1970. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. 2007. A Woman’s Work Is Never Done? Political Research Quarterly 60 (2): 230–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeydel, A., and A.J. Taylor. 2003. Are Women Legislators Less Effective? Evidence from the US House in the 103rd–105th Congress. Political Research Quarterly 56 (1): 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates. American Political Science Review 88 (3): 560–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, Anne M., Alice H. Eagly, Abigail A. Mitchell, and Tiina Ristikari. 2011. Are Leader Stereotypes Masculine? Psychological Bulletin 137 (4): 616–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. Politics of Presence? Congresswomen and Symbolic Representation. Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, Jennifer, and Richard L. Fox. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Political Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, Jennifer, and Richard L. Fox. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, Jennifer, and Richard L. Fox. 2013. Girls Just Wanna Not Run: The Gender Gap in Young Americans’ Political Ambition. Washington, DC: Women & Politics Institute, American University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung. 2015. The Consequences of Explicit and Implicit Gender Attitudes and Candidate Quality in the Calculations of Voters. Political Behavior 37 (2): 357–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, Tracy, and Jeanette Morehouse Mendez. 2010. Speaking as Women: Women and Floor Speeches in the Senate. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 31 (1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Kathryn, and Logan Dancey. 2011. Elevating Women’s Voices in Congress: Speech Participation in the House of Representatives. Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 910–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reingold, Beth. 2000. Representing Women. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, Rene R., and Robert D. Wrinkle. 2011. Gender, Ethnicity, and Support for Bilingual Education: Will Just Any Woman or Latino Do? A Contingent ‘No’. Policy Studies Journal 39 (2): 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1998. When Women Lead. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2003. Gender-Related Political Knowledge and the Descriptive Representation of Women. Political Behavior 25 (4): 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, Richard, Jody Newman, and Melissa Voorhees Leighton. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in American Elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shames, Shauna L. 2017. Out of the Running: Why Millennials Reject Political Careers and Why It Matters. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Robert. 1998. The Congressional Black Caucus. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smooth, Wendy. 2011. Standing for Women? Which Women? The Substantive Representation of Women’s Interests and the Research Imperative of Intersectionality. Politics & Gender 7 (3): 436–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smooth, Wendy. 2014. African American Women and Electoral Politics: Translating Voting Power into Office-holding. In Gender and Elections, 3rd ed., ed. Susan J. Carroll and Richard L. Fox, 167–189. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swers, Michele L. 2013. Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Terborg-Penn, Rosalyn. 1995. African American Women and the Woman Suffrage Movement. In One Woman One Vote, ed. Margaret Spruill Wheeler, 135–154. Troutdale: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Susan. 2010. Women in State Legislatures. In Gender and Women’s Leaders, ed. Karen O’Connor, 112–122. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner, Carole Jean, and Kay Lehman Schlozman. 1986. Candidate Gender and Congressional Campaign Receipts. Journal of Politics 48: 30–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volden, Craig, Alan E. Wiseman, and Dana E. Wittmer. 2013. Why Are Women More Effective Members of Congress? American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 326–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volden, Craig, and Alan E. Wiseman. 2017. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Senate. Chicago: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2002. Enlarging Representation: Women Bringing Marginalized Perspectives to Floor Debate in the House of Representatives. In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Cindy Simon Rosenthal, 370–396. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, Timothy, and Kenneth R. Mayer. 2007. Public Election Funding, Competition, and Candidate Gender. PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (4): 661–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, Allen, and John Theilman. 1986. Women, Blacks, and PAC Discrimination. Social Science Quarterly 67: 283–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolbrecht, Christina. 2002. Female Legislators and the Women’s Rights Agenda: From Feminine Mystique to Feminist Era. In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Cindy Simon Rosenthal, 179–197. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolbrecht, Christina, and David E. Campbell. 2017. Role Models Revisited: Youth, Novelty, and the Impact of Female Candidates. Politics, Groups, and Identities 5 (3): 418–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, USA

    Kelly Dittmar

  2. Center for American Women and Politics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

    Kelly Dittmar

Authors
  1. Kelly Dittmar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly Dittmar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Susan Franceschet

  2. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

    Mona Lena Krook

  3. McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Netina Tan

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dittmar, K. (2019). United States: Gendered Institutions, Processes, and Outcomes. In: Franceschet, S., Krook, M.L., Tan, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Women’s Political Rights. Gender and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59074-9_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation