Abstract
The authors analyze Greece’s present business model and its deficiencies as well as the sustainability of the Greek debt burden. They conclude that the reform process is a necessary condition for structural change and economic recovery. Its completion and the promotion of private investment would accelerate the reconstruction of the Greek economy. In addition, a strongly conditioned haircut or a phasing out of the Greek debt burden is inevitable to render Greece’s public debt sustainable and to end the ongoing bailout process. The authors recommend discontinuing additional financial assistance to Greece and restoring its status as an ordinary member of the EU and the Eurogroup. The country would have full access to existing stabilization mechanisms but in return would have to observe the rules of the stability and growth pact and to accept EU economic policy coordination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Baldacci, Emanuele and Manmohan S. Kumar. 2010. “Fiscal Deficits, Public Debt, and Sovereign Bond Yields.” IMF Working Papers 10/184.
Benček, David, and Henning Klodt. 2011. “Fünf Prozent sind (zu) viel.” Wirtschaftsdienst 91(9): 595–600.
Darvas, Zsolt and Pia Hüttl. 2015. “How to Reduce the Greek Debt Burden?” Bruegel: Analyses, January 9. http://www.bruegel.org/nc/blog/detail/article/1533-how-to-reduce-the-greek-debt-burden/
Dimitris A. Sotiropoulos. 2014. “The Social Situation of Greece Under the Crisis.” In Basic Socio-Economic Data for Greece, 2013. Athens: FES.
European Commission. 2012a. “The Second Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece.” Occasional Papers 94, Brussels, March.
European Commission. 2012b. “The Second Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece – First Review.” Brussels, December.
European Commission. 2013. “European Economic Forecast,” European Economy 7/2013, Brussels, November.
European Commission. 2014. “European Economic Forecast,” European Economy 7/2014, Brussels, November.
European Commission. 2015. “European Economic Forecast,” European Economy 2/2015, Brussels, May.
Eurostat. 2015a. “Database: Employment by Sex, Age and Economic Activity (from 2008 onwards, NACE Rev. 2) – 1 000 [lfsq_egan2].” Accessed January 7. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=lfsq_egan2&lang=en
Eurostat. 2015b. “Database: Annual National Accounts, GDP and Main Components, Exports and Imports by Member States of the EU/Third Countries – Current Prices.” Accessed January 1. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/national-accounts/data/database
Eurostat. 2015c. “Database: International Trade Detailed Data.” Accessed May 7. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/international-trade/data/database
ILO (International Labour Organization). 2015a. “Statistics and Databases. Employment by Sex and Institutional Sector (Thousands) – Greece.” Accessed January 9. http://www.ilo.org/ilostat
ILO (International Labour Organization). 2015b. “Statistics and Databases. Employment by Sex and Economic Activity (Thousands) – Greece.” Accessed January 27. http://www.ilo.org/ilostat
International Monetary Fund. 2010a. IMF Country Report 10/110. Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund. 2010b. IMF Country Report 10/286. Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund. 2010c. IMF Country Report 10/372. Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund. 2011a. IMF Country Report 11/68. Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund. 2011b. IMF Country Report 11/175. Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund. 2011c. IMF Country Report 11/351. Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund. 2013. IMF Country Report 13/241. Washington, DC: IMF.
International Monetary Fund. 2014. IMF Country Report 14/151. Washington DC: IMF.
Laaser, Claus-Friedrich. 1997. Ordnungspolitik und Strukturwandel im Integrationsprozess: Das Beispiel Griechenlands, Portugals und Spaniens, (Governance and structural change in the integration process: the example of Greece, Portugal and Spain) vol. 287. Tübingen: KielerStudien
McKinsey & Company. 2011. “Greece 10 Years Ahead. Defining Greece's New Growth Model and Strategy. Executive Summary.” Athens, September.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2011. Greece: Review of the Central Administration. Paris: OECD Public Governance Reviews.
Schrader, Klaus, David Benček, and Claus-Friedrich Laaser. 2013a. “Greece, Back on Track?” In Kiel Policy Brief 68. Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
Schrader, Klaus, David Benček, and Claus-Friedrich Laaser. 2013b.“IfW-Krisencheck: Alles wieder gut in Griechenland?” In Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge 522/523. Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
World Bank. 2015. Doing Business – Measuring Business Regulations. Economy Rankings. Washington, DC: World Bank. Accessed January 23. http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schrader, K., Benček, D., Laaser, CF. (2016). Requirements for a New Business Model in Greece. In: Petrakis, P. (eds) A New Growth Model for the Greek Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58944-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58944-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58943-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58944-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)