Skip to main content

Choosing Tradition: Getting Married

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reinventing Couples

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life ((PSFL))

  • 481 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter further explores the links between de-traditionalisation and re-traditionalisation. It does so by examining the survival of marriage in Britain and the desire of many young women to ‘choose’ tradition in marrying and becoming a wife. In so doing, the chapter, using insights from critical institutionalism, mounts a critique of contemporary attempts to update individualisation theory and details how tradition is reworked and reproduced in dealing with social change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Expressed as persons marrying per 1000 unmarried persons over 16.

  2. 2.

    2011 estimate assuming 2010 divorce and mortality rates throughout the duration of marriage.

  3. 3.

    Although this construction of the self is also ‘the unreflexive product of a particular cultural tradition, namely Western modernity’ (Adams 2003: 234).

References

  • Adams, M. (2003). The reflexive self and culture: A critique. British Journal of Sociology, 54(2), 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adkins, L. (1995). Gendered work; sexuality, gender and labour markets. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agerholm, H. (2017) Theresa May says there are ‘boy jobs and girl jobs’ in the home. The Independent (online). Accessed at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-philip-may-husband-boy-jobs-girls-one-show-take-bins-out-bbc-prime-minister-marriage-a7727481.html. Accessed 12 June 2017.

  • Barlow, A., Duncan, S., James, G., & Park, A. (2005). Cohabitation, marriage and the law: Social change and legal reform in the 21st century. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualisation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. (2010). Why marry? Young women talk about relationships, marriage, and love. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. (2012). What is commitment? Women’s accounts of intimate attachment. Families, Relationships and Societies, 1(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, N., Davies, C., & Harrris, C. (2008). Families in transition: Social change, family formation and kin relationships. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., & Mac an Ghaill, M. (2015). Exploring detraditionalization through gender reflexivity in late modernity: The negotiation of family/filial responsibilities among Taiwanese (younger) professional men. Families, Relationships and Societies, 4(3), 449–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, F. (2012). Development as bricolage. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cokely, C. (2005). “Someday my prince will come”: Disney, the heterosexual imaginary and animated film. In C. Ingraham (Ed.), Thinking straight: The power, the promise, and the paradox of heterosexuality (pp. 167–182). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, A.M. (2015). Domestic friends’: Women’s friendships, motherhood and inclusive intimacy. The Sociological Review, 63(3), 662–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. (2012). Reviewing the critique of individualization: The disembedded and embedded theses. Acta Sociologica, 55(4), 305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, A. (2008). Second thoughts on the family. London: CIVITAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1987). How institutions think. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S., & Phillips, M. (2008). New families? Tradition and change in modern relationships. In A. Park, J. Curtice, K. Thomson, M. Phillips, M. Johnson, & E. Clery (Eds.), British social attitudes: The 24th report (pp. 1–28). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldén, S. (2012). Scripts for the ‘good couple’: Individualization and the reproduction of gender inequality. Acta Sociologica, 55(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (pp. 56–109). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilding, M. (2010). Reflexivity over and above convention: The new orthodoxy in the sociology of personal life, formerly sociology of the family. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(4), 757–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, N. (2005). The detraditionalization of intimacy reconsidered. Sociological Theory, 23(3), 286–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1983). Introduction: Inventing traditions. In E. Hobsbawm & T. Ranger (Eds.), The invention of tradition (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, C. (1999). White weddings: Romancing heterosexuality in popular culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeff, D. (2013). UK cohabitation and marriage survey. Modern Marriage: Myths, Realities and Prospects. Available at http://www.marriagefoundation.org.uk/. Accessed 5 June 17.

  • Langhamer, C. (2007). Love and courtship in mid-twentieth century England. The Historical Journal, 50(1), 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, S., & Yodanis, C. (2010). The deinstitutionalization of marriage revisited: A new institutional approach to marriage. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(1), 58–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., Quintas, P., & Wield, D. (1992). High tech fantasies; science parks in society, science and space. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ONS. (2013). Divorces in England and Wales: 2013. Statistical bulletins.

    Google Scholar 

  • ONS. (2016). Marriages in England and Wales. Statistical bulletins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otnes, C., & Pleck, E. H. (2003). Cinderella dreams: The allure of the lavish wedding. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R. (1963). Marriage in the fifties. The Sociological Review, 11(2), 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleasance, P., & Balmer, N. J. (2012). Ignorance in bliss: Modeling knowledge of rights in marriage and cohabitation. Law & Society Review, 46(2), 297–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shumway, D. (2003). Modern love: Romance, intimacy, and the marriage crisis. New York: New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C., & Shipman, B. (2004). Visions in monochrome: Families, marriage and the individualization thesis. The British Journal of Sociology, 55(4), 491–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hooff, J. (2013). Modern couples? Continuity and change in heterosexual relationships. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2005). Habitus. In M. Zafirovski (Ed.), International encyclopaedia of economic sociology (pp. 315–319). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, C. (2004). Sex and manners: Female emancipation in the west 1890–2000. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yodanis, C., & Lauer, S. (2014). Is marriage individualized? What couples actually do. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6(2), 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carter, J., Duncan, S. (2018). Choosing Tradition: Getting Married. In: Reinventing Couples. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58961-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58961-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58960-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58961-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics