Abstract
This chapter further explores the links between de-traditionalisation and re-traditionalisation. It does so by examining the survival of marriage in Britain and the desire of many young women to ‘choose’ tradition in marrying and becoming a wife. In so doing, the chapter, using insights from critical institutionalism, mounts a critique of contemporary attempts to update individualisation theory and details how tradition is reworked and reproduced in dealing with social change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Expressed as persons marrying per 1000 unmarried persons over 16.
- 2.
2011 estimate assuming 2010 divorce and mortality rates throughout the duration of marriage.
- 3.
Although this construction of the self is also ‘the unreflexive product of a particular cultural tradition, namely Western modernity’ (Adams 2003: 234).
References
Adams, M. (2003). The reflexive self and culture: A critique. British Journal of Sociology, 54(2), 221–238.
Adkins, L. (1995). Gendered work; sexuality, gender and labour markets. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Agerholm, H. (2017) Theresa May says there are ‘boy jobs and girl jobs’ in the home. The Independent (online). Accessed at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-philip-may-husband-boy-jobs-girls-one-show-take-bins-out-bbc-prime-minister-marriage-a7727481.html. Accessed 12 June 2017.
Barlow, A., Duncan, S., James, G., & Park, A. (2005). Cohabitation, marriage and the law: Social change and legal reform in the 21st century. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualisation. London: Sage.
Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Carter, J. (2010). Why marry? Young women talk about relationships, marriage, and love. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of York.
Carter, J. (2012). What is commitment? Women’s accounts of intimate attachment. Families, Relationships and Societies, 1(2), 137–153.
Charles, N., Davies, C., & Harrris, C. (2008). Families in transition: Social change, family formation and kin relationships. Bristol: Policy Press.
Chen, B., & Mac an Ghaill, M. (2015). Exploring detraditionalization through gender reflexivity in late modernity: The negotiation of family/filial responsibilities among Taiwanese (younger) professional men. Families, Relationships and Societies, 4(3), 449–464.
Cherlin, A. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848–861.
Cleaver, F. (2012). Development as bricolage. London: Earthscan.
Cokely, C. (2005). “Someday my prince will come”: Disney, the heterosexual imaginary and animated film. In C. Ingraham (Ed.), Thinking straight: The power, the promise, and the paradox of heterosexuality (pp. 167–182). New York: Routledge.
Cronin, A.M. (2015). Domestic friends’: Women’s friendships, motherhood and inclusive intimacy. The Sociological Review, 63(3), 662–679.
Dawson, M. (2012). Reviewing the critique of individualization: The disembedded and embedded theses. Acta Sociologica, 55(4), 305–319.
de Waal, A. (2008). Second thoughts on the family. London: CIVITAS.
Douglas, M. (1987). How institutions think. London: Routledge.
Duncan, S., & Phillips, M. (2008). New families? Tradition and change in modern relationships. In A. Park, J. Curtice, K. Thomson, M. Phillips, M. Johnson, & E. Clery (Eds.), British social attitudes: The 24th report (pp. 1–28). London: Sage.
Eldén, S. (2012). Scripts for the ‘good couple’: Individualization and the reproduction of gender inequality. Acta Sociologica, 55(1), 3–18.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (pp. 56–109). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gilding, M. (2010). Reflexivity over and above convention: The new orthodoxy in the sociology of personal life, formerly sociology of the family. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(4), 757–777.
Gross, N. (2005). The detraditionalization of intimacy reconsidered. Sociological Theory, 23(3), 286–311.
Hobsbawm, E. (1983). Introduction: Inventing traditions. In E. Hobsbawm & T. Ranger (Eds.), The invention of tradition (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingraham, C. (1999). White weddings: Romancing heterosexuality in popular culture. London: Routledge.
Jeff, D. (2013). UK cohabitation and marriage survey. Modern Marriage: Myths, Realities and Prospects. Available at http://www.marriagefoundation.org.uk/. Accessed 5 June 17.
Langhamer, C. (2007). Love and courtship in mid-twentieth century England. The Historical Journal, 50(1), 173–196.
Lauer, S., & Yodanis, C. (2010). The deinstitutionalization of marriage revisited: A new institutional approach to marriage. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(1), 58–72.
Massey, D., Quintas, P., & Wield, D. (1992). High tech fantasies; science parks in society, science and space. London/New York: Routledge.
McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. London: Sage.
ONS. (2013). Divorces in England and Wales: 2013. Statistical bulletins.
ONS. (2016). Marriages in England and Wales. Statistical bulletins.
Otnes, C., & Pleck, E. H. (2003). Cinderella dreams: The allure of the lavish wedding. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pierce, R. (1963). Marriage in the fifties. The Sociological Review, 11(2), 215–240.
Pleasance, P., & Balmer, N. J. (2012). Ignorance in bliss: Modeling knowledge of rights in marriage and cohabitation. Law & Society Review, 46(2), 297–333.
Shumway, D. (2003). Modern love: Romance, intimacy, and the marriage crisis. New York: New York Press.
Smart, C., & Shipman, B. (2004). Visions in monochrome: Families, marriage and the individualization thesis. The British Journal of Sociology, 55(4), 491–509.
van Hooff, J. (2013). Modern couples? Continuity and change in heterosexual relationships. Farnham: Ashgate.
Wacquant, L. (2005). Habitus. In M. Zafirovski (Ed.), International encyclopaedia of economic sociology (pp. 315–319). London/New York: Routledge.
Wouters, C. (2004). Sex and manners: Female emancipation in the west 1890–2000. London: Sage.
Yodanis, C., & Lauer, S. (2014). Is marriage individualized? What couples actually do. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6(2), 184–197.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carter, J., Duncan, S. (2018). Choosing Tradition: Getting Married. In: Reinventing Couples. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58961-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58961-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58960-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58961-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)