Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From News to Comment: Tracing Text Trajectories in News Reporting about the Amanda Knox Trial

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transmedia Crime Stories

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture ((PSCMC))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the ways that newspaper producers and readers represented the Italian justice system and its criminal procedure through the various phases of Amanda Knox’s arrest, trial, conviction, acquittal, and retrial (in absentia). Specifically, it considers how news readers textually interacted with and reacted to articles dealing with the case through the online comment function. The work aims to demonstrate how text producers (the media and text commenters) selectively recontextualise and possibly transform elements of the case based on previous versions recounted by the media. A quantitative analysis exploits tools from Corpus Linguistics in order to determine the specific legal lexical representations in a number of different corpora of both newspaper articles and comments from different periods of the case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amodio, E. (2004). The accusatorial system lost and regained: Reforming criminal procedure in Italy. American Journal of Comparative Law, 53, 489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annunziato, S. (2011). The Amanda Knox case: The representation of Italy in American media coverage. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 31(1), 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Associated Press (2010). Amanda Knox appeal opens in Italy. The Guardian, 24 November. Retrieved 27 September 2015 from http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/nov/24/amanda-knox-appeal-opens-italy

  • Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (2012). Acceptable bias? Using Corpus Linguistics methods with Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(3), 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., Hardy, A., & McEnery, T. (2006). A glossary of Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthel, M. (2015). Newspapers: Fact sheet. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 29 April. Retrieved 15 September 2015 from http://www.journalism.org/2015/04/29/newspapers-fact-sheet/

  • Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, V. (2010). Specification in legislative writing: Accessibility, transparency, power and control. In M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 37–50). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, M. S. (2013). Representation of foreign justice in the media: The Amanda Knox case. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 7(1), 33–50. Retrieved 23 September 2015 from http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/journals/cadaad/wp-content/ uploads /2015/04/Volume-7_Boyd.pdf

  • Boyd, M. S. (2014). Participation and recontextualization in new media: Political discourse analysis and YouTube. In B. Kaal, I. Maks, & A. van Elfrinkhof (Eds.), From text to political position: Text analysis across disciplines (pp. 243–296). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, M. S., & Walbaum Robinson, I. A. (2015). Text commenting in mediatised legal discourse: Evaluating reader understanding of (International) Criminal Law. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse, 5(1), 1–37 Retrieved 20 September 2016 from http://www.ijlld.com/2015-index/.

  • Cao, D. (2007). Translating law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catenaccio, P., Cotter, C., De Smedt, M., Garzone, G., Jacobs, G., Macgilchrist, F., et al. (2011). Towards a linguistics of news production. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(7), 1843–1852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill, J. (2002). “Just one more time”: Aspects of intertextuality in the trials of O.J. Simpson. In J. Cotterill (Ed.), Language in the legal process (pp. 147–161). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elrich, S. (2012). Text trajectories, legal discourse and gendered inequalities. Applied Linguistics Review, 3(1), 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London/New York: E. Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Introduction to discourse studies (pp. 258–284). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, A., & Johansson, M. (2008). Hybridities in political media discourse. Politics and Culture, 4. Retrieved 15 February 2010 from http://aspen.conncoll.edu/politicsandculture/ adpage.html

  • Greer, C. (2007). News media, victims and crime. In P. Davies, P. Francis, & C. Greer (Eds.), Victims, crime and society (pp. 20–49). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, M. (2014). Reading digital news: Participation roles, activities, and positionings. Journal of Pragmatics, 72(October), 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., et al. (2014). The Sketch engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1(1), 7–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koller, V. (2008). Identity, image, impression: Corporate self-promotion and public reactions. In R. Wodak & V. Koller (Eds.), Handbook of communication in the public sphere (pp. 155–180). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landert, D., & Jucker, A. H. (2011). Private and public in mass media communication: From letters to the editor to online commentaries. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(5), 1422–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, P. (2007). Searching for the “You” in “YouTube”: An analysis of online response ability. In Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, pp. 36–50. Retrieved 11 June 2011 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-8918.2007.tb00061.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I., & Kieran, K. (2009). New media: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loke, J. (2013). Readers’ debate a local murder trial: ‘Race’ in the online public sphere. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(1), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, S. (2006). Media and language: Overview. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 7, pp. 597–602). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mirabella, J. G. (2012). Scales of justice: Assessing Italian criminal procedure through the Amanda Knox trial. Boston University International Law Journal, 30, 229–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povoledo, E. (2015). Amanda Knox acquitted of 2007 murder by Italy’s highest court. The New York Times, 27 March. Retrieved 27 September 2015 from http://www.nytimes.com/ 2015/03/28/world/europe/amanda-knox-trial.html?_r=0

  • Richardson, J. (2007). Analysing newspapers: An approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., & Stanyer, J. (2011). Reader opinion in the digital age: Tabloid and broadsheet newspaper websites and the exercise of political voice. Journalism, 12(8), 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarcevic, S. (1997). New approach to legal translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savoie, H. (2009). John McCain get barackroll’d: Authorship, culture and community on YouTube. YouTube and the 2008 Election Cycle in the United States. University of Massachusetts Amherst: ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst, pp. 177–188. Retrieved 15 November 2012 from http://scholarworks.umass.edu/jitpc2009/1

  • Scott, M. (2008). Oxford Wordsmith Tools Version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and Corpus Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. (2012). Questions and answers on how The Times handles online comments from readers. The New York Times, 15 October. Retrieved 1 September 2015 from http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/15/questions-and-answers-on-how-the-times-handles-online-comments-from-readers/?_r=0

  • Tannen, D., & Wallat, C. (1999). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 346–366). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian (2008). Comment is free: About us. The Guardian, 3 June. Retrieved 10 October 2015 from http://www.theguardian.com/help/2008/jun/03/1

  • The Guardian (2009). Community standards and participation guidelines. The Guardian, 7 May. Retrieved 27 September 2015 from http://www.theguardian.com/community-standards

  • The New York Times (2015). What kind of comments are you looking for. The New York Times, no date. Retrieved 27 September 2015 from http://www.nytimes.com/content/help/site/ usercontent/ usercontent.html

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, P. (2014). Discussions in the comments section: Factors influencing participation and interactivity in online newspapers’ reader comments. New Media & Society, 16(6), 941–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Chilton, P. A. (2007). A new agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, methodology, and interdisciplinarity. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegele, M., Breiner, T., & Quiring, O. (2014). What creates interactivity in online news discussions? An exploratory analysis of discussion factors in user comments on news items. Journal of Communication, 64, 1111–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rome Tre University, Rome, Italy

    Michael S. Boyd

Authors
  1. Michael S. Boyd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Media and Communication, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

    Lieve Gies

  2. University of Udine, Montelupo Fidrentino, Italy

    Maria Bortoluzzi

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boyd, M.S. (2016). From News to Comment: Tracing Text Trajectories in News Reporting about the Amanda Knox Trial. In: Gies, L., Bortoluzzi, M. (eds) Transmedia Crime Stories. Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59004-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation