Advertisement

Observing, Acquiring, Resisting: Migrants’ Agency in the Web of Social Remittances

  • Izabela Grabowska
  • Michał P. Garapich
  • Ewa Jaźwińska
  • Agnieszka Radziwinowiczówna
Chapter
Part of the Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship book series (MDC)

Abstract

The process of social remitting is complex, multilayered and involves numerous social actors that at each stage face several choices of action. By definition, the process of socially remitted ideas, codes of behaviour and practices starts with the migrants themselves and their social context in the destination country. This chapter traces in detail what happens when migrants are exposed to new settings, how they make sense of this logic of novelty and unfamiliarity, what they choose as beneficial and potentially valuable or not, once they get to know the details of British social life. Faithful to our understanding of social remittances as ultimately a process where individual agency is the dominant determinant, we follow the routes, ideas, practices and values that travel within the transnational social field between Britain and various localities in Poland.

Keywords

Social Control Destination Country British Society Migration Experience Cultural Meaning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Basch, L., Glick Schiller, N., & Szanton Blanc, C. (1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states. Langhorne, PA: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  2. Burrell, K. (2008). Time matters: Temporal contexts of Polish transnationalism. In J. Eade & M. P. Smith (Eds.), Transnational ties: Cities, migrations, and identities. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Burrell, K. (Ed.). (2009). Polish migration to the UK in the ‘New’ European Union: After 2004. Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Datta, A. (2009). “This is special humour”: Visual narratives of Polish masculinities on London’s building sites. In K. Burrell (Ed.), Polish migration to the UK in the ‘New’ European Union: After 2004 (pp. 189–210). Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. Driver, S., & Garapich, M. P. (2012). “Everyone for themselves”? Non-national EU citizens from Eastern and Central Europe and the 2012 London elections. Department of Social Sciences University of Roehampton, London. Accessed January 20, 2016, form http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/materials/documents/epop/papers/DriverGarapichEPOP2012.pdf
  6. Eade, J., Drinkwater, S., & Garapich, M. P. (2006). Class and ethnicity – Polish migrants in London. Economic and social research council end of award report RES-000-22-1294 ESRC. London: University of Surrey. Accessed November 11, 2015, from http://www.surrey.ac.uk/cronem/files/POLISH_FINAL_RESEARCH_REPORT_WEB.pdf
  7. Galasinska, A., & Kozlowska, O. (2009). Discourses of “normal life” among post-accession migrants from Poland to Britain. In K. Burrell (Ed.), Polish migration to the UK in the ‘New’ European Union: After 2004 (pp. 87–105). Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Garapich, M. P. (2013). Polska kultura migracyjna po 2004 roku – miedzy zmiana a tradycja. In M. Lesinska & M. Okolski (Eds.), Wspolczesne polskie migracje: Strategie – skutki spoleczne – reakcja panstwa (pp. 17–34). Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego: Warszawa.Google Scholar
  9. Gardner, K. (1993). Desh-Bidesh: Sylheti Images of Home and Away. Man, 28(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Golbert, R. (2001). Transnational orientations from home: Constructions of Israel and transnational space among Ukrainian Jewish youth. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(4), 713–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guarnizo, L. E. (1997). The emergence of a transnational social formation and the mirage of return migration among dominican transmigrants. Identities, 4(2), 281–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kempny, M. (2010). Polish migrants in Belfast: Border crossing and identity construction. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  13. Krotofil, J. (2011). “If I am to be a Muslim, I have to be a good one”. Polish migrant women embracing Islam and reconstructing identity in dialogue with self and others. In K. Gorak-Sosnowska (Ed.), Muslims in Poland and Eastern Europe: Widening the European Discourse on Islam. Warszawa: University of Warsaw, Faculty of Oriental Studies.Google Scholar
  14. Levitt, P. (2009). Roots and routes: Understanding the lives of the second generation transnationally. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(7), 1225–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller, D. (2008). The comfort of things. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. Nowicka, M. (2014). Migrating skills, skilled migrants and migration skills: The influence of contexts on the validation of migrants’ skills. Migration Letters, 11(2), 171–186.Google Scholar
  17. Rabikowska, M. (2010). Preface to negotiation of normality and identity among migrants from Eastern Europe to the United Kingdom after 2004. Social Identities: Special Issue. Edited by M. Rabikowska, 16(3), pp. 285–296.Google Scholar
  18. Ryan, L. (2010). Becoming Polish in London: Negotiating ethnicity through migration. Social Identities: Special Issue. Edited by M. Rabikowska, 16(3), pp. 359–376.Google Scholar
  19. Ryan, L., & D’Angelo, A. (2011). Sites of Socialisation – Polish Parents and Children in London Schools. Studia Migracyjne – Przeglad Polonijny, XXXVII(1), 237–258.Google Scholar
  20. Siara, B. (2013). The construction of gender in the migration space: Polish Women in the UK. GENDER – Zeitschrift fur Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft, 5(1), 105–120.Google Scholar
  21. Temple, B. (2011). Influences on integration: Exploring Polish people’s views of other ethnic communities. Studia Migracyjne – Przeglad Polonijny, XXXVII(1), 97–110.Google Scholar
  22. Vertovec, S. (2004). Migrant transnationalism and styles of transformation. International Migration Review, 38(3), 970–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vertovec, S. (2007). New complexities of cohesion in Britain: Super-diversity, transnationalism and civil-integration. Wetherby: Commission on Integration & Cohesion. Accessed January 21, 2016, from http://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/files/Publications/Reports/Vertovec%20-%20new_complexities_of_cohesion_in_britain.pdf
  24. White, A. (2011a). Polish families and migration since EU accession. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  25. White, A. (2011b). The mobility of Polish families in the west of England: Translocalism and attitudes to return. Studia Migracyjne – Przeglad Polonijny, XXXVII(1), 11–32.Google Scholar
  26. Zubrzycki, G. (2006). The crosses of Auschwitz nationalism and religion in post-communist Poland. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Izabela Grabowska
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michał P. Garapich
    • 3
  • Ewa Jaźwińska
    • 2
  • Agnieszka Radziwinowiczówna
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Social Sciences and HumanitiesWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Centre of Migration ResearchUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Social SciencesUniversity of RoehamptonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations