Abstract
The documents examined in this chapter are investigation reports produced by the IPCC into cases of DAPC. The chapter evaluates similarities and differences between the IPCC and coronial system in how they construct accountability in terms of processes used and findings produced. The relationality of independence has been established, as was the fact that this linked to other relational concepts such as accountability and transparency. The latter issue has been repeatedly criticised by families of those who have died, by campaign groups and most recently by the Home Office (2015) in its triennial review of the IPCC. This is borne out in my research. Of the narrative verdicts considered in the previous chapter, approximately one-third were available as investigation reports through the IPCC web portal. After a Freedom of Information request it became apparent that one-third of the deaths were not investigated by the IPCC but by PSDs within the police. The final third were eventually made available to me in a redacted form. Clearly this brings into question the openness and transparency of IPCC processes. It also brings into question how accountable the IPCC are in investigating cases of DAPC, not least because it did not investigate a third of the deaths in the dataset. Finally, it brings into question the IPCC role in promoting public confidence in the police: if the investigations into the majority of these deaths were not available, this would suggest a system of police regulation that was at best disorganised and at worst had something to hide. This is far from ideal when its goal is to promote public trust in policing throughout England and Wales. A more general point is to consider the issues listed above in questioning the cognitive and procedural legitimacy of the IPCC in terms of its relevance to society, police and the state. Evidently these concepts exist in both symbolic and practical form, with the discussion above demonstrating that the practical forms of openness and transparency are questionable in the context of the IPCC investigating cases of DAPC.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The prosecutions in the Ian Tomlinson and Sean Rigg cases, for example, occurred as a result of evidence uncovered during inquests.
References
ACPO. (2006). Guidance on the safer detention and handling of persons in police custody. Available at: http://www.nacro.org.uk/data/files/nacro-2006021400-469.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2013.
ACPO. (2012). Guidance on the safer detention and handling of persons in police custody (2nd ed.). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/117555/safer-detention-guidance-2012.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2014.
Aiken, F., Duxbury, J., Dale, C., & Harbison, I. (2011). Review of the medical theories and research relating to restraint deaths. Available at: http://iapdeathsincustody.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Caring-Solutions-UK-Ltd-Review-of-Medical-Theories-of-Restraint-Deaths.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2013.
BBC News. (2013, May 17). Radio 4 Today programme. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22554051. Accessed 17 May 2013.
Black, J. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation and Governance, 2(2), 137–164.
Bullock, K., & Johnson, P. (2012). The impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on policing in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology, 52(3), 630–650.
Casale, S., Corfe, M., & Lewis, J. (2013). Report of the independent external review of the IPCC investigation into the death of Sean Rigg. Available at: http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/news/Pages/pr_170513_Riggreview.aspx. Accessed 21 May 2013.
Chan, J., & Dixon, D. (2007). The politics of police reform: Ten years after the Royal Commission into the New South Wales Police Service. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 7(4), 443–468.
Channel 4. (2013). Dispatches: ‘The police’s dirty secret.’ Screened 24 June 2013.
Chapman, C. (2014). Improving police integrity: Reforming the police complaints and disciplinary systems. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/385900/45363_Cm_8976_Press.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2015.
Chief Coroner’s Office. (2013). The Chief Coroner’s guide to the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. Available at: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/coroners/guidance/chief-coroners-guide-to-act-sept2013.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2013.
Coles, D., & Shaw, H. (2012). Learning from death in custody inquests: A new framework for action and accountability. London: Russell Press.
Dodd, V. (2015). Police force could lose 22,000 jobs under new spending cuts. The Guardian. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/31/police-force-new-spending-cuts-22000-jobs. Accessed 8 Oct 2015.
Downham, G., & Lingham, R. (2009). Learning lessons: Using inquiries for change. Journal of Mental Health Law, 18(1), 57–69.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
Gilsinan, J. (2012). The numbers dilemma: The chimera of modern police accountability systems. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 32, 93–108.
Gov.UK. (2015). Home Secretary announces chair for deaths in custody review. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/home-secretary-announces-chair-for-deaths-in-custody-review. Accessed 25 Oct 2015.
Gunnarson, B.-L., Linell, P., & Nordberg, B. (Eds.). (1997). The construction of professional discourse. Harlow: Longman.
Home Office. (2015). Improving police integrity: Reforming the police complaints and disciplinary systems. London: HMSO.
House of Commons Home Affairs Committee. (2010). The work of the independent police complaints commission. London: TSO.
House of Commons Home Affairs Committee. (2013). Independent police complaints commission. London: TSO.
Inquest. (2015). Independent review into deaths and serious incidents in custody must be effective and lead to real change. Available at: http://www.inquest.org.uk/media/pr/independent-review-into-deaths-serious-incidents-in-custody-must-be-effective-and-lead-to-real-change. Accessed 31 July 2015.
IPCC. (2007). Memorandum of understanding between the coroners’ society of England and Wales and the IPCC. Available at: www.ipcc.gov.uk/Documents/guidelines reports/mou.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2013.
IPCC. (2012). IPCC Independent investigation into the death of Sean Rigg whilst in the custody of Brixton police. Available at: http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/en/Pages/inv_reports_london_se_region.aspx. Accessed 21 May 2013.
IPCC. (2014a). Review of the IPCC’s work in investigating deaths: Final report. Available at: http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Documents/deaths_review/Review_of_the_IPCCs_work_in_investigating_deaths_2014.pdf. Accessed 17 Mar 2014.
IPCC. (2014b). Becoming the new IPCC: IPCC Corporate plan 2014/17. Available at: https://www.ipcc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/publications/corporate_plan_2014-17.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec 2015.
Kutcher, S., Bowes, M., Sanfold, F., Teehan, M., Ayer, S., Ross, J., Smith, L., & Thornhill, S. (2009). Report of the panel of mental health and medical experts review of ED. Available at: http://novascotia.ca/just/Public_Safety/_docs/Excited%20Delirium%20Report.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2013.
Marsh, D., Duque, L., Pablo, J., Qin, Y., Adi, N., Hearn, W., Hyma, B., Karch, S., Druid, H., & Wetli, C. (2009). Brain biomarkers for identifying excited delirium as a cause of sudden death. Forensic Science International, 190(3), 13–19.
Menaker, J., Farcy, D., Boswell, S., Stein, D., Dutton, R., Hess, J., & Scalea, T. (2011). Cocaine-induced agitated delirium with associated hyperthermia: A case report. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 41(3), 49–53.
Razak, R. (2012). G20 death pathologist Dr Freddy Patel is struck off. London Evening Standard. 23 Aug 2012.
Reiner, R. (1991). Multiple realities, divided worlds—Chief constables perspectives on the police complaints system. In A. J. Goldsmith (Ed.), Complaints against the police: The trend to external review (pp. 211–231). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Reiner, R. (2000). The politics of the police (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Savage, S. (2007a). Give and take: The bifurcation of police reform in Britain. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(3), 313–334.
Savage, S. (2007b). Police reform: Forces for change. Oxford: OUP.
Savage, S. (2013a). Thinking independence: Calling the police to account through the independent investigation of police complaints. British Journal of Criminology, 53(1), 94–112.
Savage, S. (2013b). Seeking ‘civilianness’: Police complaints and the civilian control model of oversight. British Journal of Criminology, 53(5), 886–904.
Savage, S., & Charman, S. (2001). The Bobby Lobby: Police associations and the policy process. In M. Ryan, S. Savage, & D. Wall (Eds.), Policy networks in criminal justice (pp. 24–54). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Shane, J. (2013). Learning from error in policing: A case study in organisational accident theory. Heidelberg: Springer.
Smith, G. (2009). Why don’t more people complain against the police? European Journal of Criminology, 6(3), 249–266.
Terpstra, J., & Trommel, W. (2009). Police, managerialisation and presentational strategies. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 32(1), 128–143.
Thomas, L., Straw, A., & Friedman, D. (2008). Inquests: A practitioner’s guide (2nd ed.). London: Legal Action Group.
Wadham, J. (2004). Investigations into deaths in police custody and the independent police complaints commission. European Human Rights Law Review, 4, 353–361.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baker, D. (2016). IPCC: Fit for Purpose?. In: Deaths After Police Contact. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58967-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58967-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58966-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58967-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)