Skip to main content

Teaching and Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neuroethics in Higher Education Policy

Abstract

Approaches to course delivery tend to rest on the assumption that the most effective ways to deliver courses exist in lectures and written essays or examination. Despite increasing empirical evidence in favor of instruction innovations such as flipped classrooms and variation in assignments, many faculty resist such innovations on the grounds of tradition, biases, or their own neurological differences. This chapter presents these dynamics and strength-based approaches to instruction more attuned to neuroethical concerns.

Shawna finds a seat in the crowded, stadium style auditorium of her anthropology class, on all of the desks lays a ten-page syllabi. Internally, she debates if she even likes anthropology. On the third page, she sees a semester-long assignment to be done on her own and her heart starts to pound. She has never done well on assignments similar to this in the past. The professor walks in, introduces herself, and lets the class of 73 know that it is a lecture-based course and exhaustive notes will be required to pass any one of the five essay exams. Shawna’s palms start to sweat because her note taking skills have always been lacking. Her leg nervously shakes as she considers that she learns better when she can engage in open dialogue with her peers and professors. A knot builds in her stomach. She contemplates how much grief she would suffer from her father over withdrawing from yet another anthropology course.

Down the hall, Travis sits in a sociology course. Where Travis grew up, the population was heavily influenced by Native American culture. There were more than a dozen tribes, and seven reservations in his state; here, there are two tribes and he feels like the expert on the culture in his college courses. He is exasperated that the US history class he took last semester overlooked the colonial impact on the Native Americans during westward expansion. He feels his peers are just as ignorant as the professors, especially when they ask if he is “from here.” Travis absorbs information best in group settings, and most of the courses he has taken so far require him to work alone. He rolls his eyes as he looks over the syllabus for this course; it is the same as the others. He recognizes at this point in his academic career that he retains information from observations and demonstrations, like his required science labs. This class is lecture-based, has three papers, tons of reading, and is laden with quizzes—Travis knows this is going to be a long semester.—Jubilee Belle Lawhead

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • American Association of University Professors. 2015. Policy Documents and Reports, 91–93. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, Thomas. 2012. Neurodiversity in the Classroom: Strength-Based Strategies to Help Students with Special Needs Succeed in School and Life. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, Helen, and Rhona Sharpe. 2013. Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st Century Learning. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, Shelley H., and Alan S. Waterman. 2014. Studying Service-Learning: Innovations in Education Research Methodology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigognini, Maria Elisabetta, Maria Chiara Pettenati, and Palitha Edirisingha. 2010. Personal knowledge management skills in web 2.0-based learning. In Web 2.0-Based E-Learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching, ed. M.J.W. Lee and C. McLoughlin, 109–127. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLozier, Sarah J., and Matthew G. Rhodes. 2016. Flipped classrooms: a review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drane, D., M. Micari, and G. Light. 2014. Students as teachers: effectiveness of a peer-led STEM learning programme over 10 years. Educational Research and Evaluation 20(3): 210–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faciane, Ron. 2015. Standardization: the fast track to a qualified workforce. Business and Industry Connection Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, Duncan. 2013. Direct participation and the quality of work. Human Relations 66(4): 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, Robert K. 1977. Servant Leadership. New York: Paulist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Denise. Can blogging make a difference? Campus Technology. 1/21/2011. https://campustechnology.com/articles/2011/01/12/can-blogging-make-a-difference.aspx.

  • Hattie, John, and Gregory C.R. Yates. 2013. Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, Barry S., and Casey J. Roulette. 2016. Teaching in hunter-gather infancy. Royal Society of Open Science 3(1): 150403. doi:10.1098/rsos.150403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Jones, Paul A. 2014. Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15(12): 817–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Carolyn, Rachel Steinhorn, Blair Davis, Sara Beckrest, Elizabeth Boyd, and Kelly Cashen. 2012. University-based service learning: relating mentoring experiences to issues of poverty. Journal of College Student Development 53(6): 767–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsdottir, I.H., A. Nordlund, S. Ellbin, T. Ljung, K. Glise, P. Währborg, and A. Wallin. 2013. Cognitive impairment in patients with stress-related exhaustion. Stress 16(2): 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, James M., Kathleen L.H. Wong, John Wills Hung, Li Yu Yu, and Patricia L. Pullen. 1991. What puts pupils at risk? An analysis of classroom teachers’ judgments of pupils’ behavior. Remedial and Special Education 12(5): 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitsantas, Anastasia, and Nada Dabbagh. 2011. The role of Web 2.0 technologies in self‐regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2011(126): 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, Agnes. 2012. How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning? The Internet and Higher Education 15(4): 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Scott E., and Jennifer E. Lewis. 2005. Departing from lectures: an evaluation of a peer-led guided inquiry alternative. Journal of Chemical Education 82(1): 135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotz-Sisitka, Heila, Arjen E.J. Wals, David Kronlid, and Dylan McGarry. 2015. Transformative, transgressive social learning: rethinking higher education pedagogy in times of systemic global dysfunction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 16: 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Harvey C. 2014. A Student’s Guide to Political Philosophy. New York: Open Road Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, Jacqueline E., Paul J. White, Julia Khanova, and Elizabeth Yuriev. 2016. Flipped classroom implementation: a case report of two higher education institutions in the United States and Australia. Computers in the Schools 33(1): 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, Michelle, Jacqueline M. Van Wyk, Edith M. Peters-Futre, and Susan B. Higgins-Opitz. 2006. The small group in problem-based learning: more than a cognitive ‘learning’ experience for first-year medical students in a diverse population. Medical Teacher 28(4): e94–e103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra, Joya, Jennifer Hickes Lundquist, and Abby Templer. 2012. Gender, work time, and care responsibilities among faculty. Sociological Forum 27(2): 300–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Frank, and Jamie E. Scurry. 2015. Higher education and the digital rapids. International Higher Education 26: 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty, Jacqueline, and Craig Phillips. 2015. The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education 25: 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R.S. 1966. Ethics and Education. New York: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Michael, and Mary Ryan. 2015. Teaching Reflective Learning in Higher Education. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh, Mohammad, Ard W. Lazonder, and Ton De Jong. 2005. Effects of within-class ability grouping on social interaction, achievement, and motivation. Instructional Science 33(2): 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltmarsh, John, Emily M. Janke, and Patti H. Clayton. 2015. Transforming higher education through and for democratic civic engagement: a model for change. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 22(1): 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, Edward, and Jordana Maisel. 2012. Universal Design: Creating Inclusive Environments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tess, Paul A. 2013. The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)—A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior 29(5): A60–A68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Steven C. 2015. No child left behind goes to college. Academe 101(5): 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorio, Patrick L., and Feifei Ye. 2012. A meta-analysis on the effects of service-learning on the social, personal, and cognitive outcomes of learning. Academy of Management Learning and Education 11(1): 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baker, D.L., Leonard, B. (2017). Teaching and Learning. In: Neuroethics in Higher Education Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59020-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics