Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Izabela Grabowska
  • Michał P. Garapich
  • Ewa Jaźwińska
  • Agnieszka Radziwinowiczówna
Chapter
Part of the Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship book series (MDC)

Abstract

In the concluding chapter we bring together various threads of the arguments to point to the real, intense and very important relationship between migration and social change in the countries of origin as well as localities of destination (although on a different scale). We stress that the attention to small-scale, mundane, banal and everyday actions of migrant agents helps to see the micro social changes in question or the lack thereof. By bringing forward the theoretical framework described in the early chapters we reaffirm the core argument of the book, which is the centrality of human agency in incorporating social change in transnational and translocal contexts.

Keywords

Destination Country Return Migrant Sport Club Informal Learning Civic Participation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Glick Schiller, N. (2005). Transnational social fields and imperialism: Bringing a theory of power to Transnational Studies’. Anthropological Theory, 5(4), 439–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Grabowska, I. (2016). Movers and stayers: Social mobility, migration and skills. Frankfurt Am Main: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Howaldt, J., Kopp, R., & Schwarz, M. (2015). On the theory of social innovations: Tarde’s neglected contribution to the development of a sociological innovation theory. Beltz Juventa: Weinheim.Google Scholar
  4. Levitt, P. (1998). Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. The International Migration Review, 32(4), 926–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Levitt, P. (2001). The transnational villagers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. O’Reilly, K. (2012). International migration and social theory. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Osrecki, F. (2014). . Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  8. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Izabela Grabowska
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michał P. Garapich
    • 3
  • Ewa Jaźwińska
    • 2
  • Agnieszka Radziwinowiczówna
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Social Sciences and HumanitiesWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Centre of Migration ResearchUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Social SciencesUniversity of RoehamptonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations